Showing posts with label public. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public. Show all posts

Saturday, 18 June 2016

POLITICIANS NOT SAFE IN DEMOCRACY NOT TODAY



It is a very sad day when MP Jo Cox died because she believed in democracy and was also fighting for migrants. RIP. It is very sad if a 41 year old lady gets gunned down and stabbed several times. What has this society come to?


This event raises a string of question about the safety of politicians. At the House of Parliament they are safe without a doubt because of security checks and armed police.

One fact weighs heavily against democracy at the present. If you have democracy you got to have a strict and just Justice. At the moment it does not exists. Drug dealers, burglars, rapists and paedophiles get mostly a warning after umpteenth convictions and if they get a prison sentence it will be halved to a few months. Murderers get life but life means 15, 20 or 25 years and on good behaviour will be reduced.

If they can claim a mental health problem, some do have and some claim they did not know what they were doing in that moment, they go into a mental secure hospital like most probably this murderer will. But his action of building a gun does not show he did not know what he was doing. Therefore the Justice needs a real wake-up and the Government to stop closing down prisons especially with a situation we have at moment. People seem to kill for the least reason.

The danger lurks when they are in their own constituencies. A survey revealed that 43 MPs out of 239 were victims of actual or attempted attacks.


This is an unacceptable situation when a MP cannot voice their opinion and fight for other people without being attack by somebody who does not agree with it.


The question is how to protect them? In short it is impossible. MPs are constantly exposed at the street or when they keep surgeries. They have to meet the public constantly.


The only idea which the Common authorities could come up with to have an aide with them when they have the surgery meeting. A Panic button which connects them direct to the Police and MI5 would also give them some protection.


All in all it has come to a terrible state in having a democracy and not being able to protect its politicians totally. Due to a number of movements the freedom which the previous generation knew is going to disappear slowly but definitely. It is exactly what these various groups want to strike fear and rule by fear.

Finally, the conclusion is that British democracy means MPs will not be safe anymore. Even democracy itself becoming doubtful the ways the Government is overruling all the time and Brussels is ruling more and more the UK.

Source Evening Standard

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

TORIES SUPPORT FURTHER £12BN BENEFIT CUTS - Update 1 April, 2017



Update: 1 April,2017 -
Today the £12bn comes into affect; sanctioned by PM May. At the same time she gave PMs a 12 percent pay rise.

This £12bn Welfare cut comes now on top of already starving, homeless poor and disabled people.

Has PM May any conscience at all?

UPDATE: 7 Dec.,  2015 

After the House of Lords rejected the first bill of £12billion Welfare cuts the Chancellor George Osborne  will now put it through as a 'reform'  and calls it 'Global Credit'. 


No
thing short of another dirty trick to run the poor and vulnerable still further into the ground.

UPDATE: 29 Oct., 2015 --

It is a disgrace for the Tories still insisting to modernise the Tridents for a cost of £167billion and eventually reaching £200billion. The first estimated cost was £95billion.A weapon which will never be used. 

Yet they are determined to cut £12billion on Welfare.
The new Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, is totally against the Trident project.

===============================================

PLRASE, PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU
==================================================

UPDATE:  21 July, 2015  --
It is a disgrace for Labour  and especially for Harriet Harman, stand-in leader, to agree with the budget.  SNP also criticised their decision. 

Labour supposed to be an opposition and they agree with a budget like that which will be nothing but devastating  for the general public. A public which is already relying on food banks  People who have committed suicide because they could not see how to go on any more and Harriet Harman supported a further welfare cut of £12billion? She should join the Tories.  She should be ashamed of herself advising her MPs to abstain.  She should have advised them to vote against it. 


At the same time the MPs getting a 10 per cent salaries rise.  !!!!!!!!!


UPDATE: 8 July, 2015 --

Chancellor George Osborn announce that he will stretch his £12billion Welfare cuts over three years instead of two years. 

It will give the people more breathing space, no doubt. but the impact is just the same. 


Stop kidding yourself and especially the public!!!!!


David Cameron supports the £12billion Welfare Cuts and admits that his MPs have found the amounts where the axe should fall.

