OVER 2,300 DISABLED PEOPLE DIED till 2012 NOW 4,000

SUMMARY   Although almost a decade ago but Osborne's vicious and deadly cuts still effects people and Councils. Now he departs to an even more lucrative job joining Bankers while he left UK in the worst financial crisis but CONservatives will blame it on Covid.  

Update 30 Jan., 2018 -- May keeps ex-Chancellor George Osborne planned £12bn Welfare cuts and started it on 1 April, 2017 plus £16bn Public Service cuts. Why has she sacked him when she still follows his plans?

MAY - BRANSON - HUNT

By now 4,000 Disabled People died by suicide or starvation. 

She also wants to start the Universal Credit (UC) but the date gets postponed. In some counties it has been introduced and it causes chaos and hardship and suicides. May still insists of spreading it right across. The problem is that there is no payment for 5 weeks.  ????

Updated 2 April, 2017
Ian Duncan Smith did resign, George Osborn got sacked as Chancellor and David Cameron resign but PM May still let their Disability Benefit cuts start on 1 April, 2017. It means Disabled people receive £70 per week instead of £100 pw. There will be more death of starvation and suicides!

Nobody can live on £70 a week - paying bills, buying food and heat the home !!!!!!

Updated 16 Sept., 2016 --
Although David Cameron resigned and even left Parliament there will  be no change under the new Tory Prime Minister Theresa May. It might get even worse and it has!!

UPDATED: 31 August, 2015 --
It was assumed over 1,000 disabled people died since they had been forced back to work and their benefits were  cut. People were left with hardly or no money at all. They committed suicide or starved to death.

Now the true figure, and it is hoped it is true,  is over 2,300 up till 2012 and that in the 21st century and UK the sixth richest country while IDS hands out a £44million bonus.  He ought to be sacked.

To crown it all Ian Duncan Smith, Head of the Department of Welfare and Pensions, sent out leaflets of false statements from non-existing people that they were glad to have their benefits 
cut because it forces them to make a greater effort to find work.


David Cameron excels himself by posing with charities and giving great sounding speeches but the reality tells a different story.  While he is posing and smiling into the camera he is cutting the most vulnerable's benefit. That how sincere he is.

UPDATED: 17 December, 2014 --  Atos lost its contract because they have a backlog of 700,000 applications for assessment. It is not know whether these disabled people are still receiving some money. The government handed out a new contract to Maximus which is an American company but already had been in court for discrimination of disabled people and fraud. How can David Cameron employ a company like that?  Has he got any principles and respect?

UPDATE 19 OCTOBER 2012 --- By now the statics show around a 1,000 died. It might not all of them purely related to be forced back to work but surely a great number of them had an earlier death due to extra strain on their health and worries.

Since this scheme began of forcing disabled people back to work a statement shows that 32 disabled people died. Well done Government especially Prime Minister David Cameron while he is floundering around from one summit to another including vanishing to visit vineyards and all on taxpayers’ money. He can’t even fly first class and hires a private yet again all on taxpayers’ money and when he returns he claims every existing and non-existing expenses.

They were assessed by doctors paid by the private health service Atos French Company) which in turn is paid by the government costing just billions of pounds. The doctors were told they should certify only one in eight not to be able to work again.

Labour’s shadow energy minister Tom Greater asking the question how Atos could get it so wrong. These people died within a few weeks after being force back to work. They ought to be ashamed to make these people go through a tortuous procedure to reverse the assessment.

On revelation of these terrible loss of lives and only because the government wanted to save £10billion from the benefit bill a review by health specialist Prof Malcolm Harrington CBE suggested a change. He requested a testing which makes it fairer and humane. His suggestion was not taken up, of course not. At the end he was even requested to step down as a government adviser. It seems more and more the government getting tough and regardless.

Ministers agreed that a “fresh pair of eyes “ are needed but by the look of things happen in the recent past it will not be agreed on by the top men because it would cut down their scheme saving £10billion

Apparently the LibDem announced a fight to stop this crazy idea.

