USA DEMANDS ARREST ASSAD update 19 Oct., 2017

and now the USA wants to ride the UK into another war with North Korea - not only a war but a nuclear war and May is willing to do so!!!!!! So far NK only threatened USA and not UK. Why get involved? It was of USA backing during Afghanistan and Iraq the UK experiencing terrorism. Why not demand to arrest Bush? His and Blair's illegal actions cost at least one million lives. Now again USA enter Syria illegal costing untold number of lives and driven people from their homes. when does USA stop playing the world power???? 

Apparently, they have not learned from their two illegal invasion Afghanistan and Iraq and lies of WMD

Shocking evidence of USA's aggression but constantly pointing at Russia and other countries.

Why does Rex Tillerson not demand and persuade the USA Government to end the war in Syria. If they pull out the rest would and Assad's army is capable to destroy IS and the rebels.

Of all the thick nerves in history the USA has the thickest.

They demand Russia to distance themselves from Syria’s President Assad. They call Mr Assad a war criminal and want him to be arrested and taken to the International court in The Hague to be tried.

This message was taken directly to Russia’ President Vladimir Putin by US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.

Has the USA forgotten that their ex-President George Bush could also be a war criminal and should be tried at The Hague? He created two illegal wars at Afghanistan and Iraq where over one million people died.

USA started to bomb Syria with the excuse to wipe out the IS but not the 'moderate rebels' who are on the USA's side. Are they really on their side or they just after support and weapons which might be handed over to the IS? USA started a civil war six years ago and Russia only came in three years ago to support Mr Assad. So who is the aggressor? USA got their back up because Russia bombed rebels as well as IS.

We had the same situation before when a chemical bomb was dropped in Syria. Ex-US Secretary of State John Kerry never stopped shooting his mouth off that it was Assad’s army. He also kept insisting that 1,400 people died while Doctors Without Borders who were there stated it was around 500 people who died. Who could you believe more?

UN sent top experts there to investigate the evidence. The report was never published. Now the point is if it were Assad’s army the USA would have demanded for the report to be published.

PM May is none-the-wiser when she congratulated Donald Trump on his missiles mission of 59 Tomahawk being fired into Syria. One was reported to have been misfired and went into a village.

UK Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson cancelled a meeting with Russia Foreign Secretary Sergei Lavrov. It was very undiplomatic. Mr Lavrov saved the world from a war the last time. Mr Kerry was pushing so hard to start an offensive and everybody held its breath. Mr Lavrov suggested, in the last minute, for Mr Assad to hand over all his chemical weapons to Russia to be destroyed. Mr Assad agreed and the world was saved.

Mr Johnson also demanded further sanctions on Russian but was out-voted. These two incidents did nothing for the UK, PM May and Mr Johnson to look good or Donald Trump. They should have waited until the facts were established and then voice their opinion and demands.

A theory goes around that IS had chemical weapons of which nobody knew anything about it and in a bombing raid it hit the depot. It sounds plausible.

The problem is that USA is hell bend to get Mr Assad out at all cost. The chemical bomb was just a good reason for them to put oil into the fire again.  However, it would be wise if the USA would wait till the UN top inspectors are investigate the evidence and establish the facts.

Another point is that the USA labels anyone as a dictator right through the Middle East when USA decides to invade. So far, they stayed clear of Saudi Arabia, Iran and Israel. Apparently in USA’s opinion they are not dictators which makes you wonder.

Especially Israel which systematically kill, imprison people and very young children mostly young boys, in the middle of the night and confiscate the Palestinian’s land. USA and UK do not raise one objection no matter what they do to these people.

Yet, Israel should be the most peaceful country after what they went through with the Holocaust. Why are they doing the same to the Palestinians?

ISIS PLANS TO ATTACK THE UK NEXT

That was to be expected and by every one but the Government. After all the vote for air strikes was made on nothing but lies. PM David Cameron was bullying the MPs with saying to make the UK safer was a lie and a vote catcher.

Well, let's hear the comment from David Cameron now he ridden the UK into that situation. Congratulation and a thank you to all MPs voting for air-strikes especially to those 66 Labour MPs who back-stabbed Mr Corbyn. Hope you are proud of it.

