BREMAIN LETTER FROM THE UK GOVERNMENT - Update 19 March, 2016

UPDATE: 19 March, 2016

A report from the Government warns people that it would costs £6,400 for every family to exit the EU. Another scaremongering?

In my opinion it would be one payment  only while the EU membership payments would continue at £19billion a year plus the continuous demands of other extra payment from Brussels.

The latest is a demand for £500million to Turkey to compensate for the refugee crisis there. Altogether Turkey will receive £4,2billion divided amongst EU members

Why is Brussels not closing its border like Australia and USA? Is it another money spinner for Brussels?

A letter was sent to all UK chief executives urging them to sign it to remain in the EU. It was written by 10 Downing Street pointing out it will risks job loses, trade and safety for Britain.

Corporation like BT, Marks and Spencer, Vodafone, Heathrow airport, BAE, Easyjet and BP signed amongst 36 out of the 100 registered in FTSE.

Other bosses are of the opinion it is not their place to tell the public how to vote Ladbroke, Persimmons, Intercontinental Hotels, Barclays and Provident Financial.

Regarding the scaremongering of losing the EU Market it has to be pointed out that Britain is a long standing World Trader and therefore it is doubtful it will be a great trade collapse as forecast.

Richard Tice, co-founder of LEAVE-EU said:” Downing Street has admitted using taxpayers’ money (how else) and ‘applying pressure’ on FTSE chairmen and chief executives to sign the letter.”

The letter stated: “PM had secured a commitment from the EU to reduce the burden or regulation, deepen the single market and to sign-off crucial intern trade deals.”

The signatories added: “Business needs unrestricted access to the Europe market of 500 million people in order to continue to grow, invest and create jobs. Britain will be strong, safer and better off remaining a member of the EU.”

The arguments against these statements are – Have not seen any of it so far on the contrary the job losses are by the thousands although the Government white-washing the number by Zero-hours contracts and various other methods. The people still remain unemployed.

Where was the EU when the British Steel industry collapsed? Reportedly Mr Cameron could have got a grant from the EU (or did he get one) but went to China instead and signed a contract for two Nuclear Power Stations.

Germany, France and Italy stopped cheap import of Chinese Steel to safe their steel industries and got a grant from the EU.

Regarding being safer – Britain got involved in an unprecedented migration crisis because of the EU open border policies and even now the EU will not close their border around Europe

European Court of Human Rights running British Law in the UK

The endless red-tapes almost suffocate UK businesses; regulation ruined fishing industry because of their quotas from Brussels. If it is over the quota the fishermen have to throw overboard dead fish. Does that make sense?

UK fisher boats stay in the harbour because having fished their quota while French, Dutch, Danish and Iceland fishing in UK’s waters Does that make sense?

Britain was always a big free trade nation but now the EU rules over it. Over the decades Brussels was introducing one regulation after another and by now runs the trade, law and immigration.

No doubt in the background is the USA which wants a United Europe and eventually to dominate it. Mr Obama is not visiting the UK for nothing and it has already been announced to persuade the public to vote “yes” for EU membership to be continued.

The EU Membership costs the British public £350million a week.  The NHS would be well financed. People would have jobs if invested in factories and it would stop homelessness plus reduce the cost of Welfare.

Mr Cameron is running around to receive a convincing new agreement with the EU and convince the public to vote to stay in the EU.

Brussels already announced that any agreement can be ripped-up at any times.  In other words if the public voted to stay in the EU the agreement can or would be torn-up. 

There is also the EU promise for more regulation will be issued, plans for a closer union, and the Government will have no power over its borders or Law.

Why is Mr Cameron kidding himself and the public?

The other point which Mr Cameron is using the Pound dropping in value against the dollar. The facts are the FTSE 100 is dropping drastically every day since his election and virtually no sign of his election promise of a better economy.  Another broken promise.

BRITAIN STILL SELLS WEAPONS TO SAUDI ARABIA USED IN YEMEN

even after Cameron resigned and Theresa May became Prime Minister

PM May will certainly persuade the Saudis in that fetching outfit, flashing her knobbly knees. to buy weapons. Everybody knows Saudi Arabia has the strictest dress code but she ignores it. No manners.

Human Right Groups accuses the British Government of fuelling the civil war in Yemen.

The British Government is supplying Saudi Arabia with arms which are used in Yemen. At the same time it donated £275million to the war-torn country.

Both countries do nothing but double-dealings. All the Middle Eastern countries seem to get into war due to interference from other countries. At the same time they supply arms and give Foreign Aids which are nothing but hypocrisy.  To crown it all they go to meeting after meeting to achieve peace in these countries in the Middle East. What kind of politics is it?

Britain surely must be aware or should be aware that their weapons are used by the Saudis in Yemen. 

The bloody civil war started in March 2015 with the Houthi’s rebels seized the country capital SANA’A. They were backed by Iran.

Since then the Saudi-led coalition of SUNNI Arabian Countries has been bombarding Houthi-held territories in Yemen.

In September the exiled President Abd-Rabbu Mansur returned to the country from Saudi Arabia.

Today, the British Government admitted that they were aware of the use of British weapons against civilian by Saudi Arabia.

