UPDATED: 20 June, 2015 --
The latest news: MPs stand for a further pay rise of 10 per cent. Yet, the Prime Minister David Cameron turned down the 1 per cent pay rise for nurses.
Ian Duncan Smith, head of the Dept of Work and Pensions will cut Welfare by £12billlion.
UPDATE: 8 September, 2014 -- A year on it had been agreed that the MPs should get 9 per cent increase. Yet, it is the MPs who vote for freezing the wages, cutting benefits, budgets of councils and NHS but when it is about their pocket not a vote against their own salary increase. There goes another promise of PM David Cameron to reduce the cost of the Parliament. Has he ever fulfilled one of his promises?
The latest news: MPs stand for a further pay rise of 10 per cent. Yet, the Prime Minister David Cameron turned down the 1 per cent pay rise for nurses.
Ian Duncan Smith, head of the Dept of Work and Pensions will cut Welfare by £12billlion.
UPDATE: 8 September, 2014 -- A year on it had been agreed that the MPs should get 9 per cent increase. Yet, it is the MPs who vote for freezing the wages, cutting benefits, budgets of councils and NHS but when it is about their pocket not a vote against their own salary increase. There goes another promise of PM David Cameron to reduce the cost of the Parliament. Has he ever fulfilled one of his promises?
It is barely a month ago when the Ministers of Parliament (MPs)
insisted on a £7,500 pay rise to their more than adequate yearly salaries of
£65,000 plus their various form of expenses. Expenses for which ordinary people
have to pay out of their wages.
Now they demand a £20,000 expense perk. This means a flat rate, tax-free allowances
for food and second home costs.
Furthermore, they want the payment without any receipts or filling out an
expense form. They must be living on
another plant to demand a £20,000 expense allowance, tax-free and no receipts
to prove it. This sneaky, not so clever idea came about because a number were
caught out putting down expenses which had nothing to do with their work and
were heavily fined or even imprisoned.
Do they know that £20,000 is a high wage these days for ordinary people,
in spite of having to pay quite a large sum of National Insurance and Tax?
==================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS, THANK YOU.
==================================================
==================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS, THANK YOU.
==================================================
The rise of salaries were agreed to compensate for the loss
of expenses. Therefore, it shows their full audacity and attitude at a time of
austerity supposed on ordinary people and living now in great poverty, to
demand now after it was all set and done a £20,000 flat-rate for expenses.
Aren’t we all pleased to read the Speaker of the House of
Commons John Bercow suggested the change over from the present expense system
to a single allowance? He also forwarded
a letter to the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority who regulates the
MPs’ pay. Mr Bercow pointed out further
that 17 out of 20 do not claim expenses purely to avoid the hassle of filling in
forms and provide receipts.
Unbelievable!
Matthews Sinclair, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “It
would be completely unacceptable for MPs to enjoy a tax-free allowance with no
scrutiny whether the money is spent on legitimate expenses and not transparency
over if it amounts to anything more than a top-up for their already substantial
pay.”
He points out further that it would undermine Parliament
while there is a freeze on public wages. Many taxpayers would see it as a stitch-up.
Wouldn’t it be a shock for the MPs having to pay for their own
‘sandwiches’ and the Lords who get £300 a day when they are sitting. In spite
of it all the taxpayers have to pay for their ‘lunches’ which amounts to a staggering £65,000 per week. We can reveal it is not beans of toast or fish
fingers and there after all over 750 Lords.
On all these extra costs not a word of cutting back and about
austerity. There again a Lord who is a
multi-millionaire anyway and still receives a £300 a day surely could and
should pay for his own lunch. If it would be implemented it would rock the
foundation of the House of Parliament more than Guy Fawkes could have ever
achieved.
Although the proposed pay rise of £7,500 agreed on but it
would only come into effect after the 2015 election. All three party leaders have rejected it
which is most surprisingly.
It wouldn’t be a surprise if they get it granted after all. So far
we have never seen a proposal of that kind turned down.
At the moment the Government is ruling beyond any belief.
No comments:
Post a Comment