The very day, before the vote, ISIS put out a video with threats and promises to attack the USA, Russia and France. Nothing was mentioned about the UK. It should have given David Cameron a message not to go through with the vote.

It has also now been revealed his great fanfare of 70,000 ‘moderate rebels’ on the ground do not exists as such. Another lie. David Cameron was warned not to use it by two Army Chiefs because it does not exists.
===========================================================PLEASE, PLEASE BE SO KIND ND CLICK ON ADVERTS. THANK YOU
===========================================================

David Cameron’s vote of a majority was also condemned by the Syria’s Minister of Information. He stated that bombing would not achieve any result it would have been better to co-operate with the Syria’s and Russians’ government.

Mr Cruikshank, an anti-terrorist expert, has information from a reliable source that ISIS is attacking the UK next. Does David Cameron not realise that these people do not fight in the conventional way with soldiers on the ground and air strikes?

They have individuals who go out and shoot and bomb and blow themselves up to commit mass murder. People who might have lived in the UK for some time and are only too ready for their cause.

The UK had already the revenge from the Iraq war when they killed 54 people on 7/7 and injured many more, some with lifelong injuries. Yes, Ken Livingstone was right that it was due to Tony Blair’s started an illegal war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

This time the UN, which is anything but independent, has agreed to it but in my view the UN had no right to. It is not their country. How would the UK or the Government feel if the UN now agreed for the Syrians to start bombing? David Cameron and his glorious Government are so self righteous that they do not see or accept all this.

Entering another country for no matter what reason and start bombing is wrong and always will have some consequences.

Furthermore, it was discovered by the Kurdish army re-capturing the town Sinrac, Iraq that the ISIS built 70 tunnels underground with various chambers and arsenal to protect them from bombing. The tunnels were built by captured people from nearby towns. It does not make Mr Cameron and his disciples look very clever, does it?

UK TORY GOVERNMENT VOTED FOR AIR STRIKES

Cameron's biggest mistake comes home to haunt him and especially us. ISIS declares UK next for attack.

It is still unbelievable and surely for the majority of the people. Prime Minister David Cameron forced the Tory MPs to vote for air strikes.

Not so much persuaded by Mr Cameron but he insisted on a "collective" vote which means the MPs have to vote "Yes" on Mr Cameron's decision. 

Labour leader Mr Corbyn decided on a free vote for his MPs. Therefore you found 66 Labour MPs voted for air strikes while Mr Corbyn was against it. It gave the Government the majority.
.

Well America has roped the UK in again, into a war which nobody wanted.

Mr Assad, President of Syria, has stated on the Czech TV that the USA’s bombing did not make much an impact and it is the fact because the ISIS made constant progress. Therefore, the question is what were the USA doing all those four years? Mr Assad also pointed out that the Russian, in their short time of being involved, made a bigger impact.
===========================================================
PLEASE, PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS. THANK YOU
===========================================================

MPs were never more misled and dealt against the will of the people who elected them. If the Tories would have given the MPs a free vote like Labour did, it would have been a different outcome and the David Cameron and his disciples knew it. It was nothing but a calculation of manipulation.

Two days after your voting for bombing the ISIS announced to attack the UK first. Well done MPs; hope you are proud of it. One day before the vote the ISIS only named the USA, Russia and France as their next target. No UK was mentioned. 

He was so desperate to get involved that he had the RAF already stood by and gave them the go ahead within an hour.

Every mission costs the country £500million which, of course, he did not mention it in his speech. Every missile cost £22,000 for Paveway 4 to target armoured personnel carrier, £100,000 for Brimstone to target fast moving pick-up trucks and individual IS fighters and £790,000 for Storm Shadow cruise missiles to take out bigger targets.

Since the beginning of the civil war which the American ignited by supporting al-Qaeda from which the ISIS sprang and the so called “moderate rebels” the civilian died or fled. Also the UK was supporting the 'rebels' later on.

Now that the ISIS being totally ruthless and gone out of hand the West shouting about to destroy them. There again about 11 countries, in the last few months, are bombarding them already which should have been a total wipe out by now.

