RUPERT MURDOCH RULES UK AND WORLD Update 19 May, 2017

Update - According to a report Rupert Murdoch plays golf with Donald Trump. Is there a high place where Rupert Murdoch is not?

Update 15 May, 2017 --
To be sure Murdoch is already deeply involve in GE2017 making sure Mme May is winning despite of all the hurt and hardship she is piling onto the poor. No effort to retrieve the taxes from tax haven; have a go there if you dare but you would hurt your friends.

It bring so much money back the NHS schools and Social Services deficit paid for. It would even wipe out the £1.7trillion deficit.  

Update 1 Oct., 2016 --
PM Theresa May had a 'private' meeting with Rupert Murdoch when she was in NY, USA. Murdoch still running this country. Was he briefing her for the Conservative Conference tomorrow?

UPDATE 15 July, 2016 --

It was revealed that Liam Fox had lunch with Rupert Murdoch two weeks before his appointment in the Tories Cabinet.

Rupert Murdoch certainly looks as if he is trying to run the UK and the World. He was most instrumental in the run up to the Iraq war.

Headline like "Weapon of Mass Destruction" were screaming from the front page of The Sun, Murdoch's paper. As a matter of fact Iraq was disarming and very badly equipped. They all must have known it and told nothing but lies, causing nothing but death and destruction. Yet they all get away with it.

The taxpayers had to pay £20million as compensation and not Blair who was the instigator. The UK people did not want war with Iraq.

Paul Dacre, editor of the Daily Mail, owned by Murdoch, said at the Levenson inquiry for phone-hacking: "I'm not sure that the Blair government or Tony Blair - would have been able to take the British people to war if it had not been for the implacable support provided by Murdoch's papers. There's no doubt they came from Murdoch himself."

TV channel FOX News, owned by Murdoch, increased its rating to 5,6million prime time with news about Iraq invasion.

Chilcot did not mention those people but their influence was enormous.

Tony Blair's contacts with Washington before Iraq invasion was not approved by everyone.
Donald Rumsfeld did not care whether the British took part or not and Blair was worried that the US would start without Britain. On the evening before Murdoch phoned Tony Blair. The Chilcot report stated that Downing Street has no record on that and it is assume that Blair did not go through the switch board.

Tony Blair's spin doctor, Alistair Campbell, stated that Murdoch "was pressing on timings, saying New International would support us etc. Both Blair and I felt it was promoted by Washington and another example of their over crude diplomacy."

Murdoch has a long standing relationship with US Representatives. 14 years ago he influence public opinion in the US and UK for the invasion of Iraq, mentioning cheap oil. He is now backing Donald Trump. In my opinion another disaster.

Rebekah Wade (now Brooks) was involved in the company in The Sun urging "a swift ad successful war that would prove to the world what a deadly menace Saddam has been for year will cement Blair's place in history."
When Charles Kennedy, Liberal leader, opposing the war The Sun showed him on the front page with a snake in the background with the caption "Spot the difference. One is a spineless reptile. The other is a poisonous snake."

Robin Cook, resigned before the invasion and Clare Short and both were   savaged by his papers.
Brooks resigned when the phone scandal broke in 2011 but was acquitted in 2014. She was re-appointed as CEO in 2015.

Robert Thompson, Australia former editor of The Times supposed to be closer than any other man to Murdoch. He heavily supported the Iraq invasion in 2002 and 2003. In the Chilcot report it was revealed that a message was sent to Jack Straw Private Office in March 2003 stating "the process of preparing media and public opinion for possible action on Iraq is under way."

Thompson left and moved to US where he was editor-in-chief of Down Jones and The Wall Street Journal ( both owned by Murdoch). In 2013 he became chief executive of News Corporation - Murdoch main company covering all the others.