The PM means to ‘lower welfare society’ and it is expected there will be a drastic cut across the whole welfare including tax credit for the lower paid.

Being just days after the anti-austerity march in London and other cities it looks a counter attack.

In two weeks time Chancellor George Osborne unveil the cuts in his emergency budget. Hopefully he tells the truth and all of it.

As usually the PM contemning Labour for the cost of Welfare. It is getting a bit worn out and boring after five years in office with promising austerity will bring the National debts down but the fact remains it increased by £500billion.

David Cameron does not mention that nor will he explain how it occurred. plus being graded down from seventh to sixth place.

When Gordon Brown had to face one of the biggest “credit crunch”; created by David Cameron’s friends – the Top financiers.  Yet Gordon Brown managed to come back from minus 2.5 GDB to a plus 0.5 within a year and by 2010 had a plus 1 per cent which the Tories managed to wipe it all out within three months. They never achieved the plus 1 per cent GDB.

Without a “credit crunch” the Tories managed two recessions and a downgrading but David Cameron will ignore their failure and harp on about Labour creating all the debts and huge welfare. 

Have his 95 highly paid advisers nothing else to bring to the table?  It is pathetic.

David Cameron gave a long speech in the North of England and amongst a lot of good sounding and public catching words but meaning very little if you see later the result of his actions.

He said: “We need to move from low wages, high tax and high welfare society to a high wages, low tax and low welfare society.”  As mentioned before it sounds good but the result will be a low welfare society and nothing else because his friends the manufacturing executives and owners will not paid high wages.

His words were there to make the ‘low welfare society’ more acceptable, he hopes.  The reality will be further hardship, starvation, old people dying of hypothermia and the super rich will be getting even richer, if David Cameron and the Tories are not being stopped.

The result of his always glorious sounding speeches are nothing but make belief  he even convinces himself, and trying to catch the public like he done the last five years and on the General Election with his lies and smears about Labour.

Austerity is nothing but a con. They got the UK deeper into debts with £500billion.

Tories ‘low welfare society’ for getting high wages and low tax is nothing but another con.

Saturday, 17 January 2015

GOLDMAN SACHS WILL PAY £8BILLION BONUS

In my opinion: They are not the only ones who receive such enormous bonuses. It is scandalous because especially at a time of great starvation these people pocket not only the highest salaries ever but also hundred of thousands of pounds if not millions of pounds bonuses. Yet mastermind PM David Cameron does nothing about it but planning further cuts for councils and public.


GOLDMAN SACHS BUILDING 
IN FLEET STREET,  
LONDON,  ENGLAND
This is a scandalous report beyond any comparison.  Their New York Head Quarter confirmed that the company was able to keep aside a £8,35billion which is 37 per cent of  £22.8billion turnover. Golman Sachs is the richest Tory MP in the UK.

This success is also from the Royal Mail sale. Goldman Sachs’ advisers convinced ministers to sell the Royal Mail in 2013 at such a low rate that the taxpayers lost £1billion. The shares, of course, jumped up after the sale their clients through another branch of Goldman Sachs and made £12million by buying and selling shares.  How much did the Prime Minister David Cameron and his friends gain?  He ought to be ashamed to have sold a peace of his country.

Furthermore, the Chancellor George Osborne spent £53,000 on a court case at the EU Court of Justice to fight a cap on the bankers’ bonus. He lost it but it showed his attitude.

Records reveal that in 2013 the top executives of banks received a payout of £3million.  It is the same financiers who brought down the crash in 2009 and their banks had to be bail-out with taxpayers’ money but this is apparently all forgotten but the taxpayers are still carries the burden.  By right any profit should have been paid back to the taxpayers.

==================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS. THANK YOU
==================================================
 
According to the statistics the average worker has its income lowered by £2,500 since 2010. During the same time the City bankers’ salaries increased beyond any recognition plus sky high bonuses.  The government used the crash and bail-out as an excuse to cut public service and cap the workers’ wages.  George Osborne announced that the pain had been worth it. What does he know about it? Yes, not for the Elite while the average family have to rely on food banks and can not heat their homes properly.  George Osborne has even the audacity to announce further and bigger cuts if they win the election.  God forbid.  They screwed the public deep enough into the ground while they filled the pockets beyond belief.