However, so far 300,000 people died and millions are displaced and the ISIS is still causing atrocities. It does not give a successful picture.

Russia even so they fly bombing mission, now suggests a more peaceful way of bringing the ISIS down. They suggest sanction and confiscating their bank account as far as possible. French President Hollande who faced the biggest attack so far also agreed with the Russians.

Why could David Cameron not join them instead of hot-heading into air strikes which do not eliminated the danger of being attacked on the street in the UK but increase it. David Cameron placed now the country and its people into the most dangerous situation, whether he likes to admit it or not.

The other point is how he dares to spend such vast amount of money while only in his recent budget demanded a £12billion Welfare cut. A Welfare cut from the cash strapped people who are already starving and many homeless because they cannot pay their bills.

Can anybody he be so callous with Ian Duncan Smith, head of DWP, hopping about at the announcement of £12billion Welfare cuts and then all his disciples agreed to spend billions of pounds on air strikes which nobody wants

Make no mistake, even so the House of Lords voted against the £12billion Welfare cuts, but Chancellor George Osborne will wangle it through. He also cut the councils by £16billion which will reduce their service drastically.

Again the Tories put out the lie that the debts occurred during Labour government but £500billion was added on since 2010 and now every month them adding £50 to £60million every month since they won the election.

So far Chancellor George Osborne borrowed already the same amount as for the whole financial last year and there is still five months to go.

In view of the economical disaster how can the government no disregards and enters the UK into a war.  A war which David Cameron now discloses it would last for years. So were does the money come from for this war?

Afghanistan and Iraq should have been more than a lesson. It achieved nothing but disarray in the countries, death and financial hardship on both sides.

This Prime Minister seems too bent over just to get his will despite of all cost. He let happily the Steel Industry go and kowtow to the Chinese who rub their hands with glee because they are flooding the UK with cheaper steel. He signed a contract for two Nuclear Power Stations to be built by the French EDF and run by Chinese. He brought the general public down to starvation with austerity. He is controlling the press and wants now to control the Freedom of Information. He is pushing through a new law to stop strikes. He took the power off the council to disagree with fracking. It is now decided by Westminster because Lancashire Council turned his friends down for fracking.

All these actions, and there are more, have certainly nothing to do with democracy and representation of the people who elected them. Hopefully the people will remember this at the local election next year and the power of the Tory’s majority will be take out off their hands.

                                                                  

SYRIA NEEDS PEACE VOTE LABOUR

THERESA MAY

THE NEW PRIME MIMISTER

Syria needs peace and all the Allies should work towards it.

At the moment, it was reported, 11 countries are bombing the ISIS strongholds.  But a great number of these countries play a double game. They are bombing while they supply the ISIS with weapons through the back-door. Therefore the bombing will not achieve anything but destruction of the towns.

Is it wise that UK PM David Cameron trying to push his decision forward to add the UK in the bombing raids?

The leader of the Labour Party, who has become a thorn in David Cameron‘s sides, campaigns to bring peace to Syria and end the civil war. After all it had increased and spilled over the border of Syria across the world.

USA supported the “moderate rebels” which is very debatable group who they are and escalate the fighting with no hope to bring down Mr Assad. US Secretary of State, John Kerry, seems to be too hot headed in his termination of replacing Mr Assad. Therefore, presumable pressuring Mr Cameron and him follows it not very wise. 

The only PM who refused to join the USA was Harold Wilson, Labour, in the Vietnam War. A war, which turned out to be a great loss of lives.

One of the arguments against increased bombing is that it would bring ISIS’ revenge to the UK, like it did in France. Defence Secretary Michael Fallon pointed out that the UK is already on the ISIS list. It maybe so and there is no doubt because of the unauthorised bombing made by David Cameron last September. Unauthorised because the MPs voted against it in 2013.

However, Mr Fallow has a point but more bombing would increase Isis’s determination to repeat a Paris attack in London. If the UK now stays out of it it might be avoidable.