Michael Gove was in 2003 assistant editor at the The Times and so  enthusiastically about an invasion in Iraq it made Tony Blair a peace keeper. In December 2002 Gove wrote: "He condemned the unhappy section of British Left whose antipathy to Western policy makes them Saddam's useful idiots." and asked "Why is that so many of those political creed should be driven by desire to emancipate those who are suffering choose to object to a course of action which would deliver millions from misery?"

He made a name for himself in Brexit and then stabbed Boris Johnson in the back before Friday morning when the outcome was announced Brexit had won. Deciding he would stand as candidate for Prime Minister.

Veteran MP Ken Clark was caught on camera saying about Michael Gove: "With Michael as Prime Minister we'd go to war with at least 3 countries at once."

CAMERON AND BLAIR POLITICAL NON-STARTERS

According to a report in the Daily Mirror PM David Cameron was not the only one who done the initiation ceremony at the Oxford Piers Gaveston Society.

Amongst of many well known people was also ex-PM John Major. According to Edwina Currie he put his honourable member into a different part of the poor pig.

An even more shocking revelation came from Cameron’s Oxford weed-smoking friend James Delingpole. He stated that the Prime Minister has not got a political bone in his body born into high society. 

This statement was confirmed in a biography written by fellow Old Etonian James Hanning and Francis Elliott. They wrote that even though he was at Oxford at the time of Thatcherism, Cameron was not interested in politics but in networking and mounting high-class fillies.

Cameron found a brochure from the careers department and applied to the Conservative Research Department.  Previously he applied to all the blue-chip merchant bankers and management consultants but failed. Weren't they lucky.

He did not get his chance in politics because of a passion for it but the Tory Central Office received an anonymous phone call from Buckingham Palace. The call came before Cameron’s interview and it advised them to take him on. That was the unfortunate start for this country and its people.

Even Robin Harris, who gave him the job regretted it and said: “Cameron was in the category of people who came into the party at the time because they saw it as a way of advancing their careers. He is an out-and-out opportunist. I didn’t believe he believes anything.”

David Cameron’s track record speaks for itself which is devastating to the people and country.

The same goes for Tony Blair who was another privilege kid.  His father was chairman of the local Conservatives and who was a boarder at the Eton of the North. He once stood in a mock election as a Tory.  Blair had no interest in politics while he was at the University.

His real ambition was to be a pop star and was in a band Ugly Rumours. When he met Cherie the daughter of firebrand leftie Tony Booth it all changed.

Both men are exposed for charming the public and party leaders but without real conviction.  People are now drawn to Jeremy Corbyn and Nicola Sturgeon because they have a sincere belief and care for the people.

After one of the biggest election results ever seen. Tony Blair started out all right. He put the UK back on its feet again after Tories brought it to a standstill. His downfall was he listened to Bush and joined two illegal wars.

Tony Blair should have been pulled in for war crimes long ago. To start two illegal wars which cost thousands of lives on both sides is criminal. The money he made during this time should be confiscated. Even amongst his rich friends he is known as the “human cash machine” which tells you everything.

This Tory Government paid £20million to the people of Iraq which is right but it should have been paid by Tony Blair not by the very hard-up taxpayers. He also receives £450,000 pension for being an prime minister. His wealth is estimated to £100million and even his friends say he has more than that.

THATCHERITE TONY BLAIR STAY AWAY FROM LABOUR -- Update: 28 Nov., 2016

HE EVEN WROTE A BOOK 
ABOUT HIS 
'GLORIOUS' CAREER 
AND CASHED IN ON IT

UPDATE 28 Nov., 2016 --
He even had the nerve to give speeches in the USA charging £100,000 each. Now, after the Chilcot report was published the demand for his speeches seemed to have tried up.

Tony Blair, belief or not, wants to come back into politics. As a MP he would receive £74,000 pa all expenses paid. Does he ever get enough?

UPDATE: 7 July, 2016 --
The Chilcot report is published today and is no white-wash. Although it does not actually name Tony Blair because then he could have got into court but the report states that it was illegal.