Within two years the Tory-led Government and the LibDem which did not exactly vote against many proposals from the Tories; they created 4000 multi-millionaires and multi-billionaires and £19trillion was syphoned off to tax haven.  PM David Cameron held big speeches, from time to time, about getting the tax avoiders but so far nothing. Cameron, of course, will not do anything about it because Goldman Sachs is one of his biggest donors.  Yet, at the same time nurses having to fight for a miserly one per cent pay rise which was agreed but Cameron will not agree to it.

David Cameron also announced and warned that there is another Global crash on the way which, most probably, been orchestrated again by the same bankers and financiers. The last time Cameron used to blame the Labour Party which of course was not their fault but global wide and he must have known that it was his top financier friends who purposely caused it. Now, since he is already aware of it why does he not do anything about it to safeguard Britain?  Surely he can and could stop the tidal wave to swamp over Britain. Now let’s see how he stands on the shores and commands the waves to turn back.

Even the cap of 100 per cent bonus of his salary is not justifiable.  How can a man’s work be worth a £2 or £3million salary from a start and then on top of it another £2 or £3million bonus? Surely no man’s work is worth that much.  Therefore the bonus schemes should be stopped.  A salary of £2 or $3million is more than well paid. Surprising the EU Court of Justice did not stop it altogether. 



Wednesday, 20 August 2014

CAMERON DESPERATE RESHUFFLE COST TAXPAYERS £180,000

Tories have £104billion in their coffer and yet charging  everything (election campaign) to the cash strapped taxpayer. Cameron has the nerve to say he cares about the working class.
It shows the length David Cameron is able to go. To even charge £180,000 to the taxpayers.

Looking back when UK Prime Minister David Cameron reshuffled his Cabinet; it cost the taxpayers nearly £180,000 for “Golden Handshakes”.  The desperate reshuffle was to improve the chance of winning the next General Election in May 2015. Since it was for the General Election and Tory's winning again it should have been taken out of the party's coffer and not the taxpayers but that is the Tories all over  It did not improve in the eyes of the general public since David Cameron just replaced them with others of his friends or as they were called in some newspaper “cronies”.

Each of the 15 Tories axed were entitled to a three months’ salary, tax-free redundancy pay.

Lord Hill’s redundancy was £25,000 in spite of walking into the next job as new European Commissioner in Brussels.  A row exploded not only on that but also about his successor Baroness Stowell being only paid £22,000 which is less than Lord Hill. David Cameron denies sexism but this clearly showed him up.

Labour MP John Mann said: “Lord Hill should hand his £25,259.50 pay-off to his successor – and urged the others to refuse the cash. None of them should get anything – particular Lord Hill who is going to a hugely salaried job in Europe. They should do what the rest of the country is doing and tighten their belts. Other people do not get a pay-off when they are sacked and in many cases this is rewards for failure.  The honourable thing to do would be not to take a penny and the whole system should be scrapped.”

================================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU
================================================================

Dominic Grieve, personal fortune around £3million, received a £23,943 after been sacked as Attorney General.

Owen Patterson, worth around £1.5million, and David Jones received £17,206.75.

Ken Clarke, a millionaire, holding shares in BP, BAT and Diageo at the last election and have an estimated value of £600,000. Has Ken Clarke been dumped because of the allegations of child abuse?  For whatever reason he was axed; he is entitle to £8,000.

Sir George, nicknamed as the bicycling baron, owns a family home in Hampshire worth £650,000 and a £500,000 flat in London.  His total fortune has not been revealed but he stood to receive a £8,000.

Energy minister Greg Barker, has a fortune o £7,4million from selling his stake in recruitment advertising firm, was also entitled to £8,250.50 when he was sacked.