Amnesty International UK and Safeworld received legal advice from Professor Philipe Sands QC, Professor Andrew Clapham QC and Blinne Ni Ghralaigh of Matrix Chambers.

All three lawyers were consulted by Amnesty International UK and Safeworld voiced unanimously the opinion that the UK was in cross violation of a number of arms exports agreement.

The lawyers said: “Any authorisation by the UK of the transfer of weapons and related items to Saudi Arabia …. in circumstances when such weapons are capable of being used in the conflict in Yemen, including the support its blockade of Yemen territory, and in circumstances when the end use is not restricted, would constitute a breach by the UK of its obligation under domestic European and International Law."

Downing Street denied the accusation.

Nevertheless, the Prime Minister David Cameron had been questioned several times regarding his closed relationship with Saudi Arabia. After all the Saudis were accused of playing a double sided game by supplying  terrorist groups across the Middle East and committing serious Human Rights violations at home.

Mr Cameron insisted that Saudi Arabia is an ally by keeping Britain safe.

On Channel 4 he said in October: “We received from them important intelligence and secret information that keeps us safe. The reason we have the relationship is our own national security.”

One comment opposes the other of which, we the public, cannot judge and establish the truth. However the evidence remains that over 2,000 civilian including 400 children died since March 2016. And 1.4 million people have been displaced within the country. The country has always been poverty stricken and now relies almost entirely on humanitarian assistance.

Again the question has to be asked. £275million is an awful lot to be received every year, especially in Yemen’s currency.  By now Yemen should have been lifted out of their poverty years ago.

So where does the money go?


Daily Express

THATCHERITE TONY BLAIR STAY AWAY FROM LABOUR -- Update: 28 Nov., 2016

HE EVEN WROTE A BOOK 
ABOUT HIS 
'GLORIOUS' CAREER 
AND CASHED IN ON IT

UPDATE 28 Nov., 2016 --
He even had the nerve to give speeches in the USA charging £100,000 each. Now, after the Chilcot report was published the demand for his speeches seemed to have tried up.

Tony Blair, belief or not, wants to come back into politics. As a MP he would receive £74,000 pa all expenses paid. Does he ever get enough?

UPDATE: 7 July, 2016 --
The Chilcot report is published today and is no white-wash. Although it does not actually name Tony Blair because then he could have got into court but the report states that it was illegal.

Tony Blair  had many warnings that there are no WMD but he also had reports twisting the truth.

Blair did not check them out and went ahead. He did not consult the Privy Council, MPs or people and sent the troops very ill equipped into Iraq. It caused many more deaths than necessary.

Now, Tony Blair said sorry and at the same time "He would do it again".  It is contracting his "Sorry", twisted the knife in the heart of families who lost their sons and the remark was totally unnecessary because he will not get the chance again.

If he is not at the International Crime Court at The Hague he should certainly be banned from politics and any public speaking.

First pretending to be Labour but he is really a Thatcherite. Second to invade Iraq and Afghanistan illegally and still insists he would do it again. At the back of death and destruction he accumulate a wealth of £100million. He is not worth knowing.

UPDATED:  30 August, 2015 -

After a track record of started two illegal wars Tony Blair had the thick never to say: "That Labour has to come to its senses." According to his statement Jeremy Corbyn is dreaming of a "Alice in Wonderland." 


Tony Blair should not and has no right to open his mouth  and pass criticism.

UPDATE: 6 March, 2015 -- Tony Blair gave each of the 106 MPs a £1,000 to fight to win the General Election.  They should give it back because it is nothing but blood on it and he is a Thatcherite in other words two faced. It would not be a surprised if he spies for the Tories.  Personally I would not trust him as far as I can throw him. Due to his two illegal wars the people are under threat in the UK as they never have been before, by terrorism.

Tony Blair should stay away from Labour and especially from its campaign.  The moment the General Election campaign started Tony Blair seems to be popping up in the pictures.  W H Y?  Has he not done enough damage to Labour? In the meantime he dropped his mask and by now it is well known that he is a Thatcherite  Therefore he can only do more harm to Labour or is that his indention to help his Tories?  He is definitely no Labour man and everybody knows it.

From a start to bring the country into the Afghanistan and Iraq war with a lie is not the way Labour is known for.  He caused hundred of thousand of death and maiming. Has he still not the conscience to stay well out of sight and politics? Now we have the aftermath that Britain is on the blacklist of the IS and any moment there could be atrocity on the streets of Britain thanks to Tony Blair and David Cameron. The £10million Iraq Inquiry the papers have not be made public after six years and amongst the people who prevented it was Tony Blair's name. The £10million was again paid by the taxpayers. Furthermore, since the public paid for it it the result should be given to them. It is their property.

Today, the Government pays £20million compensation. This is not a criticism on Iraqi people receiving compensation; it is a criticism of the Government paying it with taxpayers' money instead of Tony Blair. It is estimated that Tony Blair has a wealth of around £100million. He denies it, of course, but even his friends stated that it is an underestimation. Whatever wealth he possess he should pay the £20million compensation because he started the war on a lie.

