WE CAN NEVER TRUST THEM Update 8 November, 2019

Update 8 Nov., 2019 - Theresa May had to resign and the new PM Boris Johnson who was not voted by the people but by his own Party, since July 2019 and is even worse. By now everybody calls him a Liar, even EU's President Junker. 

He drove towards a no-deal- Brexit which Labour Party refused to vote for but demanded an extension; Johnson had no choice, ordered by the Law, to apply for very, very, very reluctanly. Then Johnson  demanded a GE and Labour agreed. On 12 December, 2019 UK will vote.

Hopefully the people vote Labour and a majority to get rid of Tories which devastated this country and people. 130,000 people died because of it.

Update: 11 Jan., 2017 -- NHS is in its worst crisis. Even the Red Cross was called for help but PM May denies it all just like Cameron denied the starvation exists when even church leaders sent protest letters. 


HOW DARE THEY TREAT PEOPLE LIKE THAT?

HIGH TIME FOR A CHANGE!!!!!

UPDATE: 19 July, 2016 --  Although Mr Cameron resigned and Mr Osborne got the sack it is doubtful they stop influencing the Government.

Already Mr Osborne made a speech of signing the Trident update with nuclear weapons because the economy is in improving. Well it did not under his six years in office as a Chancellor - the deficit ended highest for 37 years and the debt increased by £600billion to £1.6trillion.

The Trident project is estimated to £37bn but will surely end up as £100bn or more. H2S was est £35bn but is now £100bn and not even the tracks are laid.

Money available for all that but the public staving and homelessness the highest since record began in 1948.

Mr Cameron previously announced that he will stay even if the UK votes Brexit. The moment the vote was announced he resigned despite the big speech about Winston Churchill never gave up. He also said to one of his aides that he will not do the s*** in Brussels. It all shows Mr Cameron attitude. At least he resigned and is gone but will it make any difference with Theresa May as PM?

Mr Gove, now a candidate for the Prime Minister, stated several times that he will not stand to be PM. The news came through that he shot Boris Johnson in the back on Thursday night and couped half of Mr Johnson's supporters. They fell from 94 to 47.

He even went so far that he announced Boris Johnson was not able to lead the Party and the country. During the campaign for Brexit Mr Johnson showed and spoke far more sense and truth. David Cameron and George Osborne done nothing but scaremongering no matter what false statement they gave.

David Cameron resigned and is leaving on Wednesday. Theresa May the next Prime Minister. At the end she was the only candidate. All the other candidate resigned one by one?

Now Mrs May, Home Secretary, decided to stand to be Prime Minister. Mrs May has a string of failures in her present position. The contracted out Border Agency cost the country for years a high sum, never disclosed, but were constantly in the headlines for scandals. Mrs May eventually cancelled the contract and brought the control of the borders back under her authority called Border Force. As far it is known the security has not improved one bit.

Then there were the endless scandals of deportations. Not for years but decades hate preachers were able spread their messages to encourage young men. It cost the country £17million on benefits for them, court cases and support to their families who lived in big, expensive houses. Eventually when she managed for the court to agree a date of deportation she messed it up by forgetting such a vital date. The court procedures had to be started all over again.

The prison services contracted out to Serco and G4S were scandals about prisoners escaped and tagging for probation by G4S showed false records of people still in prison, dead or living abroad but G4S received other contracts still. The scandal of G4S announcing 10 days before the Olympics 2012 that they had no adequate security at a time when it was on high terrorists alert.

Now Mr Osborne cancelled his achieving a Surplus by 2020. At the same time he announced that the austerity will still continue and cuts will have to be made to reduce the highest deficit for 67 years which he made since 2010. 

He also stated that he will borrow more. In other words it  differs from his original plan of first announcing a Budget of £12billion Welfare cuts and more recently a £30billion to reduce the deficit and debts which the Tories created since 2010.

No Budget to reduce the out-of-hand MPs expenses. Constant 10 per cent salaries increase every year. More deployment of troops in Iraq and bombing in Syria which was totally against the wishes of the people. £500million additional payment to Brussels towards £4.2billion to Turkey to control migrants plus constant bail-out of lesser economical EU countries.

 It is only the tip of the list of endless wasted taxpayers' money while people are starving in this country and rely on over 1,000 food banks. The homelessness has risen to an all high since records began in 1948.

They should get their house in Westminster in order first before they yet cut again public spending. Mr Osborne would have the biggest surprise how much he would be able to safe. Not to speak about the tax avoiders which are his friends. He led Google off to pay an additional £150million to pay some of their tax avoiding which would still not be the full sum.

No we can not trust their promises any more or threats to keep the public in order. The gloom and doom they spread before the EU referendum shows right the opposite. The FTSE which showed minus almost every day since GE2015 shows now a plus ever since Tories won.

After 9 years of Tory Government, cutting Welfare, councils, this country is on its knees. 130,000 died because of starvation hypertharmia; millions relying on foodbanks; 100,000s sleeping on the street and dying there; NHS is breaking point; schools underfunded; despite of the cut-backs and 'savings' the Nat. Debt increased by £1trillion!