This is a terrible result showing 32 disabled people dying within a few weeks. We ask again how the Prime Minister David Cameron, Chancellor George Osborne, at least he was poohed by 80,000 and should have got the message, and the rest of his friends can sit there seeing these people struggling with an heroic effort and cut their Disability Benefit? They live in a life of luxury and have no idea what ordinary life is like especially for disabled people and yet they calmly wilding the axe. What kind of human beings are they?  Yet they fiddled they way in with riding on bikes pretending they are ordinary people, the limousines were following them with briefcase, and now they show their real faces and it will get worse.

They have the shortest working time and yet they tell everyone to work and work harder.

JUSTINE GREENING DEMANDS TO CUT FOREIGN AID -- UPDATED 26 Nov 2013

UPDATE:  26 November 2013 -- Records show now that the previous promise to stop aid to India and cut aid in general proved wrong. India received again £280million which is even an increase of £30million. Yet India is building a rocket to Mars which not even Britain or any other European county can afford or attempt to do it.

Ms Greening's promises is another led down of this government.  £280million spend in Britain would eliminate the great poverty. Unbelievable as it is that British people suffer great poverty yet they are giving all these millions of pounds to countries and it does not get passed on to the poor for which it was intended. All the rulers living a live of extreme luxury and Britain gives more  money.

UPDATE:  3 December 2012 -- Justine Greening is the first and only minister who makes sense in this government. She stops aid to India and Rwanda. Hopefully she will stop more. 

For the first time we read about some sense in the government. The new International Development Secretary Justine Greening had quite a confrontation with the Prime Minister David Cameron regarding cuts in Foreign Aid. It is not  a question of not wanting to help the poor of the third world; it is question of never reaching the needy. These monies seem to vanish into their government's pockets.

She pointed out and quite rightly so that this country has great financial problems with families struggling.

Since everything gets cut why has the Foreign aid increase to £11.5billlion? Even that would be more or less acceptable if it reaches the real poor and needy. But since the 50s, since the Foreign aid programme was established it does not show any improvement in any of these countries. Something somewhere is going wrong.

=================================================
PLEASE BE SO KIND AND CLICK ON ADVERTS. THANK YOU
==================================================

Well some stories coming out that India sends an unmanned rocket mission to Mars. However, they still getting Foreign aid for the poor after all this and sneering at it calling it chicken feed. if they see it as chicken feed it proves their enormous wealth. India is also buying three warships. The UK alone spends £280million and it will be an incredible sum when the other countries are added to it.  Furthermore, when you visit India the poor are still living in the same conditions as in the last decades.  India is a very rich country on minerals and if they would spend is correctly there would be no need for Foreign aid plus the living standard of the poor would be improved greatly.

The same refers to most of the African countries. Most of them swimming in oil and yet the UK sends aid.  Many of the chieftain or kings of these countries have a number of luxuries yets, top quality cars by the number and an unknown numbers of top villas in Paris and south of France and top houses most properly in London and New York.  

It is also known that Africa is a graveyard of school and hospitals. In other words they start building to show that they are improving the live of the poor and when the inspection is over the building stops.

Why on earth aren’t the leaders looking into it more closely where all these millions and billions go? All the countries in Europe have huge debts and are on the verge of bankruptcy and yet they sent millions and billions of aid to these countries and without question. Does that make sense?

Again here is another promise from the election manifesto in 2010 that no further increase of Foreign aid will be planned.  Let’s hope for all our sake that Ms Greening put some sense into the Prime Minister and his Chancellor and stops it all.

The Chancellor planned till 2014-15 that the Department of International Development (in other words Foreign Aid) and Department of Health budget are shielded from cuts. Department of Health budged he can’t mean the NHS because it gets cuts to ribbons. So there is another U-turn. 