After he was moved out of Labour he still receives £465,000 a pension for his lies and deceits. He aught to be ashamed to take it especially when he straight away got a post as a Middle-East Peace Envoy which is a joke after declaring war on Afghanistan and Iraq. What is the UN thinking of?

Apparently he has built up his own  business empire in the meantime by holding talks, advising business deals, properties and so on which by now amounts to £57million. Is he also at Labour HQ on an advisory job? It would not be surprising?

Whatever he is up to it would be advisable that Ed Miliband dissociates himself from Tony Blair and his double dealings and sly manners. In my opinion he might even be there to find out and inform his Tory friends.

TROOPS HAVING TO RELY ON LOAN SHARKS

PRIME MINISTER
DAVID CAMERON 

This is another reason why the Tories should never come into power again. To pay the soldiers such a low wages that they get into depth and have to rely on loan sharks is despicable.  People who risk their lives and some die unnecessarily for a war which has nothing to do with Britain should at least receive a decent wage 

It also bound to play on their minds when they are in the front line fighting the Taliban. How can they be concentrating on their job? It bound to put some into danger or their comrades. They should have no financial worries at all when they out there and their mind is in peace that their family is well provided for.

The report states that it is not a few hundred who might have lived it up too much but thousands who did not live a life on the top but have to use loans sharks. It proves that the family back home cannot manage while the “Elite” is rolling in money.  The same people, who order them to fight in Afghanistan, were stopped by vote to enter Syria’s civil war and most probably will now get involved in Iraq.  These men and women are all right to do their dirty work but paying them properly so that they have not to use loan sharks which charges 1,734 per cent they are not all right for that.

===================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU.
==================================================

One thing has to be said here the US looks after its soldiers when they returned wounded far better than Britain. They get the best of treatment and places to recover which all the facilities possible. Mr Cameron does not take an example there.  USA also has established an Armed Forces credit union and US’s Navy Federal to help its four million American military personnel.  Furthermore, it is all state funded and have not rely on endless charities functions to get just the basic treatment, like in the UK.  This government has a lost to answer for.

This government aught to be ashamed but it is known they have no such emotions. Neither do they feel about the millions in the UK living under the bread line. They are so callous that they are even thinking of forbidding the food banks. If they do that there will be people either starved to death like in Dickinson time or such uproar they will never forget it.

Even Margaret Thatcher never got the country down so far as to the troops having to use loan sharks to survive or having hundreds of food banks established.  

In my opinion David Cameron is the worst Prime Minister and his Government since Victorian times.

BRITAIN'S £10BILLION FROM PROSTITUTION AND DRUGS -- Updated: 20 Sept.,2014

CHANCELLOR GEORGE OSBORNE

UPDATED:  20 Sept., 2014   --  This money coming from vile sources is planned to be included into the economy, now in the autumn budget. Desperately to show an increase in the economy.

Prostitution as such is not forbidden in the UK but curb-crawling, pimps, brothels are against the law. Yet, the Treasury accepts £10billion taxes coming from drugs and prostitution businesses which is against the law. 

This very fact explains why the Coalition is not fighting the drug lords. It is another shocking eye opener about the tactics of this Government. How much dirt is tolerated in Westminster or quietly encouraged? Prostitution had been around as long as human beings and most probably drugs too but it does not mean to tolerate it and on the quiet encouraging.  Especially drugs do destroy the younger generation and either they die of it or commit crimes like burglary and murder.

No the worst comes from the EU. They demand that the £10billion income must be included in the Office of National Statistics in Britain’s economy.  This dirty market is seen as a massive boost to Chancellor George Osborne raising the GDP. To get down to the correct figure statisticians will assess the rental value of brothels, sales of condoms and sales of clothes for sex workers.

 Regarding illegal drugs, the ONS will need he figures of production and sales of crack cocaine, powder cocaine, heroin, cannabis, ecstasy and amphetamines.  The information will include growing drugs or importing them as “production”. The buying of them for home use will be classed as “expenditure” and the sale as “income”.  This reads like a leaf out of the accounts from the Mafia.

This Coalition did nothing but ruined Britain and now they reveal trade of the worst. They get Britain down to the countries in Asia like Thailand which unfortunately was ruined by the American Army and now has a name for prostitution and drugs.

Can this Coalition, mainly the Tories, sink any lower? After this announcement of prostitution and drug trade seen as a boost to the economy is they really opened up the last door to being the worst.

It explains it all why the Border Agency does not act on tip off of drug mules.  According to the police’s reports it is as much as 2,000 a day.  According to the ONS it was already in 2009 an estimated £10billion for both trades. The real figure will never been known.

According to PM David Cameron in one of his recent speeches was promise that he will bring back power from Brussels. Is that what he was thinking of? Again Brussels dictates to the United Kingdom to include prostitution and drug trades in the ONS and this Government sees it as a boost to the economy. This mentality and non-existing principles makes every person in the street throw up.

This news  shows the “Government” for what they really are.  There was always prostitution and drug trade but to encourage it and use it as trade to boost the economy is unacceptable.  It can not be repeated often enough and soon enough to use your vote and not let it be wasted.  Use it wisely so Britain will get back to what it was a proud and decent country.

