ISIS PLANS TO ATTACK THE UK NEXT

That was to be expected and by every one but the Government. After all the vote for air strikes was made on nothing but lies. PM David Cameron was bullying the MPs with saying to make the UK safer was a lie and a vote catcher.

Well, let's hear the comment from David Cameron now he ridden the UK into that situation. Congratulation and a thank you to all MPs voting for air-strikes especially to those 66 Labour MPs who back-stabbed Mr Corbyn. Hope you are proud of it.

The very day, before the vote, ISIS put out a video with threats and promises to attack the USA, Russia and France. Nothing was mentioned about the UK. It should have given David Cameron a message not to go through with the vote.

It has also now been revealed his great fanfare of 70,000 ‘moderate rebels’ on the ground do not exists as such. Another lie. David Cameron was warned not to use it by two Army Chiefs because it does not exists.
===========================================================PLEASE, PLEASE BE SO KIND ND CLICK ON ADVERTS. THANK YOU
===========================================================

David Cameron’s vote of a majority was also condemned by the Syria’s Minister of Information. He stated that bombing would not achieve any result it would have been better to co-operate with the Syria’s and Russians’ government.

Mr Cruikshank, an anti-terrorist expert, has information from a reliable source that ISIS is attacking the UK next. Does David Cameron not realise that these people do not fight in the conventional way with soldiers on the ground and air strikes?

They have individuals who go out and shoot and bomb and blow themselves up to commit mass murder. People who might have lived in the UK for some time and are only too ready for their cause.

The UK had already the revenge from the Iraq war when they killed 54 people on 7/7 and injured many more, some with lifelong injuries. Yes, Ken Livingstone was right that it was due to Tony Blair’s started an illegal war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

This time the UN, which is anything but independent, has agreed to it but in my view the UN had no right to. It is not their country. How would the UK or the Government feel if the UN now agreed for the Syrians to start bombing? David Cameron and his glorious Government are so self righteous that they do not see or accept all this.

Entering another country for no matter what reason and start bombing is wrong and always will have some consequences.

Furthermore, it was discovered by the Kurdish army re-capturing the town Sinrac, Iraq that the ISIS built 70 tunnels underground with various chambers and arsenal to protect them from bombing. The tunnels were built by captured people from nearby towns. It does not make Mr Cameron and his disciples look very clever, does it?

THATCHERITE TONY BLAIR STAY AWAY FROM LABOUR -- Update: 28 Nov., 2016

HE EVEN WROTE A BOOK 
ABOUT HIS 
'GLORIOUS' CAREER 
AND CASHED IN ON IT

UPDATE 28 Nov., 2016 --
He even had the nerve to give speeches in the USA charging £100,000 each. Now, after the Chilcot report was published the demand for his speeches seemed to have tried up.

Tony Blair, belief or not, wants to come back into politics. As a MP he would receive £74,000 pa all expenses paid. Does he ever get enough?

UPDATE: 7 July, 2016 --
The Chilcot report is published today and is no white-wash. Although it does not actually name Tony Blair because then he could have got into court but the report states that it was illegal.

Tony Blair  had many warnings that there are no WMD but he also had reports twisting the truth.

Blair did not check them out and went ahead. He did not consult the Privy Council, MPs or people and sent the troops very ill equipped into Iraq. It caused many more deaths than necessary.

Now, Tony Blair said sorry and at the same time "He would do it again".  It is contracting his "Sorry", twisted the knife in the heart of families who lost their sons and the remark was totally unnecessary because he will not get the chance again.

If he is not at the International Crime Court at The Hague he should certainly be banned from politics and any public speaking.

First pretending to be Labour but he is really a Thatcherite. Second to invade Iraq and Afghanistan illegally and still insists he would do it again. At the back of death and destruction he accumulate a wealth of £100million. He is not worth knowing.

UPDATED:  30 August, 2015 -

After a track record of started two illegal wars Tony Blair had the thick never to say: "That Labour has to come to its senses." According to his statement Jeremy Corbyn is dreaming of a "Alice in Wonderland." 


Tony Blair should not and has no right to open his mouth  and pass criticism.

UPDATE: 6 March, 2015 -- Tony Blair gave each of the 106 MPs a £1,000 to fight to win the General Election.  They should give it back because it is nothing but blood on it and he is a Thatcherite in other words two faced. It would not be a surprised if he spies for the Tories.  Personally I would not trust him as far as I can throw him. Due to his two illegal wars the people are under threat in the UK as they never have been before, by terrorism.