Chancellor George Osborn and Prime |Minister David Cameron turn around quicker than revolving door in a strong wind.

Now a whisper goes round in Whitehall and that is another laugh that George Osborne ‘plans’ to end the protection after 2015 ‘if’ the Tories win the next election, If that is a fish hook in front of the public; don’t bite because all the promises were never fulfilled or maybe they do it this time..

HUMAN RIGHTS FOR WHOM?

There is too much controversy and contradiction surrounding the Human Rights. First of all who is running this country? Is it the court in Strasbourg or the government, Department of Justice and Home Secretary?

Too often it is explained that because of their Human Rights they can’t be deported.  That is a smoke screen and flat excuse as ever there was. The Italian and Spanish deport them all the time regardless of Human rights. They pay the fine of a few thousand pounds and that is it for them. Why can’t Britain do the same?

According to the Government official statement there are 371,000 foreign nationals in Britain living on benefits. It is assumed that about 5,000 illegal immigrants receiving benefit and it adds up to £42million.

The culprit in this mis-management is the UK Border Agency. Again it was privatised and the mess began. According to the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration it was found there are at least 150,000 illegal immigrants living in Britain. An awful lot of people roaming in the street and nobody knows who they are.

==============================================================
IF YOU SEE AN ADVERT WHICH INTERESTS YOU PLEASE CLICK ON IT TO FIND MORE DETAILS
===============================================================

Apparently the UKBA has only contact 40 per cent of them so far. An even greater idiocy is that the UKBA lets people walk in and when the cases are coming to court the judges let them stay on account of their Human Rights whether they are terrorists, murders or rapists. As mentioned earlier on, other countries just deport them and when it comes to court in Strasbourg they have to pay the fine. It is definitely cheaper than paying out all these benefits, prison or whatsoever. There is no accuse of not deporting them.

A few fine example. Two Somali criminals succeeded to stay in the UK because of the HR. They had on their list robbery, drug dealings, burglary and threaten to kill.

Another one from Lithuania who had a string of sex offence in his country was allowed to stay and raped a 40 year old woman. They still won’t deport him after he served his prison sentence because he is leaning again on HRs.

Six Islamic terrorists could not be deported to Algeria and Theresa May accused the action because they were in great danger.

Same as with Abu Qatada who fights for seven years deportation and hides behind HRs.  It must have cost millions by now with benefits and legal fees for the courts.

The list could go on and on. There is no criticism on decent foreign immigrants coming to this country and does right. It is pointing criminals which never change, coming to this country have audacity to carry on their vile crimes and demand to be supported by taxpayers’ money, instead of being grateful that they have a better life. Not asking but demanding everything they can get hold of.

Pay the fine like the Italians do and deport them, The Italian couldn’t give a damn so why should Britain? To come to this country and abuse it in every way where is the Human Rights for the people in Britain?

REMEMBER CAMERON CHILLAXING

First of all chillaxing is a new word and it was put together by chilling out and relaxing. Just to keep people up to date with the latest.

The public is under the greatest pressure for almost a decade because of the cut back by the government. The real cuts of various benefits has not even had the full impact yet but there seems no end of spending and also wasting money in the government. They should have the greatest austerity because they using and living on taxpayers’ money.

On the trip to Australia for the Commonwealth summit David Cameron vanished again and it was only a two days summit. You would think he would dedicate this very short time to improve the economy. He did the same last year and went on a private tour and tipple to the Sandalford Winery in Swan Valley. The Prime Ministry, apart from other chillaxing, is known for his boozy Sunday.  After all he has to relax after the hard work he does during the week in Parliament.

All together it was a four-day International tour and ended with the Commonwealth summit. David spent £821,000 in four days and most went on a chartered private jet. The Euro crisis was ‘dealt with’ at Brussels and 23 officials flew straight to Australia and were late again as in the year before. The vanishing trip cost the tax payer at least £12,800 pfficially.

