USA HAS NO RIGHT TO ATTACK OTHER COUNTRIES Update 15 June,2017

High time USA  stops playing the world power under the cover to bring democracy. They have not got it in the USA the way they tread the none-whites. USA destroyed enough countries and lives.

Update 15 June, 2017 --
Since Qatar refused a business deal with the USA they are now labelled as terrorists sympathiser and sanctioned. Has the USA found a new country to attack and destroy forever?

They won't turn on Saudi Arabia because they are too big and powerful and one of the biggest weaponry buyers but are the biggest terrorists sympathisers.

Update 27 Oct., 2016 --

USA destroyed three coastal radar sites in Yemen which makes them involved there. Saudi Arabia has been already bombarding the country for some time with weapon supplied by USA and UK.

Another country to be destroyed for no reason at all to the USA

Since the end of  WWII the USA never stopped attacking other countries.

First under the excuse to stop communism. They attack Vietnam, Korea, Laos, Cambodia and left them completely devastated and in ruins.

None of these countries were aggressive to the USA. Communist Russia under Stalin would not full back these countries knowing it would escalate into another World War. Therefore to call Russia, then and now, aggressive is wrong just to draw the attention from themselves.

Reminder, it was Russia which defused the built up when the chemical bomb was dropped and John Kerry pushing us into another full scale war with all his might. Russia is not perfect but not half as aggressive as always pointed at or the USA.

Yet they supported Pol-Pot, Papa Dog, Baby Dog and Khmer Rouge which were one of the worst killers in history.

Does that make sense?

Recently they attacked Afghanistan and overthrown the government because they were dictators. The same excuse was made to invade Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and now Syria.

They were all illegal wars and yet the UN, supposed to be a peace keeper, never raised an eye brow leave alone stopped it.

If these governments were dictators and kept killing their people what about George Bush and Tony Blair? They have killed in Iraq alone one million civilian. It is doubtful that even Saddam Hussein would have achieved that.

Israel almost wiped Palestinians off the map  but nobody, leave alone the USA, would call them dictators. USA would not invade Israel because it supplies the USA with weapons. Israel produces the most sophisticated weapons in the world.

Since USA and UN are trying to be so righteous why is George Bush and Tony Blair not prosecuted for the illegal war;  killing so many people in Afghanistan and Iraq and thousands of soldiers had to die needlessly?

Britain had a investigation on the Iraq war and Chilcot's report stated openly it was wrong and illegal and proved that Tony Blair sanctioned it. It cost 480 British soldiers lives and one million civilians in Iraq but up till now Tony Blair is allowed to carry with his Empire making billions of ponds. He was never pulled into court in The Hague.

Where is the USA righteousness there and George Bush?

The USA started a war in Syria for the only reason given again that  President  Assad  is a dictator and kills his people. Yet the USA has again killed hundred times more people. Let the Taliban grow in Afghanistan and the IS in Iraq.

Does the USA ever look at its own record or is only interested in getting rid of the weaponry to produce more to keep the dollar flowing?

When IS got completely out of hand and the threat was there to overrun the West loud scream for help started to be heard.

When there was a chemical bomb dropped in Syria and US State Secretary John Kerry never stopped to beat the drums for military intervention, blaming Syria's army. Mr Assad admitted they have chemical weapons but never used it

John Kerry also insisted that 1,500 people died but the "Doctors without Borders" which were there at the time insisted it was 200 or 300.

John Kerry is nothing but a warmonger yet when he was fighting in the Vietnam war he was dishonourable dismissed because he was  in contact with the Vietcong. A dishonourable dismissal from military in America is the worst thing, it means no employment or very low; yet look where John Kerry is.

John Kerry near convincing the West  and it came to a point that world peace was threatened facing a chemical WWIII. Literally in the last minute Russia intervened made  Mr Assad hand over his chemical weapons to the Russians to be destroyed.

The UN sent an envoy of top inspectors out but the report was never published therefore you can make your own conclusion. John Kerry vanished into the back ground.

In the meantime, the Kunduz hospital, run by "Doctors without Borders" with a  big red cross on the roof was bombed. At first the USA tried to justify it that 12 Taliban were hiding inside. Even so a hospital should never been bombed and eventually America admitted the mistake but gave a very lukewarm speech by one of the top brass.

Now, three hospitals were bombed in Syria and first big headlines but eventually it went out of the limelight and nobody asked any more question. 46 Syrian soldiers were killed by mistake!! No question being asked; answer given but eventually the Russians were blamed. 

At the moment is the scandalous bombing of an aid supply convoy heading toward Aleppo hitting three of the trucks. At first the USA was blamed but then it turned into Russia got the blame.

The moment the incident happen John Kerry was there again to point the finger at Russia. Russia never commented and so far it had not been officially established who was at fault.

Will we ever know or will it be kept secret again like the chemical attack?

One thing for sure if it was Russia it would have been all over the newspapers.

It is well known that USA and their Allies bombing and fighting the IS and supplying weaponry through the backdoor to them.

Since Russia got involved they pointing their fingers at them for bombing Aleppo, killing civilians, but nobody in the West or USA blame USA to have started another illegal war killing civilians since 2011.

BRITISH ICON MG ROVER MOVES TO CHINA

MG production at Longbridge, Birmingham, has a 110 years history. It was sold by the Blair government in 2005 to Shanghai Automobile Industry Corporation despite order books were full but due to greedy, bad management.

The sale was announced at the same time as a 130 per cent UK sale  increased was revealed.

MG Rover was the Pride and Envy of the world but it did not mean anything to Thatcherite Tony Blair and his friends.

The feeble reason now was Brexit which caused  the dropping of the Pound therefore China did not see any sense in investing further in Longbridge. It is only one side of the coin  but since China plans to expand into Europe the other side is shipping costs which cancels the savings.

A huge amount has to be spend on moving the production to China, train thousands of workers and will take years to balance the books again.

It is yet another major job loss to thousands of specialised workers. The Government keeps randing on about the Northern Powerhouse and at the same time lets the Steel works go to the wall and now MP Rover move to China. What kind of Government is this?

The  move will also have an impact on the Steel Industry. Well done Mrs May putting another few nails into the coffin.

At the same time as PM Theresa May lets a 110 years old production of a world  famous car go to China; she lets China built a nuclear power station in the UK. What kind of exchange is this?

"Made in Britain" has still a ring of guarantee; while consumer, like it or not, still has a suspicion about "Made in China".  It also could mean the decline of the famous make MG and Rover.

A fine example the famous Waterford Crystal "Made in Ireland" moved their production to China and the demand diminished with "Made in China" is no  more.

MG was first produced in Oxfordshire 92 years ago.

The Longbridge car production started in 1906. MG moved there in 1956. At its height during 1950 and 1970 it employed 25,000 people. Over 200,000 cars are produced a year and it is the biggest car production in the UK   Austin Morris started production in 1948.

All this does not mean a thing to the Tory Government like the Coal Mines, Ship Industry, Royal Mail, Steel Industry, NHS and MG Rover. It also does not care about the hundreds of thousands job losses which also has an impact on whole communities being ripped apart.

It is getting even more senseless to build now this super high speed train HS2 costing eventually over £100billion to Manchester and Birmingham where all the major industries had been ripped out.

Ministers were asking whether British Steel would be used to build the HS2 but were never given a promise which means it will not be. They were told that costs have to be kept down; in other words Chinese steel will be used.