Hopefully, it can be changed by Labour winning a majority! Jeremy Corbyn and Labour is all for the people and not like Tories for the fatcats. It will be a tough fight be the fatcats dont like to lose fat income; dont mind people die on the street or at home because of the cuts.

TORY PREDICTED NHS £30BILLION SHORTFALL BY 2020

Why was the £8billion not paid into the NHS?  Another broken promise?

To whom are they telling this? The £30billion shortfall is entirely made by the present Tory Government.

The very reason for this madness is to bring the NHS down to breaking point and then it will be closed or sold and fulfil the wish of Margaret Thatcher who wanted the Welfare State destroyed but her Cabinet stopped her. One of her favourite, Cameron, started it and May is already talking about NHS being part of the USA trade deal. What else she is giving to the USA?

Cost of Trident nuclear refurbishment goes 90 per cent to USA but they turned their backs on Bombardier. Get your brain going, May, USA is nobody's friend but just get out what they can.  

Cameron promised at the election campaign 2015 that he would invest £8billion a year which would add up to £40billion by 2020. But as usual the Prime Minister never keeps his word.  Instead he demands a £22billion saving to balance the books. A fine turn around but not unexpected from the Tories.

Statistics show that during the year 2013-14 the deficit was £115million. The following year the deficit rose to £822million due to hiring nurses, doctors and matrons from agencies after they sacked 5,000.  It is a total chaotic waste of money. 

Previously it was discovered that around 50 chief executives are paid around £500,000 each.  Would the saving start there? Of course not.

Over 200 contracts are employed in the NHS. It is well known that contractors are working with a minimum staff and lowest paid to get the maximum profit. Therefore the quality of work bound to be effected.

During Cameron’s election campaign in 2010 he promised that the NHS will be safe in his hand. When he won the election, soon after, he axed 4,000 senior nurses with a lavish payout of £1,4billion. He also paid £5millions to outside consultants who decided whom to axe. What kind of arithmetic and politics is that?

330 of the 4,000 axed received a payout of more than £200,000.   Most probably they were back the next day hired through agencies.

At the same time Jeremy Hunt, Health Secretary, blocked a 1 percent pay rise for 600,000 hospital staff across the board.

Health minister Dan Poulter said at the time to axe managers and administration staff which would free-up £5,5billion for patient care.  Why was that not done?  Cameron’s friends would lose their lucrative job.  It is well know that the Tories have a very close network of friends.

PM spokesman said: “Reforms were in the pipeline to help the Government’s battle to claw back redundancy payment from staff that is then rehired.”  How does the PM spokesman make that out? If the rehiring is through an agency it will cost three times as much.

It is an open secret that a doctor cost £5,000 a day and nurses cost £1,400 a day if hired from a private agency.   One of the private agencies is Maximus.

It was reported that £5,5billion was paid to private agencies. What a ‘saving’ plus £1,4billion redundancy pay; plus £5million to outside consultants.

8,180 overseas nurses were recruited.

Where is the pledge from Cameron to reduced immigration?

Cameron promised £8billion a year to the NHS during his election campaign in 2015 but when he was elected it dwindle down to £8billion over the five years.

The voters are used to some of the pledges are not kept but the Prime Minister does not seem to keep any or hardly any of them. At the same time he still keeps promising.

The NHS is cut to the bones and now Cameron wants £22billion savings made till 2020.  As mention above the promised £8billion each year would add up to £40billion by 2020 and would put the NHS back to its full glory as it was before.

Cameron and his disciples are bent over backward to break up the NHS to introduce private insurance like America.  It would expand the insurance company and they could put up the fees.  The fatcats would be able to get mote shares in it and that is all the name of the game, in my opinion.

Then it will be like in America, if you have an insurance policy and not only that but have enough money in it you will be treated. If you cannot afford the high fees of the Insurance companies out you go, even in emergencies.

TROOPS HAVING TO RELY ON LOAN SHARKS

PRIME MINISTER
DAVID CAMERON 

This is another reason why the Tories should never come into power again. To pay the soldiers such a low wages that they get into depth and have to rely on loan sharks is despicable.  People who risk their lives and some die unnecessarily for a war which has nothing to do with Britain should at least receive a decent wage 

It also bound to play on their minds when they are in the front line fighting the Taliban. How can they be concentrating on their job? It bound to put some into danger or their comrades. They should have no financial worries at all when they out there and their mind is in peace that their family is well provided for.

The report states that it is not a few hundred who might have lived it up too much but thousands who did not live a life on the top but have to use loans sharks. It proves that the family back home cannot manage while the “Elite” is rolling in money.  The same people, who order them to fight in Afghanistan, were stopped by vote to enter Syria’s civil war and most probably will now get involved in Iraq.  These men and women are all right to do their dirty work but paying them properly so that they have not to use loan sharks which charges 1,734 per cent they are not all right for that.