Tony Blair  had many warnings that there are no WMD but he also had reports twisting the truth.

Blair did not check them out and went ahead. He did not consult the Privy Council, MPs or people and sent the troops very ill equipped into Iraq. It caused many more deaths than necessary.

Now, Tony Blair said sorry and at the same time "He would do it again".  It is contracting his "Sorry", twisted the knife in the heart of families who lost their sons and the remark was totally unnecessary because he will not get the chance again.

If he is not at the International Crime Court at The Hague he should certainly be banned from politics and any public speaking.

First pretending to be Labour but he is really a Thatcherite. Second to invade Iraq and Afghanistan illegally and still insists he would do it again. At the back of death and destruction he accumulate a wealth of £100million. He is not worth knowing.

UPDATED:  30 August, 2015 -

After a track record of started two illegal wars Tony Blair had the thick never to say: "That Labour has to come to its senses." According to his statement Jeremy Corbyn is dreaming of a "Alice in Wonderland." 


Tony Blair should not and has no right to open his mouth  and pass criticism.

UPDATE: 6 March, 2015 -- Tony Blair gave each of the 106 MPs a £1,000 to fight to win the General Election.  They should give it back because it is nothing but blood on it and he is a Thatcherite in other words two faced. It would not be a surprised if he spies for the Tories.  Personally I would not trust him as far as I can throw him. Due to his two illegal wars the people are under threat in the UK as they never have been before, by terrorism.

Tony Blair should stay away from Labour and especially from its campaign.  The moment the General Election campaign started Tony Blair seems to be popping up in the pictures.  W H Y?  Has he not done enough damage to Labour? In the meantime he dropped his mask and by now it is well known that he is a Thatcherite  Therefore he can only do more harm to Labour or is that his indention to help his Tories?  He is definitely no Labour man and everybody knows it.

From a start to bring the country into the Afghanistan and Iraq war with a lie is not the way Labour is known for.  He caused hundred of thousand of death and maiming. Has he still not the conscience to stay well out of sight and politics? Now we have the aftermath that Britain is on the blacklist of the IS and any moment there could be atrocity on the streets of Britain thanks to Tony Blair and David Cameron. The £10million Iraq Inquiry the papers have not be made public after six years and amongst the people who prevented it was Tony Blair's name. The £10million was again paid by the taxpayers. Furthermore, since the public paid for it it the result should be given to them. It is their property.

Today, the Government pays £20million compensation. This is not a criticism on Iraqi people receiving compensation; it is a criticism of the Government paying it with taxpayers' money instead of Tony Blair. It is estimated that Tony Blair has a wealth of around £100million. He denies it, of course, but even his friends stated that it is an underestimation. Whatever wealth he possess he should pay the £20million compensation because he started the war on a lie.

After he was moved out of Labour he still receives £465,000 a pension for his lies and deceits. He aught to be ashamed to take it especially when he straight away got a post as a Middle-East Peace Envoy which is a joke after declaring war on Afghanistan and Iraq. What is the UN thinking of?

Apparently he has built up his own  business empire in the meantime by holding talks, advising business deals, properties and so on which by now amounts to £57million. Is he also at Labour HQ on an advisory job? It would not be surprising?

Whatever he is up to it would be advisable that Ed Miliband dissociates himself from Tony Blair and his double dealings and sly manners. In my opinion he might even be there to find out and inform his Tory friends.

TONY BLAIR SHOULD PAY £20MILLION COMPENSATION NOT TAXPAYERS Update 7 July, 2016

TONY BLAIR

Update: 7 July, 2016 -- Now the Chilcot report proved Blair decided single-handedly to invade Iraq he should be made to pay back £20million to the taxpayers. It is not right the taxpayers foot Blair's compensation to Iraqi people. Taxpayers are starving and homeless. 

This is another incredible decision made by the Coalition. The newspaper The Sun discovered that around £20million of taxpayers money had been paid as compensation to Iraquis since 2003.