Two more millionaires, former investment banker Hugh Robertson and ex-oil trader Alan Duncan also received the same amount of money.  Not quite millionaires but on the ladder up, still receive the same pay out was Andrew Lansley, David Willetts, Damian Green and Andrew Robathan.

Stephen Hammond and Nick Hunt got £5,924.25 each when they were sacked as junior ministers. Oliver Heald had £14,812 when he was ousted as Solicitor General.

The rule is such; they are entitled to their redundancy pay if they do not get a new ministerial job within three weeks.

The taxpayers had to dish out a total of £176,280 for people who have more or less a fortune themselves.  While the same taxpayers having to rely on food banks and making decision whether to put food on the table or in the coming winter heat their home. The Tories turned this country from an average good living into Dickson time.

A remark from the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg:  “David Cameron’s reshuffle showed that the head bangers have won”.

He pointed out further that the promotion of right-wing Euro sceptic Tories meant that his coalition partners were now even more “extreme” and the Tories moves to rip up the Human Rights Act.

He added: “The Conservative want to line up with Vladimir Putin and other tyrants by tearing up our tradition of human rights.”

Wednesday, 2 October 2013

CONSERVATIVES DONT WANT TO KNOW Update 31 March 2017



Theresa May previously inefficient Home Secretary became UK Prime Minister.
She introduced £12bn Welfare cuts which Osborne planned. Now, before Christmas she let the Universal Credit roll which stops payment for six weeks. Graciously she reduced it to five weeks.

It seems May is only following orders of Cameron and Osborne although they both left Parliament but May still carries on with their plans. Why? Would she lose her job if she decided differently? Both £12bn Welfare cuts and UC will be devastating on disabled and poor, starving, homeless people but the Tories do not care.



DAVID CAMERON PUTS ON

 SO MUCH WEIGHT 
IN ONLY THREE YEARS 
WHILE FAMILIES ARE
STARVING.  
IT TELLS YOU ALL
Update 31 March 2017
After a questionable win of GE2015 David Cameron resigned. 
Theresa May is now Prime Minister but cuts in Welfare are still implemented as laid down by Mr Osborne and Mr Cameron. There is no change. People are starving and homeless but now there are new cuts coming in on 1 April 2017 while £209bn for Trident and £70bn for HS2 train are available. No funds for NHS and schools which are in financial trouble.

After years of devastating governing by the Conservatives mainly and their coalition partner LibDem it is obvious that they haven’t got a clue or better still all for themselves. Therefore it was not a surprise David Cameron did not know the price of a loaf of bread stating he is making his own, no not even that, surely it must be his staff making his loaf of bread.  He could not exhaust himself early in the morning by putting in the ingredients and then pressing the button. He also does not even use the flour from the supermarkets not even organic flour but special flour from Cotswold. It must be GM free which his ministers praise and trying to convince the public there is nothing wrong with GM grown products.  It costs £4.38 for a 1.5kg bag.  If there is nothing wrong with GM grown products why spend so much money and have the same food? Chancellor George Osborne does not get his burgers from McDonald around the corner but delivered by taxi from a restaurant miles away



BORIS JOHNSON  
 
AMBITION TO BE
PRIME MINISTER

Boris Johnson, when he was Mayor of London, is none the better when asked how much a pint of milk cost; he answered £0.80 on the TV interview on Monday Newsnight. The interviewer Jeremy Paxman corrected him it was £0.40. It is again no surprise when he earns £250,000 a year and called it “chickenfeed” which indicates that he has other incomes and much, much bigger.  He also spends £1.57million on spin doctors and David Cameron £1.45million. Are the hard-up taxpayers footing the bills for that? Definitely.

==================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS.  THANK YOU.
==================================================

These are the kind of people who agree with cut backs and trying to lay down the law telling the already hard-up public how to run their lives. It proves they have not got a clue or do not want to have; which is not a surprising with incomes and backgrounds they have.

While David Cameron’s children get their bread made in a top range Panasonic £139 machine with £4.38 for a 1.5kg of flour for their breakfast many children haven’t even got a breakfast before they go to school because their parents can’t even afford a standard loaf of bread and their parents rely on the school meal for them to be fed.  This situation is the result of years of government by the Conservatives and the LibDem. They ought to be ashamed of themselves.

