USA HAS NO RIGHT TO ATTACK OTHER COUNTRIES Update 15 June,2017

High time USA  stops playing the world power under the cover to bring democracy. They have not got it in the USA the way they tread the none-whites. USA destroyed enough countries and lives.

Update 15 June, 2017 --
Since Qatar refused a business deal with the USA they are now labelled as terrorists sympathiser and sanctioned. Has the USA found a new country to attack and destroy forever?

They won't turn on Saudi Arabia because they are too big and powerful and one of the biggest weaponry buyers but are the biggest terrorists sympathisers.

Update 27 Oct., 2016 --

USA destroyed three coastal radar sites in Yemen which makes them involved there. Saudi Arabia has been already bombarding the country for some time with weapon supplied by USA and UK.

Another country to be destroyed for no reason at all to the USA

Since the end of  WWII the USA never stopped attacking other countries.

First under the excuse to stop communism. They attack Vietnam, Korea, Laos, Cambodia and left them completely devastated and in ruins.

None of these countries were aggressive to the USA. Communist Russia under Stalin would not full back these countries knowing it would escalate into another World War. Therefore to call Russia, then and now, aggressive is wrong just to draw the attention from themselves.

Reminder, it was Russia which defused the built up when the chemical bomb was dropped and John Kerry pushing us into another full scale war with all his might. Russia is not perfect but not half as aggressive as always pointed at or the USA.

Yet they supported Pol-Pot, Papa Dog, Baby Dog and Khmer Rouge which were one of the worst killers in history.

Does that make sense?

Recently they attacked Afghanistan and overthrown the government because they were dictators. The same excuse was made to invade Iraq, Lebanon, Libya and now Syria.

They were all illegal wars and yet the UN, supposed to be a peace keeper, never raised an eye brow leave alone stopped it.

If these governments were dictators and kept killing their people what about George Bush and Tony Blair? They have killed in Iraq alone one million civilian. It is doubtful that even Saddam Hussein would have achieved that.

Israel almost wiped Palestinians off the map  but nobody, leave alone the USA, would call them dictators. USA would not invade Israel because it supplies the USA with weapons. Israel produces the most sophisticated weapons in the world.

Since USA and UN are trying to be so righteous why is George Bush and Tony Blair not prosecuted for the illegal war;  killing so many people in Afghanistan and Iraq and thousands of soldiers had to die needlessly?

Britain had a investigation on the Iraq war and Chilcot's report stated openly it was wrong and illegal and proved that Tony Blair sanctioned it. It cost 480 British soldiers lives and one million civilians in Iraq but up till now Tony Blair is allowed to carry with his Empire making billions of ponds. He was never pulled into court in The Hague.

Where is the USA righteousness there and George Bush?

The USA started a war in Syria for the only reason given again that  President  Assad  is a dictator and kills his people. Yet the USA has again killed hundred times more people. Let the Taliban grow in Afghanistan and the IS in Iraq.

Does the USA ever look at its own record or is only interested in getting rid of the weaponry to produce more to keep the dollar flowing?

When IS got completely out of hand and the threat was there to overrun the West loud scream for help started to be heard.

When there was a chemical bomb dropped in Syria and US State Secretary John Kerry never stopped to beat the drums for military intervention, blaming Syria's army. Mr Assad admitted they have chemical weapons but never used it

John Kerry also insisted that 1,500 people died but the "Doctors without Borders" which were there at the time insisted it was 200 or 300.

John Kerry is nothing but a warmonger yet when he was fighting in the Vietnam war he was dishonourable dismissed because he was  in contact with the Vietcong. A dishonourable dismissal from military in America is the worst thing, it means no employment or very low; yet look where John Kerry is.

John Kerry near convincing the West  and it came to a point that world peace was threatened facing a chemical WWIII. Literally in the last minute Russia intervened made  Mr Assad hand over his chemical weapons to the Russians to be destroyed.

The UN sent an envoy of top inspectors out but the report was never published therefore you can make your own conclusion. John Kerry vanished into the back ground.

In the meantime, the Kunduz hospital, run by "Doctors without Borders" with a  big red cross on the roof was bombed. At first the USA tried to justify it that 12 Taliban were hiding inside. Even so a hospital should never been bombed and eventually America admitted the mistake but gave a very lukewarm speech by one of the top brass.

Now, three hospitals were bombed in Syria and first big headlines but eventually it went out of the limelight and nobody asked any more question. 46 Syrian soldiers were killed by mistake!! No question being asked; answer given but eventually the Russians were blamed. 

At the moment is the scandalous bombing of an aid supply convoy heading toward Aleppo hitting three of the trucks. At first the USA was blamed but then it turned into Russia got the blame.

The moment the incident happen John Kerry was there again to point the finger at Russia. Russia never commented and so far it had not been officially established who was at fault.

Will we ever know or will it be kept secret again like the chemical attack?

One thing for sure if it was Russia it would have been all over the newspapers.

It is well known that USA and their Allies bombing and fighting the IS and supplying weaponry through the backdoor to them.

Since Russia got involved they pointing their fingers at them for bombing Aleppo, killing civilians, but nobody in the West or USA blame USA to have started another illegal war killing civilians since 2011.