The blog is not meant against Iraqis receiving compensation it only objects that taxpayers who are really hard-up having to pay it out.

It should be Tony Blair paying it.  
    .
He was determined to start a war.

He is gathered a wealth of approx. £100million,  maybe even more. They call him a 'human cash-machine' not for nothing, not in those circles. Therefore he must excel himself

  

The general public was completely against the war and invasion in Iraq so why do they have to pay for it. As it is they had to pay hundreds of millions of pounds to fight in Iraq plus  176 UK soldiers  lost their lives and a great number of young men were injured and are disabled for the rest of their lives. Instead of looking after them and paying compensation to these soldiers to make their life more durable the Department of Defence spending around £20million, so far, to Iraq, instead taking Tony Blair to court and make him pay it..

By all means they should get the money but it should not come from the Taxpayers. It should be paid by Tony Blair who was bent over backwards to invade Iraq under the false statement they had Weapon of Mass Destruction which were never found because they were never there. Tony Blair had been said, by financial experts, to be worth at least £100million and his own friends stated that it is under-estimated

Therefore my suggestion and it is not that wild since he was solely responsible for the death and devastation in Iraq he should be held responsible to pay. As it stands  of now he still would have at least £80million which is overpaid for his irresponsibility as a Prime Minister. Besides the war was illegal because the UN did not sanction it. So far he is not held responsible for any of that. On the contrary the UN gave him a post as their official Middle East Peace Envoy. To receive such a post after being the biggest war monger of recent years leave the credibility of the UN in doubt.

Legal companies Leigh Day and Public Interest's Lawyers handle all these cases. At the moment they still have 1,469 cases to bring against the Ministry of Defence. Defence Secretary Philip Hammond accused them of self-interest lawyers hiding behind the accuse of public interest. So far they pocket around £10million.  And what does the great Prime Minister David Cameron and his Cabinet do about it? Nothing. As long it does not cost his money it is all irrelevant. Never mind about the public being screwed into the ground.

INQUIRY INTO THE IRAQ WAR -- Updated 19 August, 2020

Update 19 August, 2020 

It was reported, recently, that Blair put on all his papers of the Iraq War under the Official Secret Act for 70 years. To make sure the truth wont be known till such time.

Update 18 Sept., 2017 -- Recently it emerged that the full report was not published and MPs urging to publish the second part hoping it will more details and name Tony Blair.

Update:  After lots of pressure the Chilcot report was publish. Although very thorough but it did not name Tony Blair which would have brought him into The Hague Criminal Court.

Why again that cover-up? He brought UK into an illegal war which cost over one million lives and Iraq is worse off than ever.

UPDATE: It has now been confirmed that the publication of the Chilcot report will be on 6 July, 2016

Another failed promise -- Cameron promised to publish the papers before the 2015 General Election.  Now being elected the big silence has come down on it again. Who is he protecting? Blair or somebody else? As so many other inquiries it also ended up as a "white wash" costing taxpayers £7.5million which would have done the general public an awful lot of good if spend on them.

The result of this lengthy inquiry is that secret papers between Tony Blair and George Bush

 running up to the invasion in 2003 will not be published. They will only publish papers which had been already edited, in other words the important parts being blackened out. The announcement received heavy criticism. Even Sir John Major, ex-Prime Minister, advised Tony Blair it would be better if he allowed his papers to be published. He pointed out that a refusal would only raise suspicion and it will fester on it.

Labour MP John McDonnell said the deal meant Tony Blair had got his way. He said: "This confirms all the suspicions that people had that this inquiry will be a whitewash."

Former Labour MP Andrew MacKinlay described the inquiry as a "sham". Mr Mackinley, a member of the Commons foreign affairs committee at the time of the war, said: "I am not surprised that Chilcot has surrendered, It is a bad, bad day for democracy and justice, We were lied to as a country time and time again on Iraq, The lies endure."