Since they went there late already any one would expect that the Prime Minister would use every minute to solve the crises to some extent and met as many other leaders as possible in the short time.

One civil servant who worked there at the time of Gordon Brown and Tony Blair stated that none of them would have ever thought of wandering off to a vineyard. It just shows fully his attitude towards Britain and British people plus the economy. He must be desperate to use the little time he was there to visit a vineyard, have private tour and sample the wines.  If he was so desperate he should have done in his own time and after the summit.

Australia Prime Minister was wondering why Cameron skipped an official dinner and the summit final day. She commented that there is a lot of pressure on people’s time given fully to the issue in the global economy. 

To skip the official dinner and the final day was also an insult to the Commonwealth summit and Australia’s Prime Minister who arranged it all. Such bad manner from a Prime Minister who is the leader of Britain and had high education is unacceptable.

Apparently Mr Cameron did not show a lot of strain at the Sandalford’s private tour and sampled vintage wines of its finest. 

But we don’t want to miss out on the white-wash. Downing Street stated the high cost was because the plane should have gone to Japan, New Zealand and Saudi Arabia instead. Now that is a real reason. Isn't it? This is not an explanation or justification. It shows even more his arrogance to charter a jet which was chartered already to these countries.  

A spokesman stated further that it is important for the Prime Minister to represent the UK at the Commonwealth meeting. Surely he would have impressed them more by flying first class with a scheduled airline. He would have even got there on time and if the Royal family uses first class who the hell does HE thinks he is?  He forgets that he has been voted in by the people and therefore should serves them to his fullest abilities.

This is also not the first time Cameron wondered off. When he was in Chicaco for the Nato summit he done the same thing. He vanished to do some 'shopping'. He seems to be using all these highly important trip just with one thing on his mind to get his private life well feathered. The whole attitude to his duty is unbelievable and unacceptable. He just keeps letting the people down times and times again. 

Yet he keeps getting away with it all the time.

IT   IS   NOTHING   BUT   A   SCANDAL

NEWS ON PHONE HACKING SCANDAL -- Update 26 June, 2014

REBEKAH BROOKS

UPDATE:  26 June 2014 --  The verdict was Rebekah Brooks is cleared of all charges. How much the family of the Milli Dowler feel? How can that happen? She was an Editor and an Editor has the final check what goes into the paper.  Also it should not been allowed that David Cameron's brother was on the defence team. 

The Leveson inquiry was a "white wash" and now this verdict which nobody in the land will buy it. Of course, Coulson and the other will be sentenced  Their career be destroyed and their families.


UPDATE:  17 April. 2014 -- The Court case is on for weeks and Rebekah Brooks, Editor, and Andy Coulson, Editor, both deny knowledge of phone hacking of the murdered school girl Milly Dowler.  Coulson admits he should have paid more attention to what was going on. He was in charge when Rebekah Brooks was away and private investigator Glenn Mulcaire was hacking Milly Dowler's phone.

Brooks and Coulson deny conspiracy to hack phones and other charges.  In  my opinion they were both editors which means checking out.  Trial continues.


UPDATE:  4 October 2013  - September has come and gone but no news about the trial or did with miss it? Is there a news blackout?



UPDATE 18 OCTOBER 2012 ---  Brooks supposed to have appeared at the end of the month but now has been delayed till September next year. W H Y?  Surely the inquiry and investigation has been going on long enough. They must have all the information together by now. Is there a hope growing that the public might forget and Brooks, Coulson and the rest of them quietly fade away?

Even the Prime Minister David Cameron forgotten his promise on transparency and kept the emails between him Brooks and Coulson from the Levenson Inquiry.

Rebekah Brooks who was the editor of the News of the World was yesterday in court and was being charged with plotting to hack into the voicemail of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler. Mrs Brooks was the only one in the dock. She wore a navy blue jacket and skirt. During the few minutes hearing at the Westminster Magistrates’ Court in central London she only had to confirm her name, address and date of birth.