Although the West does not want to listen and hear it but the Russian having a more sensible approach to bring the ISIS down. They suggest sanctions and confiscate the huge amount of money sitting everywhere in banks.  Banks also have to answer why they playing a double game and support the ISIS in a round about way.

France President Mr Hollande had a meeting with the Russian President Mr Puttin and  agreed to side with Russia in a united effort to bring peace.

Although Germany announced that the Cabinet decided to join the bombing raid but a poll showed that only 36 per cent of the people agreed with it.  Mrs Merkel also went against the people’s wishes. This point was not widely spread in the press because it would influence MPs' votes  to some extent..

USA SENT SPECIAL TROOPS TO SYRIA

MR ASSAD

My Opinion:  It is an escalation of the situation which is unnecessary. It looks a counteract to the Russian bombing the ‘rebels’ as well as the IS. The ‘rebels’ are supported by the USA and it’s Allies which already is wrong. The USA has no right to interfere in Syria but they had been operating there since 2011.

America and its Allies are determined to bring Mr Assad, the President, of Syria down. According to them he is a dictator but that was said about Afghanistan’s -, Iraq’s –, Iran’s -, Lebanon’s – and Libya’s leaders and these countries were completely destroyed.

Now it seems Syria is on the list. It is surprising that Saudi Arabia is all for Mr Assad to be brought down because he is a ‘dictator’.  The Saudis do not have an exact perfect track record.

US Secretary of State John Kerry was already pushing in 2014 for military intervention with all his might and the world was on the verge of war. The reason was that a chemical bomb was dropped and John Kerry insisted it was Mr Assad’s regime. He also stated constantly, that 1,500 were killed while the Doctors Without Borders who were there stated it was around 500.

=======================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU
======================================================

For days John Kerry kept on and the UK was ready to sent troops into action. In the last minute the Russians intervened and made Mr Assad to hand over all his chemical weapons which were destroyed. Their action put out the fuse and John Kerry vanished from the TV news.

The UN sent a team of experts to investigate. The report was never published and it all died a natural death. In my view, if it had been Assad's army we would have heard of it in big headlines.Most probably in 50 years we will read about the truth

The moment Russia back-up Mr Assad’s regime by bombing the ‘rebels’ as well as IS strongholds John Kerry was back. He criticised the Russians for bombing but never mind American done it for five years. The main reason was that Russia destroyed ammunition depots and communication centres of the IS as well as the‘rebels’. USA swore revenge.

Russia invited the USA representatives to Moscow to a talk to solve the problems diplomatically. The public was not informed of the outcome or any other details.

Apparently there was not a lot achieved because the USA is now sending troops to Syria without permission of Mr Assad and his government.  This is a violation of entering a country and it is illegal.  It is also an escalation of the civil war.  It proves that America and its allies have no intention of bringing the situation to a peaceful end.

It does not give any credibility to the USA, its allies and John Kerry trying to stop the civil war or solving the refugee crisis.

It is high time that America stops playing the righteous, including UK, and stops interfering in other countries. The USA and UK have enough troubles at home to be solved and both are, at the moment, not exactly democratic.

 The UK government is trying to cut the welfare by £12billion but always has hundreds of billions of pounds for war which does not concern them. Why the UK has to get involved every time the USA snap their fingers? It got  the UK so many enemies. Harold Wilson, Labour, was the only leader who refused to get involved in the Vietnam war.

Why the US Secretary of State John Kerry forever trying to light the fuse is anyone guess? Syria is not Afghanistan, Iraq or any other country. Behind Syria are Russia, China and Iran.  Is John Kerry to bring about another World War?

John Kerry, so the record, was dishonourable dismissed from the Navy during the Vietnam War because he was in contact with the Vietcong.  In America to be dishonourable dismissed from the forces is one of the worst sentences a person can get. Very few employers would employ that person. Yet, there he is a US Secretary of State trying to aggravate the situation to the fullest.                              

TURKISH FIGHTER JETS BOMBED ISIS

On Friday Turkish fighter jets attacked ISIS targets in Syria for the first time.

They also rounded up hundreds of suspects in a coordinated crackdown.