In spite of it all the Prime Minister spoke in his final speech about building an economy to bring down the debt and hope for a better future.  The public heard by now so many promises and it is not surprising too many people lost their trust, according to the opinion poll, in the government and their politics. Yet David Cameron, including his spin doctors, still handing out promises by the bag full. Are they not aware of the mood of the public? At least their spin doctors should be.




Thursday, 24 January 2013

CAMERON'S SPEECH ON EU'S MEMBERSHIP- Update 13 April,2013

PM DAVID CAMERON
UPDATE: 13 April, 2013 --  UK Prime Minister David Cameron is this weekend at the German Chancellor Angela Merkel's official country seat to hold further discussion about the EU membership. Will it make any difference? NO, apart from getting out of the EU it will be always more than costly which the taxpayers have to foot the bill and they are more than cash strapped. They are so badly off that a great majority have to decide whether to buy food or heat their homes.   It is a disgrace to cut down incomes and benefits to that extend. 

UPDATE:  25 January 2013 -  Well, well, well, Brussels really showing its teeth now.  They threatening  the UK to fine it a £250,000 a day because they haven't applied their full law on gas and electricity. According to the Department of Energy it would make the electricity and gas bills even higher. Or is it another story trying to justify another increase?

If any one still had any doubts about getting out of the EU they surely must change their opinion now. Furthermore, Brussels will also control the press and journalists will be fined heavily if they don't comply with their rules. Well, free press was always the mark of the Western World.

IT WAS NOTHING BUT A VOTE CATCHING SPEECH  AND FULL OF HOLLOW PROMISES.

The long awaited speech of David Cameron was finally delivered. Yet, there was nothing new in it. Everybody is aware that Mr Cameron does not want to get out of the EU.

He did make a great point about given the public the referendum they had been demanded for a long time but it is not the straight forward IN/OUT referendum. He still wants to sneak in his hopefully newly achieved condition. He still thinks he can persuade Brussels to give Britain back certain powers which they took off this country. He couldn’t have heard or listen to the announcement from Brussels that they will not do anything like that because otherwise all the other countries will demand changes in their rules as well.

Even after Merkel quickly reassured David Cameron that she will try and negotiate on behalf of Britain to change Britain’s mind not to exit the EU. The point here is that Merkel wants to keep Britain in the EU for not to lose the contribution and if necessary another bail-out. It is not only Merkel’s negotiation but the other 28 countries have also to agree. This makes it most unlikely. Furthermore, Merkel knows if Britain exits the EU others will follow.

However, whether Merkel, David Cameron or Mr Obama want to keep Britain in the EU or not it is the people who should have given the opportunity for a long time to decide.  The Conservative promised to give an IN/OUT referendum in their last election manifesto but as all their other promises it was not kept. It was promised again for March 2011 but again nothing happen.

The public elects a party to govern the country but it is the public’s wishes the leader supposed to carry out. It is wrong that David Cameron thinks Britain should be kept in the EU and therefore ignores the people’s wishes.

The speech today was a waste of ink, paper and time. The people knew his attention already and to tangle a carrot in front of the public’s noses about an in/out referendum but also with some included decision of new regulations and after the next election was all totally unsatisfactory.  The public is not that naĂŻve any more when is David Cameron delivering a speech with concrete facts and stands by it?

People wanted an in/out referendum now and not after he signed another treaty soon for the next seven years. Brussels interfered enough with the Law and justice which cost a fortune on legal aid and benefit; with the fishery to throw dead fish overboard because it was already over the quota; to give French fishermen the right to fish in British waters; having to pay Child benefit for children not even living in Britain; fruit having to be unformed seizes and tonnes of fruit being wasted; and many more other crazy ideas and made law but the best is yet to come. Brussels plans to control the press and journalists will be find if they step over the rules.

BRITAIN GETS ALL THAT FOR ITS EU MEMBERSHIP WHICH COST A FORTUNE AT A TIME WHEN FAMILIES HAVING TO GO TO FOOD BANKS TO SURVIVE. 