===================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU.
==================================================

One thing has to be said here the US looks after its soldiers when they returned wounded far better than Britain. They get the best of treatment and places to recover which all the facilities possible. Mr Cameron does not take an example there.  USA also has established an Armed Forces credit union and US’s Navy Federal to help its four million American military personnel.  Furthermore, it is all state funded and have not rely on endless charities functions to get just the basic treatment, like in the UK.  This government has a lost to answer for.

This government aught to be ashamed but it is known they have no such emotions. Neither do they feel about the millions in the UK living under the bread line. They are so callous that they are even thinking of forbidding the food banks. If they do that there will be people either starved to death like in Dickinson time or such uproar they will never forget it.

Even Margaret Thatcher never got the country down so far as to the troops having to use loan sharks to survive or having hundreds of food banks established.  

In my opinion David Cameron is the worst Prime Minister and his Government since Victorian times.

CONSERVATIVES DONT WANT TO KNOW Update 31 March 2017

Theresa May previously inefficient Home Secretary became UK Prime Minister.
She introduced £12bn Welfare cuts which Osborne planned. Now, before Christmas she let the Universal Credit roll which stops payment for six weeks. Graciously she reduced it to five weeks.

It seems May is only following orders of Cameron and Osborne although they both left Parliament but May still carries on with their plans. Why? Would she lose her job if she decided differently? Both £12bn Welfare cuts and UC will be devastating on disabled and poor, starving, homeless people but the Tories do not care.

DAVID CAMERON PUTS ON
 SO MUCH WEIGHT 
IN ONLY THREE YEARS 
WHILE FAMILIES ARE
STARVING.  
IT TELLS YOU ALL

Update 31 March 2017
After a questionable win of GE2015 David Cameron resigned. 
Theresa May is now Prime Minister but cuts in Welfare are still implemented as laid down by Mr Osborne and Mr Cameron. There is no change. People are starving and homeless but now there are new cuts coming in on 1 April 2017 while £209bn for Trident and £70bn for HS2 train are available. No funds for NHS and schools which are in financial trouble.

After years of devastating governing by the Conservatives mainly and their coalition partner LibDem it is obvious that they haven’t got a clue or better still all for themselves. Therefore it was not a surprise David Cameron did not know the price of a loaf of bread stating he is making his own, no not even that, surely it must be his staff making his loaf of bread.  He could not exhaust himself early in the morning by putting in the ingredients and then pressing the button. He also does not even use the flour from the supermarkets not even organic flour but special flour from Cotswold. It must be GM free which his ministers praise and trying to convince the public there is nothing wrong with GM grown products.  It costs £4.38 for a 1.5kg bag.  If there is nothing wrong with GM grown products why spend so much money and have the same food? Chancellor George Osborne does not get his burgers from McDonald around the corner but delivered by taxi from a restaurant miles away

BORIS JOHNSON   
AMBITION TO BE
PRIME MINISTER

Boris Johnson, when he was Mayor of London, is none the better when asked how much a pint of milk cost; he answered £0.80 on the TV interview on Monday Newsnight. The interviewer Jeremy Paxman corrected him it was £0.40. It is again no surprise when he earns £250,000 a year and called it “chickenfeed” which indicates that he has other incomes and much, much bigger.  He also spends £1.57million on spin doctors and David Cameron £1.45million. Are the hard-up taxpayers footing the bills for that? Definitely.

==================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU.
==================================================

These are the kind of people who agree with cut backs and trying to lay down the law telling the already hard-up public how to run their lives. It proves they have not got a clue or do not want to have; which is not a surprising with incomes and backgrounds they have.

While David Cameron’s children get their bread made in a top range Panasonic £139 machine with £4.38 for a 1.5kg of flour for their breakfast many children haven’t even got a breakfast before they go to school because their parents can’t even afford a standard loaf of bread and their parents rely on the school meal for them to be fed.  This situation is the result of years of government by the Conservatives and the LibDem. They ought to be ashamed of themselves.

In spite of it all the Prime Minister spoke in his final speech about building an economy to bring down the debt and hope for a better future.  The public heard by now so many promises and it is not surprising too many people lost their trust, according to the opinion poll, in the government and their politics. Yet David Cameron, including his spin doctors, still handing out promises by the bag full. Are they not aware of the mood of the public? At least their spin doctors should be.

UK PM STANDS UP FOR CITY OF LONDON

Prime Minister David Cameron was defending the City of London and banks from a take-over by the EU. Mr Cameron would definitely protect the City of London and banks from being included into the European Central Bank system which will have its head office in Frankfurt.

The reason is that he is so adamant because they are his boys and contribute heavily to the economy. He does not lift a finger to stop the gas, electricity and petrol’s prices rising because these are affecting the ordinary people. Yet, the gas and electricity showed a profit of over £1.5billion last year and surely would have been more than enough to stay that way instead of increasing the tariffs by up to 10 per cent.