The bombing had been a major move by Turkey which was hesitant for a long time to follow the US-led coalition.

According to the acting Turkish Prime Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, the Turkish F-16 warplane were based in Diyaebarik had attacked three IS targets with guided bombs at dawn on Friday.  It also attacked the group headquarter and assembly point.  Nine ISIS fighters were killed and 12 injured.

Turkey is also willing to led US-led coalition to use its Incirlik airbase and other airbase in the south of the country to enable them to fly strikes against ISIS, according to the foreign minister.

This remarkable change of policy followed an attack on a Turkish soldier who was killed and a suicide bombing which killed 12 people in the southern province of Sunic which is as few miles from Syrian border.

It has not been officially announced when the Inairlit would be available to the US but Turkish media predicted it would August when the first allied attack will be flown from the airbase.

Additional airbases in the nearby cities of Diyarbak and Batman will be open to the planes for emergencies.

A report from the Turkish media that a deal was made including a no-fly zone in the northern Syria, which Turkey demanded for a long time, was denied by the US.

This change of Turkish policies could mean an attack on the Syria leader, Bashar al Assad, which the US and the Syria rebels were hoping for.

That leaves us with the question: “Why is the US so bent over backward to replace any leader in the Middle East? It would be far wiser to join the President Assad’s forces and destroy ISIS from that side. It would mean peace and not spreading the crisis which could easily escalate now.

Why has the US always to have their leader and country under the US control?

PM Davutoglu confirmed on Friday that they detained around 300 people with suspected linked ISIS and the Kurdish Worker Party (PKK) was just the beginning of a wider operation. 

A statement was given that the raids were without distinction against all terrorist groups in 13 provinces.

It read: “The state of the Turkish republic is adamant on fighting all terrorists without distinction as it has always done, be it the terrorist organisation of Daesh (ISIS), the terrorist organisation of the PKK or any other international terrorist organisation.”

Late Friday night, unconfirmed by Turkey, the Turkish media reported that warplanes had attacked PKK camps in Northern Iraq.

Those air strikes come as a deadly warning bringing Turkey into the Syria crisis.

Tension rises not only in Turkey but across the world since also PM David Cameron of the UK gave permission, without the MPs consent, to enter the crisis.  It was discovered that RAF pilots flew bombing raids under the US command.  That action of the Prime Minister brought the UK into the conflict of which the people were and the majority of MPs voted against it but as always it will the people who will get the revenge.

USA SUPPLIED MISSILES TO SYRIA REBBELS -- Update 30 March,2015

UPDATE:  30 March, 2015 --  Did you know John Kerry was dishonourable dismissed from the Navy because he was in conduct with the Viet-Con at a time of the Vietnam war.  In America it is the worst thing to be dishonourable dismissed from the forces and almost impossible to find employment but here he is in a top job, US Secretary of States, lighting all the fuses he can find. 

JOHN KERRY

UPDATE: 19 Sept., 2014  --  A new announcement by President Mr Obama was made that the congress agreed to support the "moderate" rebels in Syria. How does the US know  who is a moderate rebel and who is not? Is it not a double dealing and in  reality to fight Assad?  The US is willing to spend $500million supporting the "moderate" rebels. It is known that the IS was well on the ground already at the beginning of 2013 and cooperating with the Al-Qaeda. To me it looks like fighting the IS on the front and supplying it through the back door.  The same as before in 2013. President Assad is backed by Russia and China. Why aggravate the situation again? Let them sort themselves out.


UPDATE:  11 March 2014  --  A time to remember when we had the Syria crisis  --  will it be the same double dealing now with the Ukraine? John Kerry, Vice President of the USA, was pushing with all his power to ignite the flame in Syria quietly supplying weapon through the back-door and Britain was not far behind. Again he is in and out of the Ukraine and so is Foreign Minister of Britain William Hague who is non-the-better.

Is that a surprise; no, no surprise at all. After all the headlines the politicians gave out times and again. You could see they were itching for a long time to get involved and swore blindly all along they wouldn't. They would only supply advice and no military support. Why the hypocrisy in the first place when most of the public knew they would support Syria’s rebels eventually with weapon and most properly sooner or later with an army.