It has to be pointed out at this point that a man died because being a highly qualified weapon inspector, Dr Kelly.  Tony Blair gave his name to the press and revealed that he is trying to find out whether there are Weapon of Mass Destruction.. Up to this day it had not been established why and by whom Dr Kelly died? The official verdict was suicide but many evidences speak against it. Was he going to spill the truth about the Weapon of Mass Destruction? It would have exposed George Bush and Tony Blair. It would also have stopped their plans to invade Iraq.

Years later, Dr Kelly's body was exhumed and cremated without the permission from his wife and family. It is certainly odd that somebody would have ordered this and without 

permission. It must have been to destroy all evidences of his death.

The Iraq war cost 179 UK soldiers lives. The Chilcot inquiry is also an insult to the families of those soldiers. They want and deserve to know the truth but as one mother Rose Gentle said: "I felt that Tony Blair was being allowed to walk away from the Iraq war. We don't think we'll get the truth now."

Labour MP Paul Flynn said: "The whole truth about the Iraq was required to give closure to the loved ones of the 179 soldiers killed.  The Chilcot Report will publish the truth, some of the truth but not the whole truth"

The inquiry was launched in 2009 and finished in 2011 and it took all this time and many demands to release the Chilcot Report.

One of the main supporter to keep these documents secret is Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood.  He was Mr Blair's principle private secretary and the PM's closest advisers in 1999.  Well that tells it all.

BLAIR COSTS STILL £435,000 A YEAR -- Update 10 March, 2015

TONY BLAIR

UPDATE: 10 March, 2015 --  by now Tony Blair is getting so bad in grabbing money that he is called the "human cashmachine".  It must be so outstanding than all the others are not that backward either with cashing in huge sums of money. According to the report his wife had not be living with him for many years and cashing in wherever she can amounting a fortune of her own. None them would spend some money on the starving. They forget where they come from. 

UPDATE:  9 April 2014 -- FT assumes that Tony Blair is now  worth £100million. Friends of his stated that it is underestimated. He will be in the next Rich List.  Does he have to grab the £435,000 on top of it? A lot of starving families could be helped with that money and he would not even miss it.  Besides he was sacked. Any worker who gets the sack does not get a penny. Why does he still get £435,000 as an ex-Prime Minister?

Now that is where AUSTERITY should begin. Tony Blair has an estimated and I point out estimated fortune accumulated of £30million.

It was incredible news and the taxpayers’ groups were furious and only rightly so. Treasury documents prove that he is still earning a salary of £70,000 called pension a year. In addition he has a £115,000 allowance for his so-called “public Duties”.  Makes you wonder what they must be. On account of post he cost the country at least a £200,000 for security a year.

This is an astonishing news that ex-prime minister travelling all over the world on taxpayers’ money are still receiving a pension of £70,000. From a start, Tony Blair is only now 59 years old and is already getting a pension while the government trying their hardest to get everybody keep on working almost till 70 even if there any jobs about for young people but this is beside the point in this article. The point to make is that Tony Blair gets a pension at 59 and not just a few thousand but £70,000 plus a personal allowance of £115,000. It is all these mismanagement being pointed out in various articles where austerity should be made.

Apparently, under the Parliamentary and Other Pensions Act 1972 former premiers are entitled to a pension based on one half of salary. Well, again Parliament is looking after its own.

Furthermore, it was revealed that according to the Tony Blair’s’ last salary which was £128,000 he would receive a pension of £64,000 but now comes the best bit. The amount was increased to £70,000 to account for inflation over the past five years. Now we look even closer to this appalling pay-out. He received his “Pension” since 2007 when he was only 54 years old. He receives an INCREASE because of the inflation while the taxpayers have their minimum wages reduced and have to work over 65 to receive any pension at all. If that is not a scandal which screams to high heaven, nothing is.  Not to mention again the he has accumulated at £30million while in office.

