UK's MPs INSULTED WORKERS -- Updated: 6 June,2015

UPDATED: 6 June, 2015 -- The Tories had been re-elected despite their terrible track records and as a majority, only 12 seats. Now they have the full power and it most probably will be worse. Already plans for anti-strikes laws, selling the Royal Mail's properties, cutting Welfare by £12billion, Public servicing by £16billion, introducing fracking and the most probably sold off like British Petroleum to foreign bidders and so on.

It most probably be worse now since they have the full power and wore will come to the public. The Elite will increase by numbers and wealth.

Again MPs  pointed the fingers at unemployed people stating too many people prefer to stay in bed rather than get a job. On which planet are these MPs living?

The Tory-led Coalition for ever cutting work forces and there is a 2.5million unemployment. Admittedly there is always a certain number of unemployable but not all of the 2.5million.

Furthermore, to compare British workers with Asia is not very clever because it is a complete different way of life and working there.

The only good thing might come out of these offensive and inaccurate accusations are that the pressure might bring David Cameron away from playing computer games as it was revealed and make him kick-start the economy.

Apparently the root of all these talks lays with Lord Mayor of London Boris Johnson. He advised David Cameron to stop “pussyfooting around” and bring a big infrastructure projects, de-regulation and tax cuts.

 This advice makes sense, does it?.

They further accused Labour and yet Labour had about 1.5million at the time of the credit crunch where really the bottom fell out of the economy but by the time the Coalition took over Mr Brown got the GDB up to 1 per cent which quickly sank and by now has a double-dip recession with the mismanagement of the Coalition.

To cut constantly the Armed forced, Nurses and Civil servants while at the same time increasing taxes does not work in any economy.

Furthermore, David Cameron gave three or four major contracts to European Countries and therefore companies had to cut workforce. The Union was fighting hard to prevent it but the government in their arrogant way took no notice. 

The MPs should look at themselves when they call the British workers the idlers of the world. They themselves don’t look over-worked and underpaid. Especially with adding more expenses which should not be added or don’t exists.  A 33 weeks a year working in Parliament is not exactly killing themselves for the country.

Have they got legislation through about regulating the banks again? NO.  They talk about it all the time of the high bonuses and David Cameron promised in his election manifesto, he promised March 2011, he promised for September 2011, he promised twice this year to get it through. Of course, he would not dare because they are all the boys who donate to the Conservative party and his friend who get invited to garden party in Downing Street.

Has David Cameron made any attempt to retrieve the taxes from £39trillion in tax havens? He himself talks about it but does nothing again because they are the boys who donate.

These are hypocritical standards by the Tory-led Coalition.  Yet, to call hard working Britons to be the idlers of the world is so ludicrous and if it were not so insulting and hurtful one could laugh. These people are going through hell and high water to keep going.  Something a MP would know nothing about it.  The unemployed are trying more than their best to get employment but if the government can't provide enough jobs what can the ordinary workers do? There are student coming out of Universities with a string of top qualification and they applying to every place they can think off but can't get a job. It is so bad that many don't bother any more to go to the University they don't see the point to get into debts and can't get employment.

. 

Therefore it is no good pointing at Indian children aiming to be doctors or lawyers when the government cutting the NHS to pieces.

Get your facts right first before you open your mouth just to be noticed because that is really what you are after to further your career.

Instead of criticising the workers it would more appropriate if the Coalition would work harder to bring back economic grows. It can be done with job creation and not with austerity. 

DAVID CAMERON DEFENDS FOREIGN AIDS Update 17 May, 2016

UPDATE: 17 May, 2016 --
Every turn a dirty trick.

The reason for David Cameron defending Foreign Aid was now revealed.

According to the report Foreign Aid is given to private firms for infrastructures in poorer countries.

These private companies are not paying any taxes and the City of London is completely in control and offers the service at a high price. In other words a lot of the money is flooding back which leaves these countries in great debts and is unrepayable.

A summit was held at 10 Downing Street last Sunday with PM David Cameron and other international leaders.  The meeting was about to tackle the growing malnutrition in the developing world.

At the moment there is great criticism about the hand-out of £12billion for foreign aids. The point they are making is that at the moment Britain has great financial problems and the government is cutting right across the board.  This created more than great hardship amongst families, pensioners and disabled people. Therefore a cut-back on foreign aids would also be justified and not an increase. 

It is not only that £12billion been given to counteract the malnutrition of the developing world it is that these monies have been given year after year and therefore there should be a sign of reduction.  The coalition should look a bit closer and not just send money.  These aids were given for decades since the 1950s and therefore there should be a much better living standard by now. No way was that money handed down to the needy.

 

Let’s just take the £12billion this year given only by Britain. At the end when all the other countries add their money it must be an enormous amount. This money then divided up and given to the various developing world countries is more than a substantial amount.  Then again exchanged into their money  it becomes huge but the cost of living in those countries are low and the labour therefore if it would have been handed over it would surely eliminate the struggle almost in one year.  Yet this has been going on year after year for decades.

The governments have a great responsibility when they spent the tax payers’ money to make sure it gets where it should go. Obviously looking still at malnutrition, illnesses, lack of schooling, running water it definitely hasn’t.  Therefore the Mr Cameron and all the other leaders should sit down with them and ask for proof of spending and explanations why it is malnutrition still exist to that extent.

Many of these developing countries have incredible political mismanagement and it is not a big guess where the aids’ money is really spent on.  Why then send more money every year?  Especially now when there is great hardship amongst people of Britain and will be increase when all the cut-backs bite.

It is a scandal that millions of people starving and the objection is not so much about not giving foreign aids. The objection is that it never or hardly reached those people while in this country people also having great hardship.  There were many facts coming out of Africa and Asia that the governments living an incredible luxurious lifestyle.  Or some countries are having a weapon supply which could put the whole western world in shame.  Or like India built a nuclear rocket while Britain couldn’t effort it and furthermore they called the £250,000 aids chicken feed. Surely £250,000 if passed on directly to the poor would have eliminated a lot of hunger and poverty. So what did they do with the money and why was again aids sent after that insult.  £250,000 exchanged into rupees would have bought a lot of bowls of rice.

All these points show really the root of why the foreign aids should be reduced for one thing and also to make sure it reaches the poor. 

If they would do this they would have to spent far less money and it would be really used for what it is for.