The people want out of it and at the same time want to save the money since Britain is in an economic recession and yet David Cameron refuses.  This policy does not make sense.

WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON?

Friday, 30 November 2012

UK PM STANDS UP FOR CITY OF LONDON


Prime Minister David Cameron was defending the City of London and banks from a take-over by the EU. Mr Cameron would definitely protect the City of London and banks from being included into the European Central Bank system which will have its head office in Frankfurt.

The reason is that he is so adamant because they are his boys and contribute heavily to the economy. He does not lift a finger to stop the gas, electricity and petrol’s prices rising because these are affecting the ordinary people. Yet, the gas and electricity showed a profit of over £1.5billion last year and surely would have been more than enough to stay that way instead of increasing the tariffs by up to 10 per cent.
A
So far the coalition did not show any care whatsoever towards the public. Yet, his motto was “We are all in this together” which was soon forgotten when elected and they showed their real faces.

Furthermore, when everybody went up in arms about the banks and city’s sky high bonuses and people demanded from Prime Minister, times and times again, to stop it; he kept promising it but did nothing. Yet, when OCCUPY formed and started first to camp in city but then in front of St Paul’s Cathedral in no time at all David Cameron got a law through the court that they should be removed.

Both incidents show clearly how one-sided the government is which is totally wrong. It is forgotten or just brushed aside that it is the general public voted them in and it is the general public they should represent.


Tuesday, 20 November 2012

CITY TRADER -- MONEY TO WASTE

That is how Mr Cameron's and Tories' friends live while families are brought down so low they have to rely on food banks. Mr Cameron still puts on a show of concern about the "hard-working people".

A city trader spent this incredible sum of £40k in one night. He treated nine friends to a night out and partying beside a famous film star of Hollywood on the night of Halloween. An eye witness stated the he didn’t hold back the moment he saw this famous star and maybe he tried to show off at the Raffles in Chelsea’s Kings Road.

They city trader started with 10 Zombie cocktails which are made of rum, absinthe and grapefruit at £30 each.

Soon he was dancing the night away at the 230 capacity members only club. When the famous star turned up at 11pm the city trader ordered three giant bottles of vintage Dom Perignon champagne methuselahs amounting to  £24,000. After came seven bottles of vintage Dom Perignon Oenotheque 1996 adding another £3,500; two Belvedere jeroboam vodkas adding £1,640; seven glasses of Don Julio 1942 tequila adding £224; two vintage Dom Perignon Rose 2000 magnums adding £2,200; six bottles of Krug rose adding £2,400; Red Bull for £87.50; Havanna rum at £350 and finally 16 cafĂ© parton with tequila adding £160.00.

The final bill came to £34,861.40 plus £5,229.23

This is a glimpse how the city boys live and the world they live in. To spent £40k in one night without padding the eye lid while the country struggles to survive and not only the ordinary people but also the economy and the government does nothing to curb their bonuses. At the very same time David Cameron and his friends always shouting about AUSTERITY and benefits have to be cut for England’s economy to survive.

To spent this kind of money in one night they must be used to it. This only can be done with all their high salaries and top bonuses. Therefore, the prime minister and the coalition should step in where it should be done. Also the Bank of England was talking about and promised to bring in regulation of the bank and city.
This regulation had been well overdue and when the people started a movement under the name of OCCUPY they soon were removed but the government will no confront the banks and city.  It is no wonder when banks go bankrupt but then the government makes the taxpayer to step in to rescue them. Yet when it shows a profit it is soon distributed in bonuses instead of being made to pay it back to the taxpayers.

There is another broken promise of David Cameron of stopping these huge bonuses. Times and again he promised but when it came to it, it was quietly sidelined. At stage he said it takes time to do this but when Occupy launched a protest in no time he had it through the courts and they were removed. All the government’s action is certainly one-sided and not democratic.

All this mess is since Margaret Thatcher de-regulated the banking and finance system. That lady has a lot to answer for, for the shamble ever since exists and until the government does not regulate the banks and finance market there will be nothing but scandals coming up.