UK SOLDIER DIED OF WOUNDS FROM AFGHANISTAN CAMERONS ENTERS NEW CONFLICT

A young British Soldier L/CPL Michael Campbell, 32, died, of his wounds received in Afghanistan. May he rest in peace. 

PM David Cameron entered, at the same time,  another conflict by bombing ISIS?  He sent RAF Pilots to the US and led them go on bombing raids under the US command even after the majority of MPs voted in 2013 against it.

The young soldier who died made the 454th UK service personal that lost their lives, may they Rest In Peace.  British soldiers should not die for other causes but should only be there to defend its country.

L/CPL Michael Campbell received all the honour and praise by his commanding officer and comrades which he deserves but at the end of it what a waste of a young life and so the rest of the 453 soldiers.

Afghanistan had nothing to do with the UK yet the UK invaded the country and it cost 454 lives plus untold number of injuries, a great number life changing.  A war which Bush declared and was illegal but Blair had to follow. It is not justifiable that so many people had to die plus untold Afghan civilian.

Again, America supported the Taliban while the Russians were fighting there and the Taliban grew into strength. When the Russian left because they could not win the fight; America turned on the Taliban. At the moment the USA flying drones into Taliban position in Pakistan and again it is illegal because USA is not at war with Pakistan. 

It had been reported that drones are fired irresponsible and civilian get killed or maimed.

America had all the sympathy of the world when the World Centre was destroyed. Why did Bush not build on it? He and Blair started an illegal war in Afghanistan and Iraq which created more enemies than the UK had ever known before. But it is the innocent people who will suffer revenge like the 7/7 and recently Tunisia's shooting.

Also their easy way of life and freedom has gone because of the tight security everywhere.

USA is now getting involved in Syria under the cover of destroying the ISIS. At the same time they supply the “moderate Rebel” with weapon. As if such a thing “moderate rebel” exists. In 2013 the USA supplied the rebels with missiles and the UK with chemical which would enable them to build chemical weapons.

Again the US and UK were supporting the rebels which are nothing but Al Qaeda branching off into IS.  It would be far better if the US and UK would support the Syrian President Bashar al Assad. It would destroy the terrorists and would bring peace.

John Kerry the US Secretary of State asked the Congress for $500billion to supply the “moderate rebels” with weapon. The Congress agreed. America has 50million unemployed who struggle to survive.The same story a in the UK there is always money available for weapons and war.

John Kerry was dishonourable dismissed when he was in the Marines which is the worst thing happened in America. He was in contact with the Vietcon during the Vietnam War.  How on earth did get to be Secretary of State with such a record?

UK has three million unemployed and over one million starving families with 40,000 children living under the poverty line and even introduced now Welfare cuts of £12billlion but spend the money to supporting the “moderate rebels” with weapon. It is pure lunacy.

Apparently peace is not what the US and its allies want. The people want peace but not the leader but the people are in the firing line, one way or another.  

DAVID CAMERON'S POLITICS ?????

IN MAY 2012 and it has not improved

Forgive me for saying so but is there any sense to David Cameron’s politic?

He breaks protocol in backing Mr Sarkozy’s election campaign and ignores Mr. Hollande when he visited London before his election.  When he met the new President of France at the G8 meeting he had a private meeting with him but, of course, with Mr Hollande’s refusing austerity it did not go well. Mr Hollande’s comment was afterwards “we agreed to disagree.”

Then he tells Mrs Merkel to back-up Greece with Germany’s ‘wealth’. First of all Germany’s ‘wealth’ had gone with Euro which David Cameron should be aware off. Secondly, Germany had a 0.5 per cent in the last quarter improvement. However, by now the people of Germany are just as fed-up like in Britain always paying out to other countries while austerity has been applied to them. These countries were standing on their own feet before so why are they constantly bankrupt now?  It is every year they asking for bail-out. Do wake up Leaders.

David Cameron’s famous austerity is only for the ordinary people. His cutting 16,000 police officers with two major celebrations coming up.  He cuts the Army, Navy and RAF drastically. At the moment he is planning to send troops to Syria to stop the bloodshed.  He also told the G8 leaders to increase the pressure and send more troops to increase the 300 troops already there. Do we see an escalation into a war again? Why again?

Now let’s go over to the Ministry of Defence. All this time we were told that they inherited about £38billion of debt from incapable Labour. Last week it was revealed that Defence Secretary Philip Hammond ‘found’ £12billion unspent cash. Is it a small mind that can’t work out when there is a £38billion deficit and then all of sudden £12billion emerged not being spent? Surely it doesn’t add up and £12billion can’t be that small that it vanished between the sheets of accountancy. At the same Mr Hammond insists that the redundancies will still go ahead.  All at the same time when Mr Cameron plans to get the troops ready to go to Syria.

Last week was a further £30billions swiped off the pension’s funds and plunged into a £93billion deficit.  The pension fund should not have put onto the stock exchange. Everybody knows how fickle the stock exchange is, especially at the moment, and furthermore it was the people’s money. The previous Conservative government had no right to do so. If they left it where it was before the pension fund would still be there plus accumulated interests.  That is the reason for running out of pensions and not because there are more people retired or they live longer.

Do we have to have another Einstein to solve all these riddles and confusion?