A

So far the coalition did not show any care whatsoever towards the public. Yet, his motto was “We are all in this together” which was soon forgotten when elected and they showed their real faces.

Furthermore, when everybody went up in arms about the banks and city’s sky high bonuses and people demanded from Prime Minister, times and times again, to stop it; he kept promising it but did nothing. Yet, when OCCUPY formed and started first to camp in city but then in front of St Paul’s Cathedral in no time at all David Cameron got a law through the court that they should be removed.

Both incidents show clearly how one-sided the government is which is totally wrong. It is forgotten or just brushed aside that it is the general public voted them in and it is the general public they should represent.

CAMERON CHILLAXED TWICE AT A EU'S SUMMIT MEETING

David Cameron was caught out once before when on a Commonwealth meeting he vanished a day before the meeting was finished. There again he could and should have sorted out several points with the rest of the heads of other commonwealth countries. It was remarked upon by other leaders that the Prime Minister should have remained but where did he go? He went to a vineyard and tasted their various products.

This time, at the EU’s summit meeting where it is was most vital to achieve the best agreement on the budget for the next seven years Mr Cameron vanished twice to eat in fancy restaurants. Surely the menu of the EU summit meeting was of the best there was available.

He promised the taxpayers that he would do his utmost and will negotiate hard but after a very few hours he vanished. He went to a top restaurant called Brasserie 1898 which has specialities of a variety of Belgian beers and chateaubriand steak costing £44.50.

Just before the summit super he was gone again for a fish dinner. The final lunch was baby venison and bottles of wine costing £120 each were served. Although the other menus were not reported but judging by this one it must be assumed the other lunch and dinners couldn’t be less extravagant. Only Mr Cameron can explain the reason for him having to vanish just before each lunch and dinner was served.

Again Mr Cameron wasted and lost time for important negotiations with other European leaders in the two days crunch budget summit meeting. This costs the taxpayers hundred of thousands of pounds in which nothing was achieved. Brussels has postponed it to another meeting in the New Years which adds more expenses. They definitely know how to live it up while the public in Britain gets pushed to the financial limit and soon beyond. 

It us doubtful that he became now Holy Joe because we do not hear any more of his escapades. Mr Cameron, most probably, has the thumb on the press not to report it.

CITY TRADER -- MONEY TO WASTE

That is how Mr Cameron's and Tories' friends live while families are brought down so low they have to rely on food banks. Mr Cameron still puts on a show of concern about the "hard-working people".

A city trader spent this incredible sum of £40k in one night. He treated nine friends to a night out and partying beside a famous film star of Hollywood on the night of Halloween. An eye witness stated the he didn’t hold back the moment he saw this famous star and maybe he tried to show off at the Raffles in Chelsea’s Kings Road.

They city trader started with 10 Zombie cocktails which are made of rum, absinthe and grapefruit at £30 each.

Soon he was dancing the night away at the 230 capacity members only club. When the famous star turned up at 11pm the city trader ordered three giant bottles of vintage Dom Perignon champagne methuselahs amounting to  £24,000. After came seven bottles of vintage Dom Perignon Oenotheque 1996 adding another £3,500; two Belvedere jeroboam vodkas adding £1,640; seven glasses of Don Julio 1942 tequila adding £224; two vintage Dom Perignon Rose 2000 magnums adding £2,200; six bottles of Krug rose adding £2,400; Red Bull for £87.50; Havanna rum at £350 and finally 16 café parton with tequila adding £160.00.

The final bill came to £34,861.40 plus £5,229.23

This is a glimpse how the city boys live and the world they live in. To spent £40k in one night without padding the eye lid while the country struggles to survive and not only the ordinary people but also the economy and the government does nothing to curb their bonuses. At the very same time David Cameron and his friends always shouting about AUSTERITY and benefits have to be cut for England’s economy to survive.

To spent this kind of money in one night they must be used to it. This only can be done with all their high salaries and top bonuses. Therefore, the prime minister and the coalition should step in where it should be done. Also the Bank of England was talking about and promised to bring in regulation of the bank and city.

This regulation had been well overdue and when the people started a movement under the name of OCCUPY they soon were removed but the government will no confront the banks and city.  It is no wonder when banks go bankrupt but then the government makes the taxpayer to step in to rescue them. Yet when it shows a profit it is soon distributed in bonuses instead of being made to pay it back to the taxpayers.

There is another broken promise of David Cameron of stopping these huge bonuses. Times and again he promised but when it came to it, it was quietly sidelined. At stage he said it takes time to do this but when Occupy launched a protest in no time he had it through the courts and they were removed. All the government’s action is certainly one-sided and not democratic.

All this mess is since Margaret Thatcher de-regulated the banking and finance system. That lady has a lot to answer for, for the shamble ever since exists and until the government does not regulate the banks and finance market there will be nothing but scandals coming up.

The scandal of the Libor but after it hit the headline we never heard anything about it and apart from one man being sacked but with a more than fat golden handshake which should have never been given. He also will receive big pension while ordinary people’s pension is getting cut.