Tony Blair should stay away from Labour and especially from its campaign.  The moment the General Election campaign started Tony Blair seems to be popping up in the pictures.  W H Y?  Has he not done enough damage to Labour? In the meantime he dropped his mask and by now it is well known that he is a Thatcherite  Therefore he can only do more harm to Labour or is that his indention to help his Tories?  He is definitely no Labour man and everybody knows it.

From a start to bring the country into the Afghanistan and Iraq war with a lie is not the way Labour is known for.  He caused hundred of thousand of death and maiming. Has he still not the conscience to stay well out of sight and politics? Now we have the aftermath that Britain is on the blacklist of the IS and any moment there could be atrocity on the streets of Britain thanks to Tony Blair and David Cameron. The £10million Iraq Inquiry the papers have not be made public after six years and amongst the people who prevented it was Tony Blair's name. The £10million was again paid by the taxpayers. Furthermore, since the public paid for it it the result should be given to them. It is their property.

Today, the Government pays £20million compensation. This is not a criticism on Iraqi people receiving compensation; it is a criticism of the Government paying it with taxpayers' money instead of Tony Blair. It is estimated that Tony Blair has a wealth of around £100million. He denies it, of course, but even his friends stated that it is an underestimation. Whatever wealth he possess he should pay the £20million compensation because he started the war on a lie.

After he was moved out of Labour he still receives £465,000 a pension for his lies and deceits. He aught to be ashamed to take it especially when he straight away got a post as a Middle-East Peace Envoy which is a joke after declaring war on Afghanistan and Iraq. What is the UN thinking of?

Apparently he has built up his own  business empire in the meantime by holding talks, advising business deals, properties and so on which by now amounts to £57million. Is he also at Labour HQ on an advisory job? It would not be surprising?

Whatever he is up to it would be advisable that Ed Miliband dissociates himself from Tony Blair and his double dealings and sly manners. In my opinion he might even be there to find out and inform his Tory friends.

UK GOVERNMENT DEMAND CUT PENSIONERS' BENEFITS in 2012

Tory MP Nick Boles is a close friend of David Cameron and aught to be deeply ashamed of himself. Does ‘Shame’ exist in the Conservative party dictionary?  Definitely not.

In a speech held at the Resolution Foundation in London Mr Boles demanded to cut all benefits of Old Age Pensioners. Another one of the Conservative Party who show its real face and forgotten that especially this generation of OAP saved this country from invasion of Hitler and his Nazis. Their men fought bitterly with everything they got and even had not the Nazi Army. At home their families scrimped and scraped under most difficult circumstances. Now these glory boys swimming in tenths of million and haven’t got any idea what life is about want to cut the few privileges this generation receives.

Mr Boles suggested cutting the free bus passes which is only used during day time in other words when the seats are empty any way.

He wants to cut winter fuel payment which the Labour Party introduced to prevent OAP dying of hypothermia. If this is taken away those old people will die again as it happen before. Does Mr Boles have any conscience and his friend Mr Cameron including the Conservative Party?

Furthermore, he wants to stop free TV licence. The TV licence came into force because the BBC did not run any adverts but in the meantime they do have adverts and therefore the TV licence fees should be abolished. ITV does not charge any TV licence fees because they had adverts from a start.  So why the BBC is still allowed to carry on with the TV licence fees? Mr Cameron and his friends do not think and talk about this.

Mr Boles also demand to cut the free eye tests. Since the OAP are hard up as it is they cannot pay for eye tests and therefore bad eye sight will endanger their lives.

The whole plan and idea of Mr Boles is an absolute disgrace.

The Conservative Party, as always when they are elected, shows now their true face. Surely there isn’t one pledge from their election manifesto kept.

The moment they came into power there were cuts in Army, RAF, Navy, Nursing staff and lately 6,000 policemen in a crime ridden country already.

The NHS was already understaffed and they cut further nursing post. It is now so bad that doctors and nurses were forced to strike which didn't happen for 40 years and it proves that they don't have any other alternatives. 

Just as long as their books look right in 10 Downing Street.

Army, RAF and Navy again were already undermanned and lacked of equipments yet they had to fight in Iraq, Afghanistan and were sent into Libya. When they came back they came back they were sacked. Any of these countries had nothing to do with Britain and it caused nothing but hatred and terrorism against Britain while the ‘leaders’ of the government sat back in their cushy armchairs.

