Update 3 April, 2017 --
But PM May does go ahead with the inquiry. She started, unbelievable, in Australia first. This is nothing but time saving for the accused Westminster's paedophiles. So far we only heard a guilty paedophile being guilty when he died. It is disgusting that they still cover-up. The victims must feel terrible about it; on top what they have been through already.
UPDATE 11 Nov., 2016 --
A retired judge looked into three cases of 78 and found there is no evidence. On a whole he thinks Theresa May should not proceed and the Met Police done it all wrong. Will it, again, swept under the carpet?
The inquiry was started two years ago when Theresa May was Home Office Secretary but was dragging her feet. So far it costs the taxpayers, of course, £20million and not one word of names or evidence yet.
The police found evidence of 78 VIPs being accused of sex with children. Surely the police were doing a very thorough job. Really there was no need for an inquiry any way. What is the hold-up? Another cover-up? Celebrities and public were dealt with in no time and convicted in the court. Why not VIPs? Especially being a VIP should not have more privilege to escape justice if guilty of child sex abuse.
The new chairwoman, a former social worker, Professor Alexis Jay is dealing so far with the three resignations.
Even experts are of the opinion that the inquiry has already run out of time because a number of the accused have died and probably also victims. The former director of public prosecutions Lord MacDonald said: "It should be either constrained or closed."
Veteran barrister Michael Manfield QC said: "This had been chaotic from the beginning, there should have been far more consultation not just about the terms of reference but about how it's going to be managed.
"I'm very willing to consider it. they need another lawyer at the top because there are legal decisions to be made and I'm afraid the present chair isn't a lawyer."
Remember! When the victims asked to meet Mr May when she was a Home Office Secretary to state their case to add pressure for an inquiry. Mrs May agreed to a meeting but then the victims waited at her office and after a considerable time were told that Mrs May had flown out to Brussels where there was no meeting.
So far we heard only one name mentioned Lord Janner, Labour, and at that time it was vigorously denied any involvement with children. Soon Lord Janner died and then it was revealed he was accused of 29 cases.
No Tory has been announced being accused so far!
During Thatcher's time an official was ordered to look into the accusation of child sex abuse. In a very short time he closed the books announcing that half of the Thatcher Government was involved.
Only after Jimmy Saville's death a tsunami broke loose of his huge number of sex abuse of children and in mortuaries. All of a sudden everybody knew about his years of vile abuse. At the same time they also knew that if they would speak out their job started to wobble until it would vanished.
Jimmy Saville and Greville Janner were even knighted and demands came now to take the knighthood off but so far it was not done because both families object. It does not say much about principles of the families as well as the Government.
Since plum job of chairing the VIP sex abuse inquiry cost £185,000 a year plus a huge amount of expenses and nothing will come of it; they might just as well close it now.
It is estimated that it would cost the taxpayers at the end around £100million which is far too much for nothing.
Update 22 April, 2017 --
Even after he resigned it is still galling that he had the nerve and authority to use £9million taxpayers money knowing full well they are starving despite of working full time and depriving disabled people.
£9m to feather the printer's, bound to be a friend, and his wife's nest who ran the stationary at Parliament.
Tories have no calm to throw about and waste taxpayer's money which is so desperately needed by the people.
The scandal is a 16 page "leaflet" to remain in the EU and with £9million Taxpayers' money.
The general public is very hard up and over one million families are starving and rely on food bank in a country being the sixth richest nation but subjected to constant mismanagement, austerity and cuts since 2010.
In April there will be another £12billlion Welfare Cut and £16billion Council Cut coming into effect. Both will have an unbearable impact.
=================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS. THANK YOU
=================================================
The Prime Minister is not only trying to influence the public with his "leaflet" to remain in EU but has never considered the impact on families who lost their job due to the economical failure of the Government and austerity. They lost or will lose more benefit, especially the disabled.
However, there is a silent protest by many of the public to send the "leaflet" back to Mr Cameron at 10 Downing Street.
In the meantime, it was revealed by one of the most powerful men in Brussels, European Parliament vice president Alexander Graf Lambsdorff that Mr Cameron cherished achievement of a "emergency brake" on migrants claiming in-work benefit in the UK.
Mr Lambsdorff described PM's package as "nothing more than a deal that has been hammered out down the local bazaar". He has his doubts whether it will survive a scrutiny by the MEPs. Mr Lambsdorff is a highly influential MEP.
IMF also backed the BREMAIN campaign of Mr Cameron by stating that it would be better for the UK economy.
The argument against it is that the UK import is far higher than its export to the EU besides there is always the World Market. The UK has always been a free nation and a big trading nation.
As a matter of fact it was reported that the UK is not allowed to export beef, pork and chickens to the USA despite their close friendship. The reason is the EU forbidden it. At a Brexit Agriculture would gain a big market.
Many of other major EU countries have itchy feet and the people also demanding a referendum of IN/OUT of EU membership. The problem is that Brussels has become too dominating and forever demanding billions of pounds which brought these countries financially down.
By all objective views we cannot ignore the many red tapes on businesses and industries which is nothing but a hindrance.
EU at present regarding the huge influx of migrants the EU refuses to close Europe's borders and stopped a blockade to migrant boats. It had been established that 99 per cent are organised by human traffickers earning huge amounts of money.
The EU membership costs £19billions and is ruling the UK more and more. MEPs already promised a tsunami of rules is coming down on the UK if the referendum will be a "Yes" to remain in the EU.
How much more evidence does the public need to be convinced to get rid of all these rules and restriction?
In my opinion the Prime Minister never acts for the benefit of his people. Why should he now?
UPDATE: 6 June, 2016
The message of this story reminded us that there are so many schemes since 2010 all ending up in failure. Every time costing the taxpayers £1million or more. Is it really failure or is there some method in the madness to put money in a scheme and then let it fail? What happened to the money every time it has failed? Doubting it has been put back.
There is another failed scheme and this time from Nick Clegg, Deputy Prime Minister, established in 2012 for young people to find work. The Youth Contract was to help young people to be employed. At the beginning of the scheme they managed to get 5,000 under-25s to finished their six-month placements. It had not been revealed whether they were employed permanently after that.This was only a fraction of what was planned for younger people to be permanently employed. The full scheme supposed to have created jobs for 160,000 in a period of three years.
Looking back now the scheme shows nothing but to be a failure. It cost the taxpayers, of course, £1billion which would have been a great help in their struggle to put food on their table, if it was spend on them. No doubt the intention was good to get young people into employment but where lays the fault which led to a failure? Is it the fault of employees? Did they get an incentive to employ and train youngster?
==================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS. THANK YOU.
==================================================
There are questions to be answered. After all it was £1billion of taxpayers money. It has been noted that when the government's schemes fail, and there are too many by now, there is never an explanation given to the public. Nor any evidence given whether the money was returned. It is high time the government is being made responsible for their action.
The government has wasted so much money and because it is not theirs but the taxpayers they do not seem to treat it more responsible. Money which would have kept the people from starvation or loosing their homes because they cannot pay rent or mortgages any longer due to too low wages.