David Cameron is certainly in this altogether and he must be smirking away at the ordinary people he keeps well down. However in the long run it will backfire in the economy when next year all the cuts will bite and the people have even less to spend. Well it also could be that the public will remember and not being swayed by more promises in the future. Time will tell.

CAMERON ABANDONED ANOTHER PROMISE

In his election manifesto he promised to be tough on crime. Looking back it makes it obvious that he never met one of his promises. UK and especially the major cities are swamped by crime and the police had a hard job before to keep it down. Therefore the Conservatives gave this promise to get voters on their site because people were fed-up being attacked on the streets and in their houses.

Yes, the Conservatives won the election, only by a minority and built a coalition with the Liberal Democrats.

The moment they were in power they abandon most if not all of their promises including the one being tough on crimes. Furthermore, they cut the police force right down in sacking 16,000 police officers at a time when the streets were riddle with crimes. Especially the elderly and disabled people were not safe because they couldn’t fight back.

Now the Home Secretary Theresa May announced that she will half the sums for crime prevention.  London will cut from £57million to £23million in 2013/14.  Wales from £3.1million to £1.2million.

This will affect the CCTV which is the greatest help to catch criminals, youth project, street lighting and gang prevention work.

No wonder Theresa May is the favourite of David Cameron in spite of her many mess-ups and frequent calls for her to be forced out or her willingly resign from her post.

These further cuts will also show in losing thousands of staff and especially 6,500 frontline officers.

All these reduction will provoke more crime and it will backfire in having more criminals locked up in what they claim in overfilled prisons. This also will result into more cost of keeping these criminals which in the long run does not justify the means of cutting down the police force as well as on crime prevention. When you cut down the impact has also to be looked at. This apparently is not the case made by the government and therefore it will have a chaotic impact on the public.

Next month there will be an election of 41 police and crime prevention commissioners. They are not given an idea what the budget will be and only after 15 November they will have to face the budget they have to work with.  The new commissioners will be in charge of chief constables and take over crime prevention budgets. This is not democracy as it should be. In a democracy all the facts are on the table and the candidates are able to discuss the situation with voters.

Apparently the cities which were worst hit by last year riots have to face the biggest cut. Birmingham will be cut from £1.5million to £620,000, Manchester from £1million to £415,000 and Leeds from £1.1million to £478,000.

CUTTING ALL THE BENEFITS AND SECURITY BY CUTTING DOWN THE POLICE AND THEIR FUNDING MAKES YOU WONDER IF THEY FIND ANYTHING ELSE TO THROW AT THE PUBLIC.  THEY FORGOT THAT IS IT THE PUBLIC WHO VOTED THEM IN AND NOW THEY ARE KICKING THE PUBLIC IN THE TEETH NON-STOP.

EU PLANS TO PAY MIGRANTS MOVING TO BRITAIN

After the disastrous ruling of the fishery industry where fisherman have to throw almost a third of dead fish overboard because it is over their quota and growing fruit all the same size which needs more chemical spray on it to achieve it plus to grow bananas straight it leaves us wonder about sense of the EU. Now we hear they are working on a new plan whereby jobless people get send to Britain with an incentive of a £1,000. They also could get travel expenses. They also would be paid £250 to help them to be interviewed and £830 for re-location cost.

Is that what Britain gets for its £19billion membership? plus all sorts of other payments.

Surely, it is on the top all their previous brainless rulings and decision. From a start Britain has 2.5million unemployed and amongst them over a one million youngsters who don’t seem to have a chance.  Brussels explanation for this hare brain scheme is that the tax-payers-funded scheme would give thousands of youngsters to move to Britain to seek employment and British youngster could use the scheme to move to the EU to work.

WHERE  IS  THE  SENSE  IN THAT?  Also people will be using the scheme to get money fraudulent.

The scheme is for job seekers age 18 to 30 and will be match with suitable vacancies.

The start has been made in Spain where youth unemployment is over 50 per cent. It will be extended to Germany, Denmark and Italy and eventually across the EU. Their Target is to help 5,000 people gain jobs through the EU scheme.

The statistic shows that tens of thousands of migrant have forced out British worker out of work. Prime Minister David Cameron wants Brussels to re-write the rules that allow Europeans to take jobs in Britain. When Mr Cameron visited two factories in recent weeks he found out that 50 to 60 per cent were people from the EU countries.

Tim Aker who is part of the ‘Get Britain out of the EU’ campaign stated that unemployment caused by the EU should be solved by the EU and not sends to Britain to force British people out of a job.

CAMERON'S IN/OUT REFERENDUM ON EU -- Updated 1 June, 2016

PM DAVID CAMERON

UPDATED: 1 June, 2016 --
Vote for the IN/OUT of EU is on 23 June, 2016 and already scandals appear that non-British people have received voting cards. Is it a slip-up or not. Can we have one guess?

UPDATED: 22 May, 2015 -- Well, the voters fell for it again and hopefully for all our sake Cameron will deliver this time. Time will tell.