Pay respect where respect is due. Mr Brown refused his traditional ex-PM’s perk because in his opinion was too generous.

Of course, none of the Prime Minster ever in office will abolish it because they would lose out. It’s all right if the money is there but at the moment Britain is in great trouble and has a mountain of debt.

Thank you Mr Blair for starting two illegal wars which never benefited anyone but cost the country an enormous amount of money and most of all lives. Also Dr Kelly, one of England top weapon expert died under still not disclosed circumstances just before the Iraq started.  The country is still in turmoil and people get killed. Yet for all that Mr Blair receives a “Pension” from the age of 54 being a millionaire himself. Politics really moves in mysterious ways. Plus a job of a Middle East Peace Convey  which  is the biggest joke of them all and a high salary no doubt.

There is even another point to be mentioned. If Mr Blair receives this pension in accordance with the Parliamentary and Other Pensions Act of 1972 than all the other ex-PMs must be getting the same amount which adds up to over a billion of pound. This is terrible wrong especially at the time of great economical crises and they also speak of cutting the disability, benefits for pensioners,cut minimum wages and cutting jobs by the thousands. 

APPARENTLY THERE IS NO AUSTERITY WITH MPS OR EX-PMS. THIS REVELATION IS REALLY HARD TO BEAR AND TO STOMACH. ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY WANT TO CUT DISABILITY BENEFITS AND TAKE ALL THE BENEFITS AWAY FROM PENSIONERS WHICH HARDLY HAVE ENOUGH TO LIVE ON AS IT IS.

News was disclosed that the MPs spent £230,000 of taxpayer’s money (of course), last year on art in decorating their offices in Westminster. On painting costing £12,000 shows the former Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett. 

Margaret Thatcher, ex-PM, claims £500,000 expenses and yet she does not attend any meetings or functions because she has dementia. Isn't that a case of fraud if you claim for something you didn't use?  The government closes their eyes to all this and cuts the little benefits pensioners have such as fuel allowance, free bus passes and pension credit.

It looks like a Robin Hood in reverse. Take from the poorest and give it to the rich because they even had their tax reduced at the time when the British economy is in great trouble..

HILLSBOROUGH DISASTER -- Update 26 April, 2016

HILLSBOROUGH
DISASTER MEMORIA
MAY THEY REST IN PEACE

UPDATE: 26 Aril, 2016
BBC just announced that the jury decided the match commander Ch Supt David Duckerfield's actions amounted to "gross negligence" due to a breach of his duty of care to fans.

Police errors also added to dangerous situation at the FA Cup semi-final.

The behaviour of the fans did not contribute to the dangerous unfolding at the turnstiles.

At long last justice is done 

UPDATE:
15 April, 2016
Yesterday Liverpool beaten Borussia Dortmund in a very dramatic game with 4-3. It started with two goals by Dortmund and Liverpool fought its ways back and gone through to the semi-and final.

The Jury of the longest inquest into the Hillsborough disaster went out on 6 April, 2016 to find a verdict.

Today will be a memorial service at Liverpool's Club for the 96 people lost their lives. At 15.06 the exact time when the Semi-Final was stopped will be a two minutes silence and then the Cathedral will ring out the bells 96 times.

This service was held every year since 1989 but it was now decided it will be the last one since the finish of the inquest starting in 2014 will put a final verdict on the tragedy. But they will never be forgotten.

UPDATED:  17 June,2015  --
A father describes. today, at the inquest, how he tried to rescue his two daughters then he had to make the hard breaking decision whom to be with in their dying moment. It must have haunt him all these years and the governments tried to cover-up; not admitted they refused to open the gates. Even after it resulted into 96 fans' death they called them hooligans and drunkard. It was nothing but lies and smear to cover to cover it up.