CAMERON'S SPEECH ON EU'S MEMBERSHIP- Update 13 April,2013

PM DAVID CAMERON

UPDATE: 13 April, 2013 --  UK Prime Minister David Cameron is this weekend at the German Chancellor Angela Merkel's official country seat to hold further discussion about the EU membership. Will it make any difference? NO, apart from getting out of the EU it will be always more than costly which the taxpayers have to foot the bill and they are more than cash strapped. They are so badly off that a great majority have to decide whether to buy food or heat their homes.   It is a disgrace to cut down incomes and benefits to that extend. 

UPDATE:  25 January 2013 -  Well, well, well, Brussels really showing its teeth now.  They threatening  the UK to fine it a £250,000 a day because they haven't applied their full law on gas and electricity. According to the Department of Energy it would make the electricity and gas bills even higher. Or is it another story trying to justify another increase?

If any one still had any doubts about getting out of the EU they surely must change their opinion now. Furthermore, Brussels will also control the press and journalists will be fined heavily if they don't comply with their rules. Well, free press was always the mark of the Western World.

IT WAS NOTHING BUT A VOTE CATCHING SPEECH  AND FULL OF HOLLOW PROMISES.

The long awaited speech of David Cameron was finally delivered. Yet, there was nothing new in it. Everybody is aware that Mr Cameron does not want to get out of the EU.

He did make a great point about given the public the referendum they had been demanded for a long time but it is not the straight forward IN/OUT referendum. He still wants to sneak in his hopefully newly achieved condition. He still thinks he can persuade Brussels to give Britain back certain powers which they took off this country. He couldn’t have heard or listen to the announcement from Brussels that they will not do anything like that because otherwise all the other countries will demand changes in their rules as well.

Even after Merkel quickly reassured David Cameron that she will try and negotiate on behalf of Britain to change Britain’s mind not to exit the EU. The point here is that Merkel wants to keep Britain in the EU for not to lose the contribution and if necessary another bail-out. It is not only Merkel’s negotiation but the other 28 countries have also to agree. This makes it most unlikely. Furthermore, Merkel knows if Britain exits the EU others will follow.

However, whether Merkel, David Cameron or Mr Obama want to keep Britain in the EU or not it is the people who should have given the opportunity for a long time to decide.  The Conservative promised to give an IN/OUT referendum in their last election manifesto but as all their other promises it was not kept. It was promised again for March 2011 but again nothing happen.

The public elects a party to govern the country but it is the public’s wishes the leader supposed to carry out. It is wrong that David Cameron thinks Britain should be kept in the EU and therefore ignores the people’s wishes.

The speech today was a waste of ink, paper and time. The people knew his attention already and to tangle a carrot in front of the public’s noses about an in/out referendum but also with some included decision of new regulations and after the next election was all totally unsatisfactory.  The public is not that naïve any more when is David Cameron delivering a speech with concrete facts and stands by it?

People wanted an in/out referendum now and not after he signed another treaty soon for the next seven years. Brussels interfered enough with the Law and justice which cost a fortune on legal aid and benefit; with the fishery to throw dead fish overboard because it was already over the quota; to give French fishermen the right to fish in British waters; having to pay Child benefit for children not even living in Britain; fruit having to be unformed seizes and tonnes of fruit being wasted; and many more other crazy ideas and made law but the best is yet to come. Brussels plans to control the press and journalists will be find if they step over the rules.

BRITAIN GETS ALL THAT FOR ITS EU MEMBERSHIP WHICH COST A FORTUNE AT A TIME WHEN FAMILIES HAVING TO GO TO FOOD BANKS TO SURVIVE. 

The people want out of it and at the same time want to save the money since Britain is in an economic recession and yet David Cameron refuses.  This policy does not make sense.

WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON?

CHILD ACTOR BEN FELLOWS REMEMBERS CESSPITS -- Update 25 Jan., 2015

BEN FELLOWS AND HIS WIFE JULIA

UPDATE: 25 January, 2015 -- After naming Ken Clarke he is now in court for perverting the cause of justice. The case will be heard by Mr Justice Sweeney at the Old Bailey. Mr Fellows will appear on 20 March, 2015 to a plea hearing and a two week trial will take place in July.   Why was Ken Clarke not arrested and questioned like all those accused celebrities?

Even Scotland Yard found allegedly five paedophile rings in Westminster and investigate three allegedly murders of your boys. The handed in paedophile files to Leon Brittan are missing but surely there must be copy. Nobody would not keep a copy of such an important file. Is there, yet again, another cover up and the owner threatened not to use it?

By now the public is aware of a reluctance of dealing with accusations when it concerns a politician which is totally wrong.  



UPDATE: 29 April, 2014  -  Ben Fellow turned journalist and was working for  TV. He now is fighting for justice to bring paedophiles into courts. He insists that the police covers up politicians and been given orders from above.  He accuses Ken Clarke having abused him about 20 years ago and he wants him to be arrested and charged. To fight the establishment he has gone on hunger strike. According to him he was receiving threatening phone calls in London and lives now in Lanzarote.  When PM David Cameron spent his holidays there Ben Fellow wrote him a letter demanding that Mr Cameron will make sure justice is done. Ben Fellows reckons there are other victims but too scared to come forward.