UPDATE: 16 February, 2015 - - There are definitely great changes on the way. PM David Cameron promised now to bring the referendum forward to 2016, Ian Duncan Smith, head of the Department of work and Pensions, found all the right keys on his I.T. to set up the promised Universal Credit and is able to pay the people their due money in only a few months' time. Banks and Corporations start paying their taxes and the Treasury already received hundreds of thousands of pounds. Will the voters fall for this again? Hopefully not. Remember 2010!

UPDATE: 22 December 2014 -- The referendum on IN/OUT of the EU being amended and the Labour Party demands more amendments. Details are not given to the public. The major issue is, in the public eye, that David Cameron promised in his election manifesto in 2010 he would give the people of Britain a referendum if he won the election. It could have been a major point for people putting their mark in the wrong box. As you can see his promises were never met. 

Now it is 2017 by which he is hoping to be elected again. Would the public fall for another promise which might or most probably might not be kept again?  In General the public had the worst austerity and nothing but false promises. It might change now because the election is coming closer.

UPDATE:  22 June 2013 --  David Cameron put now an IN/OUT referendum to the vote of House of Commons MPs. The many stages are called reading and the first reading of IN/OUT was almost unanimously voted for OUT. The second reading for 2017 was turn down by the majority. Everybody demands it now and had been demanding it for long time. David Cameron dragged it out and now it is too late for passing it through the various stages to be effective before the general election in 2015. It was nothing but a election stunt and Cameron thought he could get away with it.Now he will sign another treaty for seven years throwing tens of billions of pounds to an EU which nothing but squanders money by the millions and billions. Well done Mr Cameron.

UPDATE:  4 April 2013 -- Does David Cameron really still believes he can retrieve the power from Brussels or is he only trying to blind the public to stretch the time till he can sign for another seven years? The public is up in arms and wants out because of the money wasted in 

At long last David Cameron announced his true intention of not having an in/out referendum on EU. It was revealed during the PRIME MINISTER QUESTION TIME.

The House of Commons has a rule of having a Prime Minister Question time in Parliament where he has a duty to be accountable to the British People when he is questioned by MPs. The Speaker of Commons points at the MP who had raised his/her hand and is then allowed to put his/her question forward.  Prime Ministers can be evasive but still have to answer the question.

Mr Cameron did not comply with this rule when asked by the Labour MP Chris Bryant about the links between Downing Street and Mr Murdoch. Mr Cameron’s answer was that until he receives an apology for accusation he will not answer the question. This was against the rules of the Parliament but Mr Cameron, not so surprisingly, got away with it because the Speaker John Bercow did not call David Cameron out of order and made him answer the question. 

.

It was totally out of order because the very name Prime Minister Question Time says it all and is part of democracy.

Then Labour MP Natasha Engel put the question to Mr Cameron that Education Secretary Michael Gove stated if there would be a referendum on in/out of EU, he would vote to leave.  She asked the Prime Minister how he would vote.

This time Mr Cameron answer was that he does not want an in/out referendum because he is not happy to leave the EU. At long last Mr Cameron speaks his true intention as before he was hedging all the time.  No wonder the press calls him ‘Dodgy Dave’.  A Prime Minister is there to state openly his intention and inform the public. And not dodging and diving, thinking the public does not see it.

He has done the same with signing papers granting Scotland the right for an in/out referendum of the United Kingdom. Soon after that he stated that he does not want Scotland to leave which is completely contradictory.  Deep down he does want Scotland to leave because there is the majority of Labour voters which would or could dip the scale in the next general election.

Regarding the EU Mr Cameron stated further that he thinks the majority of the public wants a new settlement with the EU. The new settlement will be in a referendum put to the people to vote on. It will also be put into his next manifesto. Mr Cameron safe yourself for both, the time and paper. As he so arrogantly put it that the ‘majority’of people will not vote on either of it.

Mr Cameron also enlightened the public that he intends to put it into his manifesto which is  a pledge to seek  to negotiate the repatriation of significant powers from Brussels. This will be followed by a new referendum to choose between the “new deal” and the status quo. However, there will be no mentioning of in/out of the EU on the pallet papers.

Doubtfully these pledges and promises would stop the Tories’ MPs migrating to the UKip who are determined about the in/out vote.  Mr Cameron still thinks that he can smokescreen with fine words and pledges. The public never seen one pledge fulfilled from the last election manifesto. Also the words to pledge to seek negotiation to repatriate powers from Brussels are to thin to be believed.  Mr Cameron seems to be turning more and more into a man who convinces himself during his speeches and feels full of pride about having delivered a great speech but as they say "action speaks louder than words".

REMEMBER CAMERON'S SPEECH AT PARTY CONFERENCE 2012 == Update 3 October 2014

UPDATE: 3 October, 2014 -- In spite of it all the previous promises by PM David Cameron about the NHS which is by now half privatised. To emphasized it more the PM David Cameron spoke of his disabled son Ivan who died. Why does he speak about his son Ivan he does not show he means it?  At his speech at the Conservative Conference in Birmingham he promised again to increase the budget of the NHS and will not privatise it. He and his great Chancellor George Osborne also promised further cuts in benefits.  Promises,  promises and nothing but contradictions apart from the promises of cuts.