When will the West ever learn and stay out of other countries’ trouble? Will it have to take another world  war to drive message home more? Times to play the super power are over. It only leads again to more confrontation and money spent which supposed to be none and lives unnecessarily lost.

==================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU
==================================================

The Foreign Secretary William Hague announced a week ago that the UK is giving £5billion on top of the previously contribution but it is for advising the rebels only. Now this again sounds wrong because £5billion do not buy a Stinger missile. Surely the public would have no information at all but instead all these blatant lies.

According to the report CIA spies smuggled about 14 Stinger missiles into Syria. It enables the rebel fighter to defend themselves against air strikes.  These weapons had been smuggled through Turkey. It has also been claimed that Saudi Arabia paid partly for it.

President Bashar al-Assad uses MIG-23 warplanes and helicopter gunships. So far the West and Middle East were not able to establish a non-fly zone to stop Assad’s carnage on the ground.  It had been claimed so far 1,000 people were killed by Assad’s air force.

It is hoped that with supplying Stinger missiles it would give Assad a message to stop the air strikes.

So far during the 17 weeks civil war there were 20,000 people killed and most properly the same number if not more injured with some very badly and maimed for life.

Again we ask ourselves who are these rebel or freedom fighters? Like in Libya the West did not receive a great appreciation when they came into power. Many demands such as deporting the killer PC Fletcher and others who were involved in atrocities. The rebel fighters promised but when in power nothing was said or heard about it. The same as the desecration of the British soldiers graves. That was a nice thank you.

This will be the same scenario and therefore the question remains: “When will the West ever learn?”

Afghanistan soldiers being constantly shot by Afghan police. They don't get killed in combat but being murdered as a thank you.

UPDATE - 23 AUGUST 2012 -  THE LATEST INFORMATION GIVEN OUT BY WASHINGTON THAT THEY ARE THINKING OF SENDING IN TROOPS

With Israel thinking of attacking Iran and the USA already planning to send troops into Syria the world is not only playing with fire but dynamite. Don't they really not see that it could explode into WWIII? Make no mistake it is that serious.

BRITAIN AXED MILITARY FORCES -- Update 26 Feb., 2015

UPDATE: 26 February, 2015 -- What kind of politic is that? The Government is spending over £30million  on adverts to recruit soldiers, RAF and Navy personnel. These recruits need training which cost additional money while the previously sacked army were fully trained.  This is sheer loony. The axed personnel are most probably still on benefit which is another waste of money.


UPDATE: 1 March 2014 -- In spite of all the redundancy the Government is still planning to axe 1,400 soldiers. Adding to the previous redundancies in the last three years it is adding a great number of unemployed people.  People who have been trained just for a particular job and have no other knowledge will find it hard to get a job especially in a situation of 2.5million unemployment. Yet, the Government make us belief in reducing unemployment.

UPDATE:  25 January 2013  ---  A further redundancy in the Armed Forces had been announced. There will be another 5,300 soldiers lose their job. This will bring down the total to 82,000 and is the lowest for 200 years. Where does the government think they find jobs in a high unemployed market? Most of them will end up as unemployed and receiving benefit. Then the government is surprised when the benefit payments double and treble. What kind of policy is this/

This is now the second time and in a very short time where armed forces being axed. This time about 4,000 personnel of soldiers and officers had lost their job. Quite a number were fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan which was an illegal war started by Mr Bush and involved Mr Blair. It all cost too many lives and didn’t bring peace.

This time it is the RAF and Navy which are mostly losing their men. On the list are six RAF air vice-marshals and 30 group captains.

Overall the RAF are earmarked for 115 squadron leaders

The NAVY will not fare any better with being on the list for five commodore and 15 captains and all together 30,000 Royal Naval personnel.

It was also announced the 500 private and 400 Ghurkhas will receive their redundancy notice. It will especially hit hard the Ghurkhas who fought so willingly and known as the best force in the British Army. They are not allowed to receive British Citizenship and therefore most probably no financial benefits.  This is a disgrace if ever there was one.

In stage three it is the Army which will lose about 20,000 soldiers right across.