The scandal of the Libor but after it hit the headline we never heard anything about it and apart from one man being sacked but with a more than fat golden handshake which should have never been given. He also will receive big pension while ordinary people’s pension is getting cut.

David Cameron is certainly in this altogether and he must be smirking away at the ordinary people he keeps well down. However in the long run it will backfire in the economy when next year all the cuts will bite and the people have even less to spend. Well it also could be that the public will remember and not being swayed by more promises in the future. Time will tell.

Wednesday, 31 October 2012

CAMERON ABANDONED ANOTHER PROMISE



In his election manifesto he promised to be tough on crime. Looking back it makes it obvious that he never met one of his promises. UK and especially the major cities are swamped by crime and the police had a hard job before to keep it down. Therefore the Conservatives gave this promise to get voters on their site because people were fed-up being attacked on the streets and in their houses.

Yes, the Conservatives won the election, only by a minority and built a coalition with the Liberal Democrats.
The moment they were in power they abandon most if not all of their promises including the one being tough on crimes. Furthermore, they cut the police force right down in sacking 16,000 police officers at a time when the streets were riddle with crimes. Especially the elderly and disabled people were not safe because they couldn’t fight back.

Now the Home Secretary Theresa May announced that she will half the sums for crime prevention.  London will cut from £57million to £23million in 2013/14.  Wales from £3.1million to £1.2million.

This will affect the CCTV which is the greatest help to catch criminals, youth project, street lighting and gang prevention work.

No wonder Theresa May is the favourite of David Cameron in spite of her many mess-ups and frequent calls for her to be forced out or her willingly resign from her post.

These further cuts will also show in losing thousands of staff and especially 6,500 frontline officers.

All these reduction will provoke more crime and it will backfire in having more criminals locked up in what they claim in overfilled prisons. This also will result into more cost of keeping these criminals which in the long run does not justify the means of cutting down the police force as well as on crime prevention. When you cut down the impact has also to be looked at. This apparently is not the case made by the government and therefore it will have a chaotic impact on the public.

Next month there will be an election of 41 police and crime prevention commissioners. They are not given an idea what the budget will be and only after 15 November they will have to face the budget they have to work with.  The new commissioners will be in charge of chief constables and take over crime prevention budgets. This is not democracy as it should be. In a democracy all the facts are on the table and the candidates are able to discuss the situation with voters.

Apparently the cities which were worst hit by last year riots have to face the biggest cut. Birmingham will be cut from £1.5million to £620,000, Manchester from £1million to £415,000 and Leeds from £1.1million to £478,000.

CUTTING ALL THE BENEFITS AND SECURITY BY CUTTING DOWN THE POLICE AND THEIR FUNDING MAKES YOU WONDER IF THEY FIND ANYTHING ELSE TO THROW AT THE PUBLIC.  THEY FORGOT THAT IS IT THE PUBLIC WHO VOTED THEM IN AND NOW THEY ARE KICKING THE PUBLIC IN THE TEETH NON-STOP.

Sunday, 21 October 2012

CAMERON'S IN/OUT REFERENDUM ON EU -- Updated 1 June, 2016


PM DAVID CAMERON
UPDATED: 1 June, 2016 --
Vote for the IN/OUT of EU is on 23 June, 2016 and already scandals appear that non-British people have received voting cards. Is it a slip-up or not. Can we have one guess?

UPDATED: 22 May, 2015 -- Well, the voters fell for it again and hopefully for all our sake Cameron will deliver this time. Time will tell.

UPDATE: 16 February, 2015 - - There are definitely great changes on the way. PM David Cameron promised now to bring the referendum forward to 2016, Ian Duncan Smith, head of the Department of work and Pensions, found all the right keys on his I.T. to set up the promised Universal Credit and is able to pay the people their due money in only a few months' time. Banks and Corporations start paying their taxes and the Treasury already received hundreds of thousands of pounds. Will the voters fall for this again? Hopefully not. Remember 2010!