UPDATE 15 OCTOBER 2012 --  There are at the moment 1,000 disabled people who died because of the Disability Benefits being taken away. Some might not be the cause altogether but it is still too high a number to justify David Cameron's actions.

Well, people know now what to expect even he wrapped it up all in a fine worded speech with all emotional points. Hopefully the public will not be blindfolded either by Boris Johnston given them all a cheerful time, he too has that same believes and outlook as David Cameron.

David Cameron spoke about his son and father, both being disabled.  Yes, it must have been distressing and nobody will deny that but having experienced it so closely why does he cuts cold bloodedly the disabled people's benefit. It does not add up. Especially they have it much harder then David Cameron's father, being a multi-millionaire; they have to battle with the money and every penny counts.

He spoke of the Paralympics how wonderful and inspiring these athletes were but coming from David Cameron it is hypocritical. No doubt the athletes were but how can anyone sit there watching their determination to overcome the disability and cut their Disability Benefits at the same time. He is hitting and hurting the poorest of the poor. Yet again, he emphasised it in his speech that there will be austerity and further cuts have to be made. Therefore, these words about his son and father ring hollow and he never applies austerity and cuts to himself and the rest of them.

He was willing to spend £206million (updated £1billion) on a contract with a French firm ATOS not even an English company to create jobs. To send disabled people back to work. 32 (updated over 1,000) people died because of it and with 3million unemployment where have disabled people got a chance to get employed. 

==================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU.
==================================================

He spent £330.000 on a contract with a company organising wake-up calls for youngster to get them out of bed and back to work. Again where are the jobs? The majority would not be at home lying in the bed if there were any jobs available. 

He spent hundreds of million of pounds on a management consultancy to sack nurses and doctors at the NHS. Yet, if necessary at all it should have been the directors’ job of the NHS; there again if he spend that money on the NHS there would be no need to sack nurses and doctors.

There is a whole string of mismanagement were all of a sudden the money was there to be spend all the wrong way and that is were austerity should start.

Apparently David Cameron will still carry on with his original plan. The truth is that the ordinary people are already so cut down, there is no money to be cut. Already the food parcels are on a big increase which is a disgrace for a country and its people like Britain. . Unemployment is growing at an alarming rate.  After years in office the country has a 0.4 per cent deficit instead of yet another promise growth of 0.2 per cent but David Cameron talks of healing process. Where does this man gets it from? He still blames the Labour and yet the Gordon Brown handed the country over with a 1 per cent credit which vanished within two months.

He was talking about sink or swim. Well it is the ordinary people who sink and David Cameron and the Conservatives do the swimming. The party faithful gave him a standing ovation because they swim with him. This party keeps splitting the public into two sections and with a great gulf between it. Therefore, his famous phrase ‘we are all in this together’ he would not know what hit him if he had to cope with what he hands out to people.

The promise of a referendum after the next election is nothing but a promise again to catch votes. If he would mean it he would have done it all this time or at least now. He already promised it in the last election manifesto and when it came to it dropped it.

CAMERON PROMOTES ANOTHER FRIEND Update 18 Nov.,, 2017

Update 18 Nov., 2017 - Reading through this old report nothing has changed. PM May is the same and Margaret Thatcher was the same - Good Old Tories!!!!! It gives us a glimpse how they work to the extend that even a newly created constituency was created to bring him in. He is now a Parliamentary Private Secretary to PM May. 

GEORGE HOLLINGBERY MP
 FOR MEON VALLEY HAMPSHIRE -- 
A NEWLY CREATED CONSTITUENCY !!!!!

It had been noticed that David Cameron gathers nothing but friends round him in his government.  Most of them are old pals from Eton and whose parents already wealthy, obviously.

This time he promoted the tycoon MP George Hollingbery in the last months reshuffle.There was even a newly created constituency made available for him. Mr Hollingbery became Home Secretary Theresa May’s Parliamentary Private Secretary. He is only two years in Parliament which makes it a bit obvious.

Mr Hollingbery made his money or better said fortune with selling off his Companion Care chain of vet’s surgeries. It has not been revealed how he was able to finance to set up the chain in the first place.

======================================================================
IF YOU SEE AN ADVERT OF INTEREST TO YOU PLEASE CLICK ON IT FOR DETAILS
======================================================================

Mr Cameron became close friends and spent several holidays at the North Cornwall cottage belonging to Mr Hollingbery. The cottage is in a high society area near Pladstow and the area has now been nicknamed  Chelsea-on-Sea.

This move had been heavily criticised as another example of David Cameron being out of touch and only happy with his own circle of friends which for a Prime Minister should not be at all. It is further believed that Mr Cameron is trying to bring up Mr Hollingberry through the ranks.  Mr Cameron even received a criticism from the party chairman Norman Tebbit pointing out Mr Cameron only runs his government with chums.