In the wake of the scandal of Jimmy Savile another actor Ben Fellows came forward and described painfully how he was abused when he was just 13 and a child actor trying to make a name for him selves. He came from a suburb of Birmingham and went against his parents’ wishes to London’s show business. He stayed 
with relatives in London.

======================================================================
IF YOU SEE AN ADVERT OF INTEREST TO YOU PLEASE CLICK ON IT FOR DETAILS
======================================================================

Ben Fellows a starry-eyed teenager was taken through VIP lounges and experienced binge-drinking and drug taking all amongst big name celebrities.  The high live hit him like a tone of bricks and he never realised the dangerous undercurrent.  

When the scandal about Savile broke lose he decided he should give facts and figures about the culture of corruption at the very centre of Britain’s entertainment.

Looking back he realised that he was used as a member of a very sinister and secret club in which young actors like him were used and abused like trophies.  The main members in this disgraceful world were all and still are household names.

He added that it is unbelievable being bedded by a current female BBC employee working in children’s entertainment. He was only 15 years old and snorted cocaine with one of Britain’s famous stars and regular on TV.

He was regularly wanted by married actors wanting young boys and almost raped in a low-class hotel room by one of the most well known TV stars of the eighties.

When he saw friends getting dragged into the seedy world of abuse, drugs, drinks and sexual abuse by empty promises he started to wake-up and got off it. However, at the age of 15 he was a regular at Springfellows at Café de Paris and Atlantic Bar and Grill. At that age you are not responsible for your action and there is always the danger if you say no you will be dropped.  He remembers a list of directors, actors, casting directors, writers, executives and producers who did or attempted to abuse him.

He spoke about a house party given by the BBC executives with a huge crowd of stars and hangers on. He still sees it as the worst abuse of trust and power. In 1990 in Clapham when a 15 year old Ben filming Model Millie for the corporation was plied with alcohol and drugs, seduced and shamelessly taken advantage of.

Ben Fellows is 37 years of age and a responsible adult. He is a successful filmmaker and lives in South London.  He stated that it took him 20 years to come to terms with the world he once lived in but with the help of his beautiful wife and supportive family he now is able to cope with the abusive world of entertainment and show business.  He looks at it as a parallel world of a cesspit and inhabited by predators and paedophiles. 

 .

It must have been terrible having to live with such memories. It has to be admired that he now is able to find the courage to cope with it. It is incredible to read about what went on behind the screen and success but at long last it comes into the open and hopefully this cesspit will be stamped out.

Good luck for the future Ben Fellows to you and your family. Be proud of yourself to have been able to get out of it.  

EU PLANS TO PAY MIGRANTS MOVING TO BRITAIN

After the disastrous ruling of the fishery industry where fisherman have to throw almost a third of dead fish overboard because it is over their quota and growing fruit all the same size which needs more chemical spray on it to achieve it plus to grow bananas straight it leaves us wonder about sense of the EU. Now we hear they are working on a new plan whereby jobless people get send to Britain with an incentive of a £1,000. They also could get travel expenses. They also would be paid £250 to help them to be interviewed and £830 for re-location cost.

Is that what Britain gets for its £19billion membership? plus all sorts of other payments.

Surely, it is on the top all their previous brainless rulings and decision. From a start Britain has 2.5million unemployed and amongst them over a one million youngsters who don’t seem to have a chance.  Brussels explanation for this hare brain scheme is that the tax-payers-funded scheme would give thousands of youngsters to move to Britain to seek employment and British youngster could use the scheme to move to the EU to work.

WHERE  IS  THE  SENSE  IN THAT?  Also people will be using the scheme to get money fraudulent.

The scheme is for job seekers age 18 to 30 and will be match with suitable vacancies.

The start has been made in Spain where youth unemployment is over 50 per cent. It will be extended to Germany, Denmark and Italy and eventually across the EU. Their Target is to help 5,000 people gain jobs through the EU scheme.

The statistic shows that tens of thousands of migrant have forced out British worker out of work. Prime Minister David Cameron wants Brussels to re-write the rules that allow Europeans to take jobs in Britain. When Mr Cameron visited two factories in recent weeks he found out that 50 to 60 per cent were people from the EU countries.

Tim Aker who is part of the ‘Get Britain out of the EU’ campaign stated that unemployment caused by the EU should be solved by the EU and not sends to Britain to force British people out of a job.

WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO

Seeing the report of the court case of Dale Cregan made one release what the world has come to. Obviously the police must have known a lot more to go to that length. However, it is shocking that police has to protect them to such an extent.  It made you release what a dangerous world is out there. Already at airport to see police going up and down with these kind of top weapon is very sad.

Yet, when you look back the build-up began decades ago. The main course was drugs trafficking and nobody stopped at the beginning. Various governments turned a blind eye on it and didn't take the drug dealers out. These top criminals were never really challenged and given a life sentence. These mobsters and their gangs grew quietly and nothing was done. The sentence, if any, they'd got was nothing. They must have laughed and carry on.