There are several points to said about this irresponsibility

The first point which comes to mind is that there is always money available to bail-out countries as well as foreign aids which do nothing but go into the pocket of the various governments.

The second point is the impact of human and military of these job losses. Again most of them fall on social benefit which costs money and does not produce anything.

The third point is that it will reduce Britain to a very low military power. Especially at a moment when there is still Afghanistan fighting going on. The Falklands in danger of being claimed by Argentine, Iraq, Egypt, Libya and Syria are an increasing threat to peace, trade and economy. Hard negotiation over all these dangerous developments will not work if these countries are aware the military force is not there.

The argument by the Coalition that part-time reserve would fill the gap if it comes to the worst is nothing but ludicrous.

A Ministry of Defence spokesman pointed out that the multi-billion deficit has to be reduced.  The plan is to reduce the Army by 82,000 by 2020, Navy and RAF by 5,000

Many of the overworked British Armed Forces applied for redundancy. Their fear of a future in an Armed Force having to work twice is hard of which they are already pushed to total exhaustion being under-staffed already.

On an overall view of the not very clever politics of the present government there are 15,000 policemen lost their job at a time of a crime wave never seen before.

The Olympics is coming up very shortly and the government counter argument to this was that the army would be deployed. On 12 June 2012 -- 4,000 Army personnel and 30,000 Royal Navy personnel lost their job. The Army is still fully deployed in Afghanistan and can’t put down their arms to go back to secure the Olympics safety.

Well let’s hope they know what they doing in practice and not just with statistics and on paper.

The last point is to make that the Ministry of Defence “found” £12billion. What happen to it? This £12billion was sitting there when everything was being paid. Therefore, is the ministry of Defence really in such a high deficit?

  

DAVID CAMERON'S POLITICS ?????

IN MAY 2012 and it has not improved

Forgive me for saying so but is there any sense to David Cameron’s politic?

He breaks protocol in backing Mr Sarkozy’s election campaign and ignores Mr. Hollande when he visited London before his election.  When he met the new President of France at the G8 meeting he had a private meeting with him but, of course, with Mr Hollande’s refusing austerity it did not go well. Mr Hollande’s comment was afterwards “we agreed to disagree.”

Then he tells Mrs Merkel to back-up Greece with Germany’s ‘wealth’. First of all Germany’s ‘wealth’ had gone with Euro which David Cameron should be aware off. Secondly, Germany had a 0.5 per cent in the last quarter improvement. However, by now the people of Germany are just as fed-up like in Britain always paying out to other countries while austerity has been applied to them. These countries were standing on their own feet before so why are they constantly bankrupt now?  It is every year they asking for bail-out. Do wake up Leaders.

David Cameron’s famous austerity is only for the ordinary people. His cutting 16,000 police officers with two major celebrations coming up.  He cuts the Army, Navy and RAF drastically. At the moment he is planning to send troops to Syria to stop the bloodshed.  He also told the G8 leaders to increase the pressure and send more troops to increase the 300 troops already there. Do we see an escalation into a war again? Why again?

Now let’s go over to the Ministry of Defence. All this time we were told that they inherited about £38billion of debt from incapable Labour. Last week it was revealed that Defence Secretary Philip Hammond ‘found’ £12billion unspent cash. Is it a small mind that can’t work out when there is a £38billion deficit and then all of sudden £12billion emerged not being spent? Surely it doesn’t add up and £12billion can’t be that small that it vanished between the sheets of accountancy. At the same Mr Hammond insists that the redundancies will still go ahead.  All at the same time when Mr Cameron plans to get the troops ready to go to Syria.

Last week was a further £30billions swiped off the pension’s funds and plunged into a £93billion deficit.  The pension fund should not have put onto the stock exchange. Everybody knows how fickle the stock exchange is, especially at the moment, and furthermore it was the people’s money. The previous Conservative government had no right to do so. If they left it where it was before the pension fund would still be there plus accumulated interests.  That is the reason for running out of pensions and not because there are more people retired or they live longer.

Do we have to have another Einstein to solve all these riddles and confusion?