A remark was being said by one of the insider that David Cameron looks after his mates but if your face does not fit, forget it.

What is the man thinking of doing? Surely he must know that it will not do him any good with the voters not being that stupid not to notice it. Is he purposely doing it so that he can retire and receive and live on his pension of an ex-Prime Minister for £500,000 plus all his other businesses to be sure? His action which is totally baffling must make sense somewhere.

JIMMY SAVILLE ACCUSED BIGGEST CHILD MOLESTER -- Updated: 27 March 2015

In my opinion Jimmy Saville must have had some very important evidence of a or more top people to be covered up to such an extent and the full truth has still not come out. Nor does the Government dare to take off his knight hood. So was the evidence being pass on to his family because they objected to it and got it. He was also very closed to Margaret Thatcher and makes you wonder did she not know?

UPDATE:  27 March 2015 -- The truth is coming out more and more. It had already been hinted that Saville and a number of others had been protected from way up on the top.  Was it the top of the Tory Party  which was in government at that time and again does not let the investigation go ahead? This is disgraceful for covering up something so vile.  They are still trying to cover up but the whole truth will be coming  out and hopefully soon. Westminster still closes its door and protect them. Any other paedophile whether celebrity or not is searched, questioned and in court but for politicians.  It is disgusting.

UPDATE:    6 August, 2014 ---  Due to other big headlines like Israel the monstrous scandal of Saville had died but it should not. If we look even more at the sickening scandal there must have been somebody from right on the top who covered him. Even the BBC's top directors could not have held that lid down. So why keep covering it still up? Those victim he destroyed their lives  deserve the full truth and a closure. Beside why is his knighthood still not taken off? Only because his family say so. From a start they should be ashamed to stand up for such creep.

UPDATE: 27 MARCH 2013 -- The real scandal is and lies with the top people who knew about it for decades and did nothing about it.  Most properly will never be prosecuted as always. That is were the real filth and disgust lies. They might not even turn a hair about those  young lives  lost and ruined forever.

UPDATE 15 DECEMBER 2012 -- In the meantime the cases increased to 500 and four celebrities    were also named. Apparently to other celebrities and staff at the BBC it was quite widely known. To keep it quiet till he died is a disgrace.

UPDATE 15 OCTOBER 2012 -- By now there are 340 cases to be investigated. BBC launched an inquiry.  

UPDATE - 3 OCTOBER 2012  In view of the accusations it is now being debated to take off his title 'Sir'. Whether they will decide to do so or not the point is that it had been quite widely known. Although the scandal was kept under cover but it was known at top level therefore he should have never received his knighthood  in the first place. It should be also disclosed who nominated him?

Reading this report it is a shocking revelation. Jimmy Savile supposed to have molested children of about 14 years of age. It was pointed out that it is unfair because he is not around to defend himself. That is one good point but the other point is that there too many telling the same story and too many stating that people in the BBC and Radio knew about it but in those days it was not so easy to prove it and victims were not believed because he was a great celebrity.

Looking back it makes you realise that the world has change a little bit for the better. There seem to be more openness and transparency. A great help was Ester Rantzen when she open the ChildLine where children can ring in confidence.

Jimmy Savile seemed to be been very clever in covering his tracks. He done an awful lot of charity and for that he was celebrated but apparently he also used it when threatened to be exposed. He raised over £40 million for the Stoke Mandeville Hospital alone which was an enormous lot of money especially in those days. At one occasion he told a colleague that he would stop campaigning for the fund for Stoke Mandeville Hospital which is much specialised for spine injuries and paralysed people. Naturally the man backed off because how can you risk that and have it on your conscious.

On another occasion a woman phoned the police five years before Jimmy Savile died and told them that she was abused by him. The police transferred the case to the Crown Prosecution Service but they threw it for not having enough evidence to prosecute the abuser.

The BBC is now accused of knowing about it and these incidences happen at their premises. Quite a number of people who had been around in those days in the Seventies and Eighties admit that is was widely known he targeted young girls. Savile was clever to know that it was the victims' words against his. He mixed with all the types of politicians, including Margaret Thatcher, and celebrities. He spent 13 Christmas with Margaret Thatcher and her family at Chequer the country seat for prime ministers. All this gave him a high profile and a status as national icon which he exploits to its maximum.

No doubt in his profession he was great. He was the first club DJ, originated the ‘Top of the Pops’ which went of up to these days and was a great success from the beginning. Also the programme on the BBC 'Jim'll Fix it' was a great success. He made dreams come true for very ill children or disabled children.

As mentioned at the beginning that the only good thing came out of that victims of rape or child abuse are believed today. In that the world has changed for the better. Especially child abuse the victims had to live with it for decades and hardly anybody would have believed them especially the police took convincing and the victim had to go through another ordeal. Therefore, many children would not report it and lived with it thinking it was their fault which was the attitude in those days.