UPDATE: 22 December 2014 -- The referendum on IN/OUT of the EU being amended and the Labour Party demands more amendments. Details are not given to the public. The major issue is, in the public eye, that David Cameron promised in his election manifesto in 2010 he would give the people of Britain a referendum if he won the election. It could have been a major point for people putting their mark in the wrong box. As you can see his promises were never met. 

Now it is 2017 by which he is hoping to be elected again. Would the public fall for another promise which might or most probably might not be kept again?  In General the public had the worst austerity and nothing but false promises. It might change now because the election is coming closer.


UPDATE:  22 June 2013 --  David Cameron put now an IN/OUT referendum to the vote of House of Commons MPs. The many stages are called reading and the first reading of IN/OUT was almost unanimously voted for OUT. The second reading for 2017 was turn down by the majority. Everybody demands it now and had been demanding it for long time. David Cameron dragged it out and now it is too late for passing it through the various stages to be effective before the general election in 2015. It was nothing but a election stunt and Cameron thought he could get away with it.Now he will sign another treaty for seven years throwing tens of billions of pounds to an EU which nothing but squanders money by the millions and billions. Well done Mr Cameron.


UPDATE:  4 April 2013 -- Does David Cameron really still believes he can retrieve the power from Brussels or is he only trying to blind the public to stretch the time till he can sign for another seven years? The public is up in arms and wants out because of the money wasted in 

At long last David Cameron announced his true intention of not having an in/out referendum on EU. It was revealed during the PRIME MINISTER QUESTION TIME.

The House of Commons has a rule of having a Prime Minister Question time in Parliament where he has a duty to be accountable to the British People when he is questioned by MPs. The Speaker of Commons points at the MP who had raised his/her hand and is then allowed to put his/her question forward.  Prime Ministers can be evasive but still have to answer the question.

Mr Cameron did not comply with this rule when asked by the Labour MP Chris Bryant about the links between Downing Street and Mr Murdoch. Mr Cameron’s answer was that until he receives an apology for accusation he will not answer the question. This was against the rules of the Parliament but Mr Cameron, not so surprisingly, got away with it because the Speaker John Bercow did not call David Cameron out of order and made him answer the question. 
.
It was totally out of order because the very name Prime Minister Question Time says it all and is part of democracy.

Then Labour MP Natasha Engel put the question to Mr Cameron that Education Secretary Michael Gove stated if there would be a referendum on in/out of EU, he would vote to leave.  She asked the Prime Minister how he would vote.

This time Mr Cameron answer was that he does not want an in/out referendum because he is not happy to leave the EU. At long last Mr Cameron speaks his true intention as before he was hedging all the time.  No wonder the press calls him ‘Dodgy Dave’.  A Prime Minister is there to state openly his intention and inform the public. And not dodging and diving, thinking the public does not see it.

He has done the same with signing papers granting Scotland the right for an in/out referendum of the United Kingdom. Soon after that he stated that he does not want Scotland to leave which is completely contradictory.  Deep down he does want Scotland to leave because there is the majority of Labour voters which would or could dip the scale in the next general election.

Regarding the EU Mr Cameron stated further that he thinks the majority of the public wants a new settlement with the EU. The new settlement will be in a referendum put to the people to vote on. It will also be put into his next manifesto. Mr Cameron safe yourself for both, the time and paper. As he so arrogantly put it that the ‘majority’of people will not vote on either of it.

Mr Cameron also enlightened the public that he intends to put it into his manifesto which is  a pledge to seek  to negotiate the repatriation of significant powers from Brussels. This will be followed by a new referendum to choose between the “new deal” and the status quo. However, there will be no mentioning of in/out of the EU on the pallet papers.

Doubtfully these pledges and promises would stop the Tories’ MPs migrating to the UKip who are determined about the in/out vote.  Mr Cameron still thinks that he can smokescreen with fine words and pledges. The public never seen one pledge fulfilled from the last election manifesto. Also the words to pledge to seek negotiation to repatriate powers from Brussels are to thin to be believed.  Mr Cameron seems to be turning more and more into a man who convinces himself during his speeches and feels full of pride about having delivered a great speech but as they say "action speaks louder than words".