UPDATED:  4 August, 2014 -- The current inquest revealed that camera operator Trevor Bichard included in his log the possible "lifesaving" police request to shut the gates to the Lepping Lane terrace at Hillsborough before the disaster. This fact was previously wiped out.  Mr Bichard at first lost his log but found it later. In spite of it he still kept it from the Lord Taylor's statement.

Barristers representing the families of the 96 victims accused Mr Bichard that he lied under orders. He denied the accusation.

The inquest continues and when we receive any new news we will bring it.

UPDATE: 3 April 2014 ---  After all these years the families of the victims managed to break through and got 22 people with allegedly criminal activities.  It took the families 25 years to achieve this.  What must they have gone through; after they lost their love ones and have to bear the grief. 

ON THE 12 April 2014 Liverpool will hold a special seven minutes silence to commemorate the 96 people who had lost their lives in such a tragic and unnecessary way.  It is still unbelievable. 

UPDATE:  23 September 2013 -- New evidence emerged that documents were falsified and statement were forged the most unfortunate announcement was made that Hillsborough fund is running out of donations. This will hamper or even stop the search for the truth and get the police officers into court for alleged cover-up. Of course, they acted under order of the government Margaret Thatcher. May she not rest in peace for what she done to this country and the British people.


UPDATE 9 September, 2012 -- On Wednesday the Government will release the papers kept secret about the disaster. Hopefully it will give the full truth families of the victims are so anguishes waiting for. In the meantime, it revealed, that ambulances were looked out by police which is a very grave and wrong action taken. It was also hoped and demanded that the Prime Minister David Cameron will apologise to the families. It is believed that many of the 96 victims could have been save if given straight away medical treatment. This fact must be terrible to live knowing their son or daughter died due to negligence.

Why is the Hillsborough disaster still a secret? What had the government to hide? At that time it was the Conservative Party led by Margaret Thatcher. However, alternative governments did not disclose the truth either.

We hear so much about democracy not existing in other countries and the West, including the USA, trying to introduce it by backing the ‘freedom fighters’ or ‘rebels’ yet does it exists here? We do have more freedom than some dictatorships but democracy seems sometimes not fully applied.

There are so many incidences where disaster or death struck but the facts were never really fully given. For instance the death of Princess Diana and Dodi in the ‘accident’ in Paris. There are too many unanswered questions to accept it was only an accident.

Another one was Dr Kelly a weapon expert. He died supposedly having cut his own wrist but experts stated that there was too little blood on the ground for him to die of.  This happen at the time of the build-up to a war in Iraq instigated by George Bush and Tony Blaire was roped in. Bush and Blair sworn that Saddam Hussein had weapon of mass destruction. Yet none of them were ever found. Bush and Blair ever stated that they were wrong and apologised. Too many people died and still dying by car bombs.  The West created yet more hatred towards them.

Then there were a number of men working for the MI6 and died under unusual circumstances. Mostly exclaimed with there were women  clothes found in their places in other words they were perverts. The last one was found in a travelling bag, zipped-up and cleverly put into the bath tub. He was very discomposed and fluid was prevented going through the floor with that action. Even expert tried many time to double up and get into the travel bag but couldn’t. Yet, all these death are swept under the floor, hopefully to be forgotten. Yet the families deserve a full explanation.

In 1989 there was an FA foot match in Sheffield. Fire broke out under the stands. In those days there were high metal fences around the pitches because of football hooliganism and pitch invasion. Apparently the gates were also looked and with panic 96 Liverpool fans lost their lives. Up till now the families were not told the full facts of this terrible incident.  The families had to organise a group ‘Justice for the 96 Hillsborough’ to put on pressure. After all these years of battle and heartbreak they were promised to disclose the papers first to the families and then to the public. It supposed happen on 12 September.  Why not there and then? Are they first going through and accumulate which paper to disclose? It looks like that. What have they got to hide?  Even if they done wrong they should have the courage to stand up and disclose it.

THIS WOULD BE A REAL DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.