Nowadays, it is almost out of control and the even softer sentences makes it more ridiculous. These characters have even gone worse and throwing grenades now. They feel nothing or think nothing of shooting or blowing somebody up. From there where will they go next?

While looking for this picture to copy onto my blog I had an even bigger shock. There were adverts on the same page of selling anything what police wear. How can any of the authorities allow this?  Anyone in uniform people would take them for a policeman because they still trust them.

Is that the world people would want to have and even their children to grow up with? I don’t think so.

David Cameron promised in his election manifest they will tough on crime. What happen? They are worse and handing out the worst prison sentence, if any.  Another broken promise. A judge stated that burglars must be very brave people to have the courage to break into house. Good heavens, are they that remote not to see that criminals couldn’t care less? The criminals seem to get more and more off the hook and just to save money on prison sentences. The government doesn’t think that these criminals live on benefit which they could save when in prison. I hope they do not pay those benefits as well.

In the last two or three years it seems heavy crime is accelerating fast. Drugs are being distributed as if they were aspirins. Surely the police must know who these organised gangs are and should raid those times and again. 

Yet while crimes is rapidly increase David Cameron had the bright idea to sack 16,000 police officers who were already more than overwork to keep the crimes down. Ken Clarke closed a prison and bathed in the glory for saving the country money yet the prisons supposed to be overfilled all these years.

All these horrific crimes should be met with the harshest sentence they can find and life should be life. This would deter some criminals and that would be a saving.

REMEMBER CAMERON CHILLAXING

First of all chillaxing is a new word and it was put together by chilling out and relaxing. Just to keep people up to date with the latest.

The public is under the greatest pressure for almost a decade because of the cut back by the government. The real cuts of various benefits has not even had the full impact yet but there seems no end of spending and also wasting money in the government. They should have the greatest austerity because they using and living on taxpayers’ money.

On the trip to Australia for the Commonwealth summit David Cameron vanished again and it was only a two days summit. You would think he would dedicate this very short time to improve the economy. He did the same last year and went on a private tour and tipple to the Sandalford Winery in Swan Valley. The Prime Ministry, apart from other chillaxing, is known for his boozy Sunday.  After all he has to relax after the hard work he does during the week in Parliament.

All together it was a four-day International tour and ended with the Commonwealth summit. David spent £821,000 in four days and most went on a chartered private jet. The Euro crisis was ‘dealt with’ at Brussels and 23 officials flew straight to Australia and were late again as in the year before. The vanishing trip cost the tax payer at least £12,800 pfficially.

Since they went there late already any one would expect that the Prime Minister would use every minute to solve the crises to some extent and met as many other leaders as possible in the short time.

One civil servant who worked there at the time of Gordon Brown and Tony Blair stated that none of them would have ever thought of wandering off to a vineyard. It just shows fully his attitude towards Britain and British people plus the economy. He must be desperate to use the little time he was there to visit a vineyard, have private tour and sample the wines.  If he was so desperate he should have done in his own time and after the summit.

Australia Prime Minister was wondering why Cameron skipped an official dinner and the summit final day. She commented that there is a lot of pressure on people’s time given fully to the issue in the global economy. 

To skip the official dinner and the final day was also an insult to the Commonwealth summit and Australia’s Prime Minister who arranged it all. Such bad manner from a Prime Minister who is the leader of Britain and had high education is unacceptable.

Apparently Mr Cameron did not show a lot of strain at the Sandalford’s private tour and sampled vintage wines of its finest. 

But we don’t want to miss out on the white-wash. Downing Street stated the high cost was because the plane should have gone to Japan, New Zealand and Saudi Arabia instead. Now that is a real reason. Isn't it? This is not an explanation or justification. It shows even more his arrogance to charter a jet which was chartered already to these countries.  

A spokesman stated further that it is important for the Prime Minister to represent the UK at the Commonwealth meeting. Surely he would have impressed them more by flying first class with a scheduled airline. He would have even got there on time and if the Royal family uses first class who the hell does HE thinks he is?  He forgets that he has been voted in by the people and therefore should serves them to his fullest abilities.

This is also not the first time Cameron wondered off. When he was in Chicaco for the Nato summit he done the same thing. He vanished to do some 'shopping'. He seems to be using all these highly important trip just with one thing on his mind to get his private life well feathered. The whole attitude to his duty is unbelievable and unacceptable. He just keeps letting the people down times and times again. 

Yet he keeps getting away with it all the time.

IT   IS   NOTHING   BUT   A   SCANDAL

REMEMBER ELECTION 2010

CAMERON WILL HAVE NOW ANOTHER LAUGH AT US
AND MAY STILL LAUGHING BUT SLOWLY RUNNING OUT OF IT WITH BREXIT

UPDATE:  24, February 2015 ---  Cameron demands the Green Party to take part in the TV Election Programme.  It is surprising so shortly after Farage put his foot in with Paris shooting. All this time Cameron would not have even UKIP in the TV Election Discussion. Is it a new move to ensure a win using the Greens as a standby since he knows the UKIP lost too many voters with Farage showing at long last his real face and the voters also cotton on that UKIP was established as a standby? The UKIP poll must have dropped greatly for Cameron wanting the Green Party there. However, the Green Party did not give a good interview. Is that Cameron's aim?