The most incredible point of it all is that with all these cuts they had a double-dip recession. But instead of sitting down and looking at the result and realizing it doesn’t work they still plough on.

Mr Boles also demands a £10billion general benefit cuts which again hits the worst off people..  

                         

This is really spiteful but it was the Conservative party previously when they closed all the coal mines, shipyards and privatised every government run industry. The result five million unemployed and all these privatised industries don’t work because their shareholders want the most profit.

How could anyone belief the Conservative Party have changed?

BRITAIN AXED MILITARY FORCES -- Update 26 Feb., 2015

UPDATE: 26 February, 2015 -- What kind of politic is that? The Government is spending over £30million  on adverts to recruit soldiers, RAF and Navy personnel. These recruits need training which cost additional money while the previously sacked army were fully trained.  This is sheer loony. The axed personnel are most probably still on benefit which is another waste of money.


UPDATE: 1 March 2014 -- In spite of all the redundancy the Government is still planning to axe 1,400 soldiers. Adding to the previous redundancies in the last three years it is adding a great number of unemployed people.  People who have been trained just for a particular job and have no other knowledge will find it hard to get a job especially in a situation of 2.5million unemployment. Yet, the Government make us belief in reducing unemployment.

UPDATE:  25 January 2013  ---  A further redundancy in the Armed Forces had been announced. There will be another 5,300 soldiers lose their job. This will bring down the total to 82,000 and is the lowest for 200 years. Where does the government think they find jobs in a high unemployed market? Most of them will end up as unemployed and receiving benefit. Then the government is surprised when the benefit payments double and treble. What kind of policy is this/

This is now the second time and in a very short time where armed forces being axed. This time about 4,000 personnel of soldiers and officers had lost their job. Quite a number were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan which was an illegal war started by Mr Bush and involved Mr Blair. It all cost too many lives and didn’t bring peace.

This time it is the RAF and Navy which are mostly losing their men. On the list are six RAF air vice-marshals and 30 group captains.

Overall the RAF are earmarked for 115 squadron leaders

The NAVY will not fare any better with being on the list for five commodore and 15 captains and all together 30,000 Royal Naval personnel.

It was also announced the 500 private and 400 Ghurkhas will receive their redundancy notice. It will especially hit hard the Ghurkhas who fought so willingly and known as the best force in the British Army. They are not allowed to receive British Citizenship and therefore most probably no financial benefits.  This is a disgrace if ever there was one.

In stage three it is the Army which will lose about 20,000 soldiers right across.

There are several points to said about this irresponsibility

The first point which comes to mind is that there is always money available to bail-out countries as well as foreign aids which do nothing but go into the pocket of the various governments.

The second point is the impact of human and military of these job losses. Again most of them fall on social benefit which costs money and does not produce anything.

The third point is that it will reduce Britain to a very low military power. Especially at a moment when there is still Afghanistan fighting going on. The Falklands in danger of being claimed by Argentine, Iraq, Egypt, Libya and Syria are an increasing threat to peace, trade and economy. Hard negotiation over all these dangerous developments will not work if these countries are aware the military force is not there.

The argument by the Coalition that part-time reserve would fill the gap if it comes to the worst is nothing but ludicrous.

A Ministry of Defence spokesman pointed out that the multi-billion deficit has to be reduced.  The plan is to reduce the Army by 82,000 by 2020, Navy and RAF by 5,000

Many of the overworked British Armed Forces applied for redundancy. Their fear of a future in an Armed Force having to work twice is hard of which they are already pushed to total exhaustion being under-staffed already.

On an overall view of the not very clever politics of the present government there are 15,000 policemen lost their job at a time of a crime wave never seen before.

The Olympics is coming up very shortly and the government counter argument to this was that the army would be deployed. On 12 June 2012 -- 4,000 Army personnel and 30,000 Royal Navy personnel lost their job. The Army is still fully deployed in Afghanistan and can’t put down their arms to go back to secure the Olympics safety.

Well let’s hope they know what they doing in practice and not just with statistics and on paper.

The last point is to make that the Ministry of Defence “found” £12billion. What happen to it? This £12billion was sitting there when everything was being paid. Therefore, is the ministry of Defence really in such a high deficit?