MURDERED SCHOOLGIRL MILLY DOWLER

The court ordered her not to contact the rest of the ex-employees of the News of the Word. They all will have to appear at the Southwark Crown Court at the end of the month. Mrs Brooks will also have to appear in court regard the alleged conspired to pervert the cause of justice.

Her general charge given yesterday, could amount to 600 victims and another two charges referring to the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler and ex-union boss Andrew Gilchrist. This is the worst of all their hacking because Milly was missing for a long time and to hack her voicemail and it was said the messages were eliminated is the lowest deed someone can stoop to. Brooks might not have done it but as an editor must have realised it because she was responsible what goes into print. So no pleading innocence.


.

The accused are Mrs Rebekah Brooks ex-editor of the closed-down News of the World, private investigator Glen Malcaire, Andy Coulson former editor and spin-doctor for David Cameron, former managing editor Stuart Kuttner, former news editor Greg Miskiw, and former head of news Ian Edmondson, ex-chief reporter James Weatherup.

Brooks had been released on bail.

They face charges of conspiracy to intercept voicemail between October 3, 2000 and August 9, 2006.  

REMEMBER ELECTION 2010

CAMERON WILL HAVE NOW ANOTHER LAUGH AT US
AND MAY STILL LAUGHING BUT SLOWLY RUNNING OUT OF IT WITH BREXIT

UPDATE:  24, February 2015 ---  Cameron demands the Green Party to take part in the TV Election Programme.  It is surprising so shortly after Farage put his foot in with Paris shooting. All this time Cameron would not have even UKIP in the TV Election Discussion. Is it a new move to ensure a win using the Greens as a standby since he knows the UKIP lost too many voters with Farage showing at long last his real face and the voters also cotton on that UKIP was established as a standby? The UKIP poll must have dropped greatly for Cameron wanting the Green Party there. However, the Green Party did not give a good interview. Is that Cameron's aim?

UPDATE:  13 Oct., 2014  ---  What will it be the next time to force a win for the Tories? PM David Cameron already working on a exclusion of Scottish MPs'vote. If he gets this new law through, as promised, by the end of the year, it will keep 40 Labour MPs from Scotland out. It will be a clear winner for the Tories. The danger comes from UKIP. Even the Leader Nigel Farage was a Tory and by now so many Tories MPs have defected that is looks like a twin which will close up again after the next General Election.  Napoleon once said: "Never trust a traitor." There is a lot of truth in it.  It looks like the UKIP pretends to be an alternative but but too many facts speak against it. 

Farage promise a referendum of YES/NO for EU membership because he knows people want it and they demanded for years but he is a MEP and campaigned and won again.  He promised immigration control which is a bit contradicting being of French ancestry and married to a German  wife. He plays the average Joe but was educating in a top Dulwich school costing £17,000 a year and had been a Tory MP for years.  It was amazing the win in Clacton which was a stronghold of the Tories.  Was it a hand-over to blind the public? Would it be surprising? No.  Is the UKIP a pre-arrangement for if the Tories will not get the majority; the UKIP would top it up? 

Looking at the great mismanagement of the Coalition brought back memories of the scandal surrounding the actual Election 2010.

Surely it never happened before in all its history that at 10 pm the Polling Station was closed on queues of 300 to 500 voters still outside on each station.  Over the years at that time any polling station was getting empty in the last half-an-hour. So what happened this time? Was there purposely a delay?

Voters were furious and senior politician demanded an inquiry. However, as the time went there was never another mentioning of an inquiry and if the public was not informed of the result.

A very obvious fact was that most of the polling stations being closed with hundreds of voters still being outside were mostly in the heartland of Labour. It was polling station like Newcastle, Birmingham, Leeds, Sheffield, Manchester, South Yorkshire, Sutton Coldfield and Leeds. Also in the East End of London and south were there is a strong Labour support.