UPDATE:  13 Oct., 2014  ---  What will it be the next time to force a win for the Tories? PM David Cameron already working on a exclusion of Scottish MPs'vote. If he gets this new law through, as promised, by the end of the year, it will keep 40 Labour MPs from Scotland out. It will be a clear winner for the Tories. The danger comes from UKIP. Even the Leader Nigel Farage was a Tory and by now so many Tories MPs have defected that is looks like a twin which will close up again after the next General Election.  Napoleon once said: "Never trust a traitor." There is a lot of truth in it.  It looks like the UKIP pretends to be an alternative but but too many facts speak against it. 

Farage promise a referendum of YES/NO for EU membership because he knows people want it and they demanded for years but he is a MEP and campaigned and won again.  He promised immigration control which is a bit contradicting being of French ancestry and married to a German  wife. He plays the average Joe but was educating in a top Dulwich school costing £17,000 a year and had been a Tory MP for years.  It was amazing the win in Clacton which was a stronghold of the Tories.  Was it a hand-over to blind the public? Would it be surprising? No.  Is the UKIP a pre-arrangement for if the Tories will not get the majority; the UKIP would top it up? 

Looking at the great mismanagement of the Coalition brought back memories of the scandal surrounding the actual Election 2010.

Surely it never happened before in all its history that at 10 pm the Polling Station was closed on queues of 300 to 500 voters still outside on each station.  Over the years at that time any polling station was getting empty in the last half-an-hour. So what happened this time? Was there purposely a delay?

Voters were furious and senior politician demanded an inquiry. However, as the time went there was never another mentioning of an inquiry and if the public was not informed of the result.

A very obvious fact was that most of the polling stations being closed with hundreds of voters still being outside were mostly in the heartland of Labour. It was polling station like Newcastle, Birmingham, Leeds, Sheffield, Manchester, South Yorkshire, Sutton Coldfield and Leeds. Also in the East End of London and south were there is a strong Labour support.

Before the General Election in 2010 David Cameron and his Tory Party made a contract with the people and promised if they would not keep it the people could kick them out. Well none of it was kept.  Well, what are people waiting for?

Now to analyse it, if we can, is that the Conservative snatched number of seats in the Northern Heartland. Was it due to some organised delay so the queue of the voters would build-up and then waiving the rules and regulation about to be locked out?  It is a very unusual event which never happened before and it  bound to make suspicions grow.

After Margaret Thatcher and friends were in power the country was like dead. No roads were swept, parks not kept and schools and council houses fell into disrepair. The Conservatives managed to bring the country down to 5 million unemployed because Margaret Thatcher destroyed the coal mines, ship building, steel industry and the people had nowhere to go to find work. She won the second and third election on the back of first allowing them to buy their council houses and the second with privatising the rail, electricity and gas and blind folding the people with offering shares in these industries. Soon it started to backfire because with unemployment the people had to sell their homes and lost their deposit and sell back their share with a loss. Nowadays people are suffering with high inflated prices of these industries because the real benefiting shareholders want all the money they can get. Margaret Thatcher only allowed 10 per cent of every privatisation to be sold to the public. Guess where the rest went?

Coming back to the great mess of the last election, it was against the law because every voter over 18 of age has the right to vote. That is democracy and if no inquiry was held which is plausible otherwise the shamble would have come out and the Conservative Party might have to face a different result.

When Labour came into power they took over a country completely on its knees and they brought the country right up to the 21^st century. Only one criticism has to be made that Mr Blair listen too much to Mr Bush and got involve into two illegal wars. 

GORDON BROWN

Mr Brown might not have that flair and showmanship like Toni Blair but he was a great financier and had the country up to 1 per cent GDP during a great economic pressure. Within a month or two Cameron had that demolished and now most properly will have a treble dip recession.

Mr Brown in his last budget had a lot of small increases to help various hard-up people and he would have had the country by now well out of it. He also announced an increase to the budget of the NHS, police, military forces and he would have never have cut tens of thousand of people in these jobs.

It was a cautious but good budget why people turned on Labour or were made to, we will never know

BANK OF ENGLAND IS REGULATING BANKS -- UPDATE 12 June, 2017

UPDATE; 12 June, 2017 -- So far there is no sign of it but it should be done to stop the bankers getting huge profits and fraud.

UPDATE: 10 March 2014 -- It looks doubtful re-regulation will happen under Mark Carney the new head of the Bank of England.  He seems to be very much on the side of the Tories. Although he should not be involving himself in politics and stay neutral.

It is regretful Mr King did not see it through before he retired. It needs to be done to stop the banks paying out 200 per cent bonuses. The major profit, according to newspapers' reports, comes from cancelling major loans and then re-issue them which is again a fiddle and costs the economy billions of pounds. For the Government to trumpet about to bring down the deficit is the biggest, sickest joke of them all.


UPDATE:  10 October 2013 -  Mr King had plans to return to regulate the banks again which stop a lot of fiddles and sky-high bonuses. However, Mr King has retired and the question is will the new head of the Bank of England honour Mr King's intention?

It seems that at long last some powerful officials are waking up to the mismanagement of banks for the last five years. It took them far too long and the damage it caused is far too costly. Ever since the de-regulation made by Margaret Thatcher; the banking system was going down and into a shamble. Before, the banks of England had the highest respect and were the envy of the world.

The non-stop scandals of sky high salaries, bonuses and dividends while the bank was showing a loss were incredible. Now as a final straw came the revelation of the Libor scandal.  Of course, the Barclays bank is not the only one and it is known that most of the major banks were involved. The question of why the Bank of England and the Financial Service Authority never seen it straight away will most properly never be answered.  The FSA did not take any notice of rumours about rigging. Wheatley review into Libor rigging should consider classifying manipulation as market abuse and making it a criminal offence.

A well known columnists stated months ago that these boys should not only be forced out and most properly with a billions of pound golden hand shake which certainly wouldn’t give the right message but they should be in prison and no golden hand shake. What they done is criminal.

Yet, when the Bank of England Governor Sir Mervyn King forced Mr Diamond out of Barclays bank he was heavily criticised by a powerful committee of MPs.  Mr King demanded to take on more powers and is again criticised by the Commons Treasury Committee stating it would be a return to the days where an “all-powerful” Governor could sack top bankers. Something has to be done and urgently and if a Governor goes power mad it is still better then the mess under which the bank operates today.  The mismanagement had certainly had a great bearing on Britain’s economic crises and banks and City are hoodwinking the public.

The Treasury Select Committee, chairman Andrew Tyrie stated: “Urgent improvements, both to the way the banks are run and the way they are regulated is needed if public and marketing confidence is to  be restored.”

Good regulation is needed and has to be build on clear-cut rules and transparency. Whether this will ever come about is hopeful but doubtful. There are too many greedy fingers in banks, city and government who all shared the spoil and they won’t let go that easily if at all.

It is still a secret club where with a number of nudges and winks over a cigar and brandy makes their power rule and the profit fall in their pocket. It had been whispered that banks withdraw credits from companies and set-it-up again and this would show as new business which means bonuses for the bankers. Whether it is true remains to be seen which will never be but it is plausible.

All these double-dealings contribute to high income for a few but brings the economy down which evidence showed over the last few years but didn’t seem to bother the ones responsible.

JULIAN ASSANGE

UPDATE;  10 October 2013  -- Now the biggest insult to Mr Assage comes from the very people who contemn him and make him live in an actual prison for his own safety; making a film of his life. They even ask him to meet the actor Benedict Cumberbatch who will play but Mr Assage refused. Very Wise.  Was it a ploy to get Julian Assage? It would not surprise any one.  

They still accusing Mr Assage and Mr Snowdon but the real accusation should be with the American Government. If they didn't do all wrong there would not be a Mr Assage or Mr Snowdon. These two men saw the wrong doings and could not just stand by and let it pass. The public should stand by them and contemn the government. 



UPDATE:  25 September 2013 -- People forget so easily due to all the new dramas that there is a man Julian Assange still living in hiding because he discovered some truth which the USA feared to come out. What must this man be going through for standing up to the politicians who nothing but twisting the truth to suit themselves? The politicians all over the world can't accept people are more knowledgeable and with persecuting Whistleblowers the politician destroying their credibility. At the moment the belief in and respect for politician is at its lowest.

Why do Britain and other European Countries always dance to the tune of the USA? This attitude got Britain into two unnecessary and illegal wars. Britain used to be a great empire but lost its colonies due time ran out for countries to be colonised. However, it doesn’t mean it is not a great country like all the others countries which lost their empires and colonies.

Therefore Britain and all the other European powerful countries need not to agree with the USA wishes and command.

Julian Assange and his team have opened our eyes to many secret deals and manoeuvre of the USA which did not go down well. Well that is their problem because they should have informed the public more openly and honestly. Especially since the USA always talks about Liberty and Freedom and even enforces it in other countries.

The extradition of Julian Assange for the accusation of rape in Sweden it is nothing but a drummed-up charge and surprisingly Sweden plays along. Again Sweden always gave the impression of freedom. Everybody knows that this rape case is nothing but a smokescreen to get Mr Assange there and from there it must be already agreed between Sweden and the USA to extradite Mr Assange to the USA.  Again why is Sweden getting involved and does as the USA wishes?

Yes, he did get hold of 'sensitive' material and published it but he real reason behind is that Washington tried keep certain dealings a secret and they feel embarrassed. Of course, they classify it as 'sensitive' when they want to hide the truth. Since when is it a crime to publish the truth? To punish it with long term prison or even death that would be a crime and so unjust. Is that what the USA stands for to hide the truth and when it comes out to punish it with prison or even death?

It is high time Britain and the rest of Europe realise that their countries are worth something and begin to be proud of it again. This would then be followed by not to dance to the tune of the USA or any other power but stand up, do what is right and follow your own path.

The USA does not very often oblige with demands coming from Britain and yet there is not half a hullabaloo as with getting Julian Assange extradited.

Speaking for the opinion of the general public hopefully Mr Assange will make it to freedom and Mr Manning. Respect to Ecuador to stand up to the "mighty" USA while all others hide under the table including Britain.