Before the General Election in 2010 David Cameron and his Tory Party made a contract with the people and promised if they would not keep it the people could kick them out. Well none of it was kept.  Well, what are people waiting for?

Now to analyse it, if we can, is that the Conservative snatched number of seats in the Northern Heartland. Was it due to some organised delay so the queue of the voters would build-up and then waiving the rules and regulation about to be locked out?  It is a very unusual event which never happened before and it  bound to make suspicions grow.

After Margaret Thatcher and friends were in power the country was like dead. No roads were swept, parks not kept and schools and council houses fell into disrepair. The Conservatives managed to bring the country down to 5 million unemployed because Margaret Thatcher destroyed the coal mines, ship building, steel industry and the people had nowhere to go to find work. She won the second and third election on the back of first allowing them to buy their council houses and the second with privatising the rail, electricity and gas and blind folding the people with offering shares in these industries. Soon it started to backfire because with unemployment the people had to sell their homes and lost their deposit and sell back their share with a loss. Nowadays people are suffering with high inflated prices of these industries because the real benefiting shareholders want all the money they can get. Margaret Thatcher only allowed 10 per cent of every privatisation to be sold to the public. Guess where the rest went?

Coming back to the great mess of the last election, it was against the law because every voter over 18 of age has the right to vote. That is democracy and if no inquiry was held which is plausible otherwise the shamble would have come out and the Conservative Party might have to face a different result.

When Labour came into power they took over a country completely on its knees and they brought the country right up to the 21^st century. Only one criticism has to be made that Mr Blair listen too much to Mr Bush and got involve into two illegal wars. 

GORDON BROWN

Mr Brown might not have that flair and showmanship like Toni Blair but he was a great financier and had the country up to 1 per cent GDP during a great economic pressure. Within a month or two Cameron had that demolished and now most properly will have a treble dip recession.

Mr Brown in his last budget had a lot of small increases to help various hard-up people and he would have had the country by now well out of it. He also announced an increase to the budget of the NHS, police, military forces and he would have never have cut tens of thousand of people in these jobs.

It was a cautious but good budget why people turned on Labour or were made to, we will never know

PM CAMERON CUTS DISABLED BENEFITS WATCHING PARALYMPICS

Referring back to the plan of cutting disability benefits which is already quietly in action brings it even more into focus during the Paralympics. Disabled people, even if they don’t compete in the Paralympics, deserve nothing but admirations. How they are cope in the very ordinary life to get through the day being handicapped in one way or another. Therefore, they should get best benefits which is available and it must available because money is not cut but increased for Foreign aids, sending army into another civil war which has nothing to do with the UK, bail-outs every year on top of EU contributions and wrong expenses paid to MPs and ex-Prime Ministers.  The worst and it is the highest, is the £500,000 paid for expenses to Margaret Thatcher. She doesn’t attend any meeting because she got dementia.  How dare the government be so callous with the taxpayers’ money and at the same time cut benefits to disabled people and pensioners?

THAT IS WHERE AUSTERITY SHOULD START AT CUTTING FOREIGN AID, BAIL-OUTS, EX-PM PENSIONS AND EXPENSES.

Now I am coming to my main point. The Paralympic with the Opening Ceremony was even better than the Olympics. It was heartbreaking to see these athletes with their various disabilities and yet they looked so eager and smiling all the way. Already what they achieved in the Opening Ceremony was fantastic leave alone the following competitions in various sports aiming for gold, silver or bronze.

It went to every one heart how great these athletes are to overcome such tremendous difficulties.

Yet, how can David Cameron sit there plus other government official and watch these people knowing very well what they done to them? It is beyond any understanding. David Cameron and his friends live in greatest luxuries from a start. Never have any money problems or worries but making out they know what it is like furthermore trying to convince the public. How can David Cameron be so unscrupulous and even state: “The Olympics made us proud but this will make us even prouder?” It is certainly beyond any ordinary people’s